own-site
Skill0 starsChanged 7 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Read-only security look at a site the user controls. Ownership is verified first (DNS TXT or well-known file), then one request for headers. Nothing else.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
When they say it's placed, own_site_verify.
- Distinctive: line 19
If the user asks for anything beyond headers on this domain, or anything on a domain they haven't verified, refuse and cite AUP · You may …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Own-site method (v0 slice)
Scope in v0: ownership verification plus a headers read of the homepage. No crawling, no probing, no forms, no auth. That is on purpose: trust is the product.
own_site_challengewith the domain. Give the user the two options (DNS TXT at_reversium.<domain>, or/.well-known/reversium.txt).- When they say it's placed,
own_site_verify. If not verified, stop; say DNS may take minutes. own_site_headers. Report present / missing headers and the notes, thenblueprint_createwith domainown-site:- TARGET — the domain and how ownership was proven.
- FOUND — headers present and missing, server disclosure.
- PLAN — the exact header values to add (CSP, HSTS, nosniff, frame-ancestors, referrer, permissions) for their host.
- LOOP — re-run
own_site_headersafter the change. - RULES — owner-verified · one request · read-only.
If the user asks for anything beyond headers on this domain, or anything on a domain they haven't verified, refuse and cite AUP · You may not · 6.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

