lab-notebook
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Maintains a Markdown lab notebook for experiments, debugging, and operational investigations: keep current understanding in a concise summary and preserve meaningful work as append-only chronological entries. Use when the user says /lab-notebook, asks to start or update a lab notebook, or wants experimental work preserved for re-entry and auditability.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kreid415/claude-science-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 3, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- kreid415/claude-science-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- babysitSkill
- dashboard-uiSkill
- factorySkill
- oliverspec-applySkill
- oliverspec-babysitSkill
- oliverspec-exploreSkill
- oliverspec-proposeSkill
- oliverspec-scopeSkill
- oliverspec-shipSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Use the path supplied by the user.
- Very specific: line 26
If none exists, create lab-notebook.md in the repository's established documentation or operations directory.
- Distinctive: line 27
Read the entire file before appending or changing the summary.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not create multiple equally detailed notebooks for one investigation.
- Distinctive: line 63
Keep the summary short enough for a fresh agent to re-enter without reading the full chronology.
- Very specific: line 67
After each meaningful experiment, debugging step, probe, or job intervention, append one entry under ## Chronology.
- Distinctive: line 69
Chronological entries are append-only: Never edit, reorder, or delete an existing entry.
- Distinctive: line 107
Never record credentials, secret values, private tokens, or sensitive payloads.
- Distinctive: line 112
After appending an entry, update the summary only when one of these changed:
- Distinctive: line 120
Do not copy chronological detail into the summary.
- Distinctive: line 127
Every meaningful intervention has exactly one chronological entry.
- Distinctive: line 130
No secret-bearing content is present.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Lab Notebook
Maintain one Markdown file as both a concise re-entry guide and a literal activity log.
Announce: Lab Notebook: <path>.
Choose the file
- Use the path supplied by the user.
- Otherwise reuse the project's existing lab-notebook file or documented convention.
- If none exists, create
lab-notebook.mdin the repository's established documentation or operations directory. Use the repository root only when no better location exists. - Read the entire file before appending or changing the summary.
Do not create multiple equally detailed notebooks for one investigation.
File structure
Use this shape:
# <Investigation name>
## Current target
<The concrete question or capability under investigation.>
## Current understanding
- <Only settled or currently best-supported beliefs.>
## Success criterion
<Observable condition that ends the investigation successfully.>
## Hypothesis registry
| Hypothesis | Strongest support | Strongest weakening evidence | Next falsifier |
| ---------- | ----------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| <claim> | <evidence> | <counter-evidence> | <discriminative check> |
## Next best check
<The single check with the highest information value.>
## ChronologyKeep the summary short enough for a fresh agent to re-enter without reading the full chronology.
Record work
After each meaningful experiment, debugging step, probe, or job intervention, append one entry under ## Chronology.
Chronological entries are append-only. Never edit, reorder, or delete an existing entry. Record corrections, reversals, and addenda as new entries that reference the earlier timestamp and title.
### YYYY-MM-DD HH:mmZ — <short entry title>
**Question or goal**
<What this step was intended to learn or accomplish.>
**Action taken**
- <Exact commands, scripts, configuration, and environment boundaries.>
**Evidence**
- <Job, trace, commit, artifact, transcript, output, or file identifiers.>
**Result**
<What actually happened, including negative results.>
**Conclusion**
<Inference drawn from the result, if any.>
**Inference confidence:** low | medium | high
**Decision impact / so what?**
<What changed in current understanding or what should happen next.>Rules:
- Preserve UTC chronology and exact identifiers.
- Record negative results when they eliminate a plausible path.
- Include confidence only when drawing an inference.
- Link or name reproducible scripts, fixtures, and artifacts instead of pasting large raw outputs.
- Never record credentials, secret values, private tokens, or sensitive payloads.
- Skip routine commands that produced no new evidence.
Update the summary
After appending an entry, update the summary only when one of these changed:
- Current best explanation or baseline
- Settled negative result
- Success criterion or decision rule
- Live hypothesis support or falsifier
- Next best check
Do not copy chronological detail into the summary. The summary is mutable; the chronology is not.
Completion criteria
The notebook is current when:
- The summary reflects the latest supported understanding.
- Every meaningful intervention has exactly one chronological entry.
- Corrections and addenda preserve the original record.
- Reproducible evidence paths resolve.
- No secret-bearing content is present.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

