implement
Skill1 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement a piece of work based on a spec or set of tickets.
191 other projects use a version of this, 60 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dz114879/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivredited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ask-matt, claude-handoff and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 91 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 42 projects that use this
GoogleSkillresolving-merge-conflicts
Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.
Also in 83 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 47 projects that use this
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 60
- mattpocock/skills★ 309k18% same
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40k26% same
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40k26% same
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13k18% same
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3k18% same
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9k18% same
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1k26% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66726% same
- aws/graph-explorer★ 49026% same
- biersoeckli/QuickStack★ 36518% same
50 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 131
- foambubble/foam★ 17ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- meta-pytorch/OpenEnv★ 2.8ksame name
- huggingface/OpenEnv★ 2.8ksame name
- oxsecurity/megalinter★ 2.6ksame name
- pymc-labs/pymc-marketing★ 1.3ksame name
- adobe/S3Mock★ 1.2ksame name
- nodetool-ai/nodetool★ 615same name
- stevesolun/ctx★ 583same name
121 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository107 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- audit-agent-documentationSkill
- automate-meSkill
- babysit-and-shipSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- coordinatorSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- git-guardrailsSkill
- maintain-skillsSkill
- principlesSkill
- pstack-helpSkill
- pstack-modeSkill
- pstack-setupSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- retroSkill
- setup-matt-pocock-skillsSkill
- show-me-your-workSkill
- swarmSkill
- usage-reviewSkill
- wizardSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- broSkill
- in-your-own-wordsSkill
- ketchupSkill
- ketchup-videoSkill
- next-optionsSkill
- prSkill
- reply-shapeSkill
- teachSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- unslopSkill
- write-like-meSkill
- correctSkill
- create-formal-verification-skillSkill
- create-verification-skillSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- implement-specSkill
- linting-alignmentSkill
- maintain-formal-verification-skillSkill
- maintain-verification-skillSkill
- make-bot-uiSkill
- pstack-tddSkill
- setup-agent-sign-inSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- setup-ts-deep-modulesSkill
- statechartSkill
- tddSkill
- typescript-best-practicesSkill
- update-dependenciesSkill
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- design-prototypeSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- howSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Implement
- Read the requested spec or tickets and state their identity, accepted scope, and test seams. If a reference is ambiguous, ask. Resolve the project's shared artifacts through /domain-modeling; consume them without reopening settled decisions. Invoke /principles for implementation before code changes. Complete when the work, applicable design constraints, and its done predicate are grounded in the existing source of truth.
- Implement vertical slices through /tdd where a useful test path exists. Reuse agreed seams and repository checks; run typechecking and single test files regularly. Use /swarm only for useful bounded delegation, with isolated writers and one coordinator for canonical docs; explicitly pass /principles and the resolved applicable owners to writers. Recheck selection when the work reveals a new branch. Complete each slice when its observed behavior satisfies its acceptance criteria and applicable rules.
- Reconcile accepted domain changes through /domain-modeling and inspect the full diff. Recheck /principles for verification, run the full test suite once and other relevant checks, and invoke /review-loop for the final artifact, reusing valid review evidence supplied by the caller. Resolve actionable findings; when a fix changes the reviewed artifact, refresh the affected review coverage and checks. Complete when implementation, docs, acceptance evidence against the actual artifact, and review findings agree at the delivered revision or a gap is explicit.
- Commit the scoped result to the current branch when authorized and prepare a draft PR when requested or part of the existing grant. Invoke /pr for its description. Keep tracker closure tied to the project's actual completion boundary. Complete when the result is reviewable and delivery state is truthful.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

