kotlin-concurrency-and-flow
chrisbanes/skills/skills/kotlin-concurrency-and-flow/SKILL.md
Use when writing or reviewing Kotlin coroutine scope ownership, raw Thread or Executor work, init launches, non-suspending launch APIs, runBlocking, cancellation, StateFlow, SharedFlow, Channel, stateIn, SharingStarted, state updates, or one-shot events.
Skill1.1k starsChanged 4 months ago
---
name: kotlin-concurrency-and-flow
description: Use when writing or reviewing Kotlin coroutine scope ownership, raw Thread or Executor work, init launches, non-suspending launch APIs, runBlocking, cancellation, StateFlow, SharedFlow, Channel, stateIn, SharingStarted, state updates, or one-shot events.
---
# Kotlin concurrency and Flow
## Core principle
Give asynchronous work an explicit owner and lifetime, then model durable state
and transient events with primitives whose delivery and replay semantics match
the product contract.
## Procedure
1. Identify each coroutine owner, cancellation boundary, producer, consumer,
durable state, and transient event.
2. Before changing an API, compare its existing caller-visible contract with
the required owner and lifetime. If a suspend API already gives its caller
cancellation, result, and failure ownership, finish with no change; do not
add a scope, `launch`, callback, or deferred wrapper merely for convenience.
3. Select a scope whose lifecycle owns the work; do not retain arbitrary scopes
or hide unstructured launches behind non-suspending APIs.
4. Model renderable, current data as state and imperative one-shot work as an
event only when its loss and replay behavior are explicitly acceptable.
Ask whether one consumer handles each event or every active consumer must
receive it. A `Channel` hands each event to one consumer; a configured
`SharedFlow` broadcasts to active consumers. If that consumer contract is
unknown, state both options and the decision needed before choosing one.
For a one-consumer navigation handoff that must survive a collector gap,
choose a buffered `Channel` exposed as `receiveAsFlow()`; do not preserve a
replay-zero `SharedFlow` after identifying event loss as the defect.
5. Choose Flow sharing and buffering semantics from the producer and consumer
lifetimes rather than from a default.
6. Read the focused reference for the material concern below.
7. Finish when cancellation, restart, replay, and failure behavior are all
observable from the public API and no caller must guess who owns the work.
## Topic router
| Signal | Read |
|---|---|
| Stored `CoroutineScope`, raw `Thread` or `Executor` work, `init { launch }`, fire-and-forget API, `runBlocking`, broad catch, or cancellation boundary | [Structured concurrency](references/structured-concurrency.md) |
| `StateFlow`, `SharedFlow`, `Channel`, `stateIn`, `SharingStarted`, `.value`, state updates, sentinel values, or one-shot events | [Flow state and events](references/flow-state-events.md) |
| Compose collection or UI effect handling | [Compose state and effects](../compose-state-and-effects/SKILL.md) |
Discussion
Did this work in your project? Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.
Posts are public.Sign in to post
No one has posted yet. Be the first.

