agentleFS
chipweaverchipweaver/veripower/skills/lint-cdc/SKILL.md

lint-cdc

Skill10 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub

Check RTL lint and clock-domain crossings with SpyGlass, evaluate violations and justified waivers, and close the current assessment.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Write under {workdir}; upstream inputs remain read-only.

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Run make lint, make cdc, or make all from the prepared workdir.

    line 29
  3. Very specific:

    Use --fail-reason for unjustified waivers or invalid/incomplete checks, even when counts are zero.

    line 46

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Lint and CDC

Assess the RTL against the task's lint and CDC requirements. Read dispatch.json, original intent, requirements, RTL, constraint annotations and specification SGDC. Use carried evidence when its implementation, setup and scope still apply; choose the checks the current task needs.

Write under {workdir}; upstream inputs remain read-only. The framework carries published setup and reports into this directory, without the old verdict. Keep useful analysis in evidence/.

Prepare and check

<skill> is this skill's directory:

python3 <skill>/scripts/lintcdc/__main__.py bootstrap --workdir {workdir}

Bootstrap installs missing setup without overwriting authored files and refreshes the file list and generated SGDC. constraint-annotations.json supplies synchronizer, reset, case-analysis and quasi-static declarations. Check inherited scripts/local.sgdc and scripts/waiver.tcl against the current design. Correct invalid input declarations at their source.

Run make lint, make cdc, or make all from the prepared workdir; all shares elaboration. The entrypoint withdraws the selected check's old summaries before execution. Wait for completion, read the reports and inspect both reported and waived violations. The reports include native waiver details when messages were waived. Record the basis in -comment, with evidence references where needed; assess it against the requirements, including whether limits apply before or after waivers. Repair local setup errors and rerun the affected checks.

Judge and close

python3 <skill>/scripts/lintcdc/__main__.py finalize --workdir {workdir} \
  [--requirements '[{"id":"R-1","met":true,"actual":"observed result","measured":"report and scope"}]'] \
  [--fail-reason "unresolved cause"] [--fix-owner <rule>]

Declare a judgment for every lint-cdc requirement using the reports and the actual waiver policy. finalize reads lint-violations.json and cdc-violations.json; it does not judge waiver reasoning. Use --fail-reason for unjustified waivers or invalid/incomplete checks, even when counts are zero. Name the repair owner from the defect, including this stage for its own setup; do not infer ownership from the path of an error. Attribution guidance describes the constraint sources to check. Acceptance changes follow the user's actual authorization.

Finalize withdraws the previous result before judging. Exit 0 means a pass/fail result was written; return STATUS: DONE. On a nonzero exit, resolve the cause or return STATUS: BLOCKED <cause>.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.