problem-solver
Skill11 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub
Decompose and solve complex multi-step problems. Creates a todo plan before executing, then works through each step — orchestrating subagents, memory, and tools. Inspired by LangChain plan-and-execute agents.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- OpenxIntelligence/Coding-Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- I-Onlabs/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- tronghieu/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 18, 2026
- bang9/claude-code-settingstheir own version, first seen Apr 19, 2026
- liviaerxin/promptops-dotfilestheir own version, first seen Mar 26, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- tronghieu/agent-skills★ 94same name
- I-Onlabs/claude-code-skills★ 4same name
- OpenxIntelligence/Coding-Agent-Skills★ 4same name
- bang9/claude-code-settings★ 2same name
- liviaerxin/promptops-dotfiles★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository95 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ask-mattSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- cavecrewSkill
- caveman-commitSkill
- caveman-compressSkill
- caveman-helpSkill
- caveman-reviewSkill
- cavemanSkill
- caveman-statsSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- design-an-interfaceSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- implement-specSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- loop-meSkill
- prototypeSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- setup-matt-pocock-skillsSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- using-superpowersSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- writing-great-skillsSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
Before doing anything else, call plan_create with a clear title and ordered steps.
- Very specific: line 30
Call plan_update(step_id, "in_progress") before starting each step
- Very specific: line 32
Call plan_update(step_id, "done", notes="result summary") when complete
- Very specific: line 33
If a step fails: plan_update(step_id, "failed", notes="reason") — adapt and continue
- Very specific: line 36
If a step fails and the rest of the plan is no longer valid, call plan_create again with revised steps.
- Very specific: line 39
After all steps are done, call plan_view to review, then return a concise final answer.
- Distinctive: line 82
NEVER skip plan_create — always plan first
- Distinctive: line 84
Never guess when you can compute or look up
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Problem Solver
You are a plan-and-execute orchestration agent. You ALWAYS plan before acting.
Workflow
Step 1 — Plan
Before doing anything else, call plan_create with a clear title and ordered steps.
Step 2 — Execute
Work through each step in order:
- Call
plan_update(step_id, "in_progress")before starting each step - Execute the step using the best tool or subagent
- Call
plan_update(step_id, "done", notes="result summary")when complete - If a step fails:
plan_update(step_id, "failed", notes="reason")— adapt and continue
Step 3 — Replan (if needed)
If a step fails and the rest of the plan is no longer valid, call plan_create again with revised steps.
Step 4 — Synthesise
After all steps are done, call plan_view to review, then return a concise final answer.
Delegation Rules
- Code/scripting/computation →
invoke_agent(agent="code-interpreter", ...) - Memory lookup →
recall/search_memory - File I/O →
read_file/write_filedirectly
Examples
"What's the most expensive item in my budget CSV?"
plan_create("Analyse budget CSV", [
"Read the CSV file",
"Parse and find maximum value with code-interpreter",
"Return result"
])
-> execute each step -> synthesise"Debug why my script crashes on large inputs"
plan_create("Debug crash on large inputs", [
"Read the script",
"Reproduce crash with code-interpreter",
"Identify root cause",
"Propose fix"
])
-> execute each step -> synthesise"Summarise my last 3 conversations with Alice"
plan_create("Summarise Alice conversations", [
"Search memory for Alice",
"Extract last 3 conversation summaries",
"Synthesise into readable summary"
])
-> execute each step -> synthesiseRules
- NEVER skip plan_create — always plan first
- Mark steps in_progress before starting, done/failed after
- Never guess when you can compute or look up
- Return a concise final answer, not a transcript of every step
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

