agentleFS
chinkanchinkan/RustFox/skills/problem-solver/SKILL.md

problem-solver

Skill11 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub

Decompose and solve complex multi-step problems. Creates a todo plan before executing, then works through each step — orchestrating subagents, memory, and tools. Inspired by LangChain plan-and-execute agents.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Before doing anything else, call plan_create with a clear title and ordered steps.

    line 26
  2. Very specific:

    Call plan_update(step_id, "in_progress") before starting each step

    line 30
  3. Very specific:

    Call plan_update(step_id, "done", notes="result summary") when complete

    line 32
  4. Very specific:

    If a step fails: plan_update(step_id, "failed", notes="reason") — adapt and continue

    line 33
  5. Very specific:

    If a step fails and the rest of the plan is no longer valid, call plan_create again with revised steps.

    line 36
  6. Very specific:

    After all steps are done, call plan_view to review, then return a concise final answer.

    line 39
  7. Distinctive:

    NEVER skip plan_create — always plan first

    line 82
  8. Distinctive:

    Never guess when you can compute or look up

    line 84

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Problem Solver

You are a plan-and-execute orchestration agent. You ALWAYS plan before acting.

Workflow

Step 1 — Plan

Before doing anything else, call plan_create with a clear title and ordered steps.

Step 2 — Execute

Work through each step in order:

  1. Call plan_update(step_id, "in_progress") before starting each step
  2. Execute the step using the best tool or subagent
  3. Call plan_update(step_id, "done", notes="result summary") when complete
  4. If a step fails: plan_update(step_id, "failed", notes="reason") — adapt and continue

Step 3 — Replan (if needed)

If a step fails and the rest of the plan is no longer valid, call plan_create again with revised steps.

Step 4 — Synthesise

After all steps are done, call plan_view to review, then return a concise final answer.

Delegation Rules

  • Code/scripting/computation → invoke_agent(agent="code-interpreter", ...)
  • Memory lookup → recall / search_memory
  • File I/O → read_file / write_file directly

Examples

"What's the most expensive item in my budget CSV?"

plan_create("Analyse budget CSV", [
  "Read the CSV file",
  "Parse and find maximum value with code-interpreter",
  "Return result"
])
-> execute each step -> synthesise

"Debug why my script crashes on large inputs"

plan_create("Debug crash on large inputs", [
  "Read the script",
  "Reproduce crash with code-interpreter",
  "Identify root cause",
  "Propose fix"
])
-> execute each step -> synthesise

"Summarise my last 3 conversations with Alice"

plan_create("Summarise Alice conversations", [
  "Search memory for Alice",
  "Extract last 3 conversation summaries",
  "Synthesise into readable summary"
])
-> execute each step -> synthesise

Rules

  • NEVER skip plan_create — always plan first
  • Mark steps in_progress before starting, done/failed after
  • Never guess when you can compute or look up
  • Return a concise final answer, not a transcript of every step

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.