skill-finder
Skill1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
This skill should be used when the user wants to find, discover, or search for existing skills (技能) on GitHub or other skill marketplaces that match a stated functional requirement. Triggers include phrases like "帮我找一个能XX的skill", "搜一下有没有现成的skill", "find a skill for X", "is there an existing skill that can...", or any request to discover reusable agent skills before building one from scratch.
- Reads credentials
26 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- milad-ahmd/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- aktsmm/Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- omnigami-ai/skill-findertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- c95tj48sd8-a11y/skill-findertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zedarvates/frugal-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- geekfujiwara/copilot-cowork-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions26 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- chinaretaildesign/skill-finder★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 25
- Affitor/affiliate-skills★ 757same name
- mizchi/skills★ 369same name
- aktsmm/Agent-Skills★ 26same name
- peter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder★ 21same name
- ckorhonen/claude-skills★ 17same name
- geekfujiwara/copilot-cowork-skills★ 13same name
- kargnas/skills★ 9same name
- milad-ahmd/agent-skills★ 5same name
- robinbril/claude-code-harness★ 3same name
- sanyamk23/aphanis★ 3same name
15 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Follow these steps in order.
- Distinctive: line 24
If the requirement is vague (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 28
Run the bundled search script with one keyword set per invocation:
- Distinctive: line 36
Run 2-4 queries with different keyword sets, then merge and deduplicate results.
- Very specific: line 37
Use --fetch-readme owner/repo to pull a candidate's README (or SKILL.md) for closer inspection.
- Very specific: line 45
If the script fails (network block, rate limit), fall back to the WebSearch tool with queries like <keywords> skill site:github.com …
- Very specific: line 56
Compatibility: prefer skills using the standard SKILL.md format (YAML frontmatter with name and description) — these work in WorkBuddy …
- Distinctive: line 72
When copying files from another repo rather than cloning it directly into the skills directory, re-run the packaging validator from the …
- Distinctive: line 75
If nothing good exists, say so honestly and offer to build a custom skill with the skill-creator skill instead.
- Very specific: line 79
Never present a candidate as a match without reading its actual SKILL.md or README.
- Distinctive: line 81
Do not auto-install anything.
- Distinctive: line 82
Keep searches fast: 2-4 GitHub queries plus at most 2-3 marketplace lookups is usually enough for a first pass.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill Finder
Overview
This skill finds existing, ready-to-use agent skills on GitHub and other marketplaces that match a user's stated functional need, so the user can reuse rather than rebuild. Typical output: a ranked shortlist of candidate skills with links, star counts, maintenance status, fit assessment, and installation instructions.
Workflow
Follow these steps in order.
Step 1: Parse the Requirement
- Extract from the user's request:
- Core functionality (what the skill must do)
- Domain keywords in both English and Chinese (e.g. "PDF 表格提取" →
pdf,table extraction,extract tables) - Optional constraints: language preference, platform (WorkBuddy / Claude Code / generic agent), recency
- Compose 3-6 concise search keyword sets. Prefer English keywords for GitHub search; GitHub match quality is higher for English terms.
- If the requirement is vague (e.g. "找个好用的 skill"), ask the user for one concrete use case before searching.
Step 2: Search GitHub
Run the bundled search script with one keyword set per invocation:
python scripts/search_github.py --query "<keywords>" [--topic <topic>] [--min-stars <n>] [--limit <n>] [--fetch-readme <owner/repo>]- The script queries the GitHub Search API (repositories endpoint), no authentication required; set the
GITHUB_TOKENenvironment variable to raise rate limits. - Useful topic values:
claude-skills,agent-skills,skills,claude-code,mcp. - Run 2-4 queries with different keyword sets, then merge and deduplicate results.
- Use
--fetch-readme owner/repoto pull a candidate's README (or SKILL.md) for closer inspection. --min-starsfilters out junk; try 5 or 100 depending on how crowded the domain is.
Verified query behaviour (do not rediscover these the hard way):
- Keep queries to 1-3 words. GitHub requires every unqualified term to match, so a natural-language query like
pdf table extraction to excel skillreturns zero results, whilepdf skillreturns strong matches. The script now auto-retries with simplified, skill-biased variants, but starting short is faster and more precise. - Results are only as good as filtering done in Step 4: searches regularly surface ordinary libraries that merely share the domain words (e.g.
jsvine/pdfplumberis a Python library, not a skill).
If the script fails (network block, rate limit), fall back to the WebSearch tool with queries like <keywords> skill site:github.com SKILL.md.
Step 3: Search Other Marketplaces
Consult references/sources.md for the current list of known skill marketplaces and awesome-lists. For web marketplaces that have no API, use WebFetch on the listed URLs or WebSearch with the marketplace name plus the requirement keywords.
Step 4: Evaluate Candidates
For each promising candidate, assess:
- Relevance: does it actually implement the required functionality? Verify by fetching and reading its SKILL.md/README via WebFetch, not just the repo title.
- Compatibility: prefer skills using the standard
SKILL.mdformat (YAML frontmatter withnameanddescription) — these work in WorkBuddy directly. Claude Code skills in this format are also compatible. - Quality signals: star count, last commit date (prefer activity within 12 months), presence of scripts/references, clear usage instructions.
- Trust: skim the skill content for anything suspicious (obfuscated scripts, credential exfiltration, prompts instructing external data sends). Flag concerns to the user.
Step 5: Report and Offer Installation
Present the top 3-5 candidates in a table:
| Skill | Source link | Stars / Updated | What it does | Fit |
Then ask the user which one(s) to install. Many candidate repos publish install commands already (for example /plugin marketplace add owner/repo for Claude Code plugin marketplaces); read the README rather than guessing.
To install manually into WorkBuddy:
- Copy the skill folder (the one containing SKILL.md) to
~/.workbuddy/skills/<skill-name>/for user-level scope, or<workspace>/.workbuddy/skills/<skill-name>/for project scope. Usegit cloneof the source repo, then keep only the skill subdirectory when the skill lives inside a monorepo. - When copying files from another repo rather than cloning it directly into the skills directory, re-run the packaging validator from the skill-creator skill to confirm the copied structure is sound.
- Tell the user the skill is installed and may need a session restart to be picked up.
If nothing good exists, say so honestly and offer to build a custom skill with the skill-creator skill instead.
Guidelines
- Never present a candidate as a match without reading its actual SKILL.md or README.
- Report honestly when search results are poor; do not pad the list with weak matches.
- Do not auto-install anything; installation always requires the user's explicit choice.
- Keep searches fast: 2-4 GitHub queries plus at most 2-3 marketplace lookups is usually enough for a first pass.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

