agentleFS
chenson42chenson42/stackkeel/.claude/skills/release-notes/SKILL.md

release-notes

Skill1 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub

Write or update release notes for the current change, bump the version in the root package.json (and kit.json kitVersion), and create a new minor-version file when needed

176 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brainstorm-experiments-existing, brainstorm-ideas-new and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-experiments-existing

    Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-ideas-new

    Brainstorm feature ideas for a new product in initial discovery from PM, Designer, and Engineer perspectives. Use when starting product discovery for a new product, exploring features for a startup idea, or doing initial ideation.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • 45ckSkill

    pestle-analysis

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    positioning-ideas

    Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    product-name

    Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +7 more from skytiger6724

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 162 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No "Files Added" / "Files Modified" sections: Commit history covers that.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    If you find a prior entry with file-path bullets, fix it on the way through.

    line 21
  3. Very specific:

    Determine the version: Read the root package.json.

    line 29
  4. Very specific:

    New minor-version file if needed: If bumping MINOR, create the new file from the template below and add a nav link at the bottom of the …

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Only when there is a user-visible effect (new deploy target, new auth requirement, security improvement worth telling users about).

    line 96

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 162 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Release Notes

When the user invokes /release-notes, write a release-notes entry for the current change, bump the version, and keep the file structure consistent. The workspace versions as one unit: the root package.json version is the release version, mirrored into kit.json → kit.kitVersion (forks' upstream-sync reads it). Shared packages stay 0.0.0 — they are consumed via workspace:*, never published.

Style: Functional Changes Only

Release notes are written for the user — the person clicking through the app, or the engineer reading the changelog six months from now. They are not code review:

  • Describe behavior, not files. "Admins can now retry a failed email from the queue" beats "Modified email-queue/page.tsx." Never list file paths.
  • No "Files Added" / "Files Modified" sections. Commit history covers that.
  • Lead with Value. Why does this matter to a user? One sentence. If you can't write it, the change belongs in a commit message, not release notes.
  • User-visible only. Internal refactors that change no behavior get no entry. Library upgrades go in only when they affect users (security fix, perf, new capability).
  • A shared-package change is described in terms of what changed for users of the app(s) it altered. Invisible to every user → no entry.
  • Acceptable headings inside an entry: Value, What's New / Changes, Permissions (new feature keys — user-discoverable), New Routes (admin-discoverable only), Known follow-ups.

If you find a prior entry with file-path bullets, fix it on the way through.

Versioning

Semantic versioning, MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH: MAJOR — significant new functionality, breaking changes, major milestones; MINOR — new features, enhancements; PATCH — bug fixes, minor adjustments. Release-notes filenames use the major.minor form (docs/release-notes/v0.2.md).

Steps

  1. Determine the version. Read the root package.json; read the newest entry in the current docs/release-notes/vX.Y.md (sort numerically — v0.10 > v0.9). Bug fix → PATCH; feature → MINOR; breaking → MAJOR. Ask if unclear.
  2. New minor-version file if needed. If bumping MINOR, create the new file from the template below and add a nav link at the bottom of the previous file: → [v0.3](v0.3.md). If the admin docs viewer maintains an explicit allowlist, update it.
  3. Write the entry in the current minor-version file, newest first: add a Table of Contents row (| [X.Y.Z](#X.Y.Z) | YYYY-MM-DD | [Type] | [One-line description] |), then the full entry using the matching template (Feature / Enhancement / Defect Fix / Security / Infrastructure).
  4. Update guidance docs for drift introduced by the release: AGENTS.md (capability map, project layout, commands), docs/product/functionality-map.md for every feature added/changed/removed. If none apply, note "no user-visible surface changes."
  5. Bump the version — only when the branch is being prepared to merge into main: root package.json version AND kit.json → kit.kitVersion, kept identical. Documentation-only changes get no bump. All code changes on a branch ship as a single version.

Templates

Feature

<a name="X.Y.Z"></a>
## X.Y.Z — YYYY-MM-DD

### Feature: [Feature Name]

**Value:** [Why this was built]

#### What's New

- [User-facing change]

#### Permissions

| Feature key | Required for |
|-------------|--------------|
| `area.action` | Description |

#### New Routes (admin-discoverable only)

- `GET /path` — Description

Enhancement

<a name="X.Y.Z"></a>
## X.Y.Z — YYYY-MM-DD

### Enhancement: [Brief Description]

**Value:** [Why this improvement matters]

**Changes:**
- [Functional change]

Defect Fix

<a name="X.Y.Z"></a>
## X.Y.Z — YYYY-MM-DD

### Defect Fix: [Brief Description]

**Problem:** [What the user experienced]

**Root Cause:** [Why it happened]

**Fix:** [What now happens instead]

**Testing:**
- [x] Test case 1

Infrastructure / Security

Only when there is a user-visible effect (new deploy target, new auth requirement, security improvement worth telling users about). Same shape as Enhancement with a Value / Background line.

New Minor Version File

# Release Notes — vX.Y

*← [vX.(Y-1)](vX.(Y-1).md)*

---

## Table of Contents

| Version | Date | Type | Description |
|---------|------|------|-------------|
| [X.Y.0](#X.Y.0) | YYYY-MM-DD | Feature | Description |

---

[entries go here, newest first]

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.