markers
Skill1 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to flag a passage for later attention (plot holes, TODOs, or notes) inline on the manuscript. Triggers on "mark a plot hole in chapter X", "leave a TODO at this passage", "what plot holes are still open in this book", "resolve that note", "show me every open marker in Curses and Currents".
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- ads-studioSkill
- blog-post-and-newsletterSkill
- calendarSkill
- chapter-draftingSkill
- character-mergeSkill
- financeSkill
- getting-startedSkill
- manuscript-importSkill
- manuscript-revisionsSkill
- marketing-studioSkill
- mentionsSkill
- pen-namesSkill
- quick-task-captureSkill
- sales-studioSkill
- social-handoffSkill
- story-bibleSkill
- stos-setupSkill
- tasksSkill
- timelineSkill
- time-trackingSkill
- wordpress-connectSkill
- wordpress-llm-optimizationSkill
- wordpress-mediaSkill
- wordpress-pagesSkill
- wordpress-postsSkill
- wordpress-productsSkill
- wordpress-seoSkill
- worldbuilding-mergeSkill
- worldbuildingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 61
Use this when the marker was created in error or the writer wants it gone entirely.
- Very specific: line 79
A chapter-level note dressed up as a marker: If the writer's note is about the whole chapter, create a plain note with chapter_id and no …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Markers
What this is
A marker is an annotation the writer leaves on a passage in a scene. Markers are stored as notes: a note becomes a marker when it carries a marker_type and a scene_id. There is no separate markers tool; use the stos_notes_* tools.
marker_type | When to use it |
plot-hole | "Readers will ask why X." Continuity or logic risks flagged for revision. |
todo | "Come back, research the medieval falconry detail." |
note | "This foreshadows chapter 14." Editorial or craft observations. |
A marker can point at a character range inside the scene's prose (text_position_start / text_position_end, offsets into the text from stos_scenes_get_content), or at the whole scene when those are left out. Resolving a marker stamps resolved_at instead of deleting it, so the record of what was flagged and fixed stays intact.
Flow: create a marker
stos_notes_create({
fields: {
note_title: 'Quinn knows about the will too early', // required
content: 'How does Quinn know about the will before chapter 4?',
chapter_id: '...',
scene_id: '...',
marker_type: 'plot-hole',
text_position_start: 1280, // optional
text_position_end: 1380, // optional
},
})Pass the offsets when the writer has a specific passage in mind; leave them out for scene-level commentary.
Flow: list markers
stos_notes_list filters by chapterId only. It does not filter by scene, marker type, or open/resolved, so do that yourself on the returned notes:
stos_notes_list({ chapterId }) // then keep notes where scene_id matches, marker_type is set, and resolved_at is nullFor a whole book ("what's still flagged across my manuscript"), list the chapters with stos_chapters_list({ bookId: titleId }) and call stos_notes_list({ chapterId }) for each. Keep notes with a marker_type and no resolved_at. Group by chapter and scene when you report.
Flow: resolve or reopen
stos_notes_update({ id, fields: { resolved_at: new Date().toISOString() } }) // resolve
stos_notes_update({ id, fields: { resolved_at: null } }) // reopenFlow: delete (only when you really mean it)
stos_notes_delete({ id })Use this when the marker was created in error or the writer wants it gone entirely. The normal "I'm done with this concern" path is resolve, not delete.
When to use this vs. mentions
| Situation | Skill |
| "Quinn appears in this scene" | mentions |
| "Readers will ask why Quinn knows this here" | markers |
| "Tag the Codex entity in the prose" | mentions |
| "Leave a writer-note on this passage" | markers |
| Tracking process / open questions | markers |
| Tracking data / who appears where | mentions |
Anti-patterns
- Looking for
stos_markers_*tools. They were folded into notes; usestos_notes_*. - Deleting instead of resolving. Resolution keeps the history of what was flagged.
- Stuffing structural beats into markers. Story-structure details (beat, act, synopsis) belong on the scene or chapter record. Use
stos_scenes_updateorstos_chapters_updatefor those fields. - A chapter-level note dressed up as a marker. If the writer's note is about the whole chapter, create a plain note with
chapter_idand noscene_idormarker_type.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

