define-slo
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Define SLOs and calculate error budgets for services. Use when the user asks to "define an SLO", "set a service level objective", "calculate error budget", "how much error budget do I have", "what's my availability", "create SLO recording rules", "generate SLO burn rate alerts", "track reliability", or needs SLO/SLI definitions.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- dashboardSkill
- discoverSkill
- investigateSkill
- tune-alertsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 40
Use baselines from .sre/baselines/<name>.yaml to inform latency targets.
- Very specific: line 86
Write SLO definition to .sre/services/<name>.yaml under the slos field:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SLO Definition & Error Budget Tracking
Define Service Level Objectives, calculate error budgets, and generate Prometheus recording rules and burn-rate alert rules.
Prerequisite: .sre/ context from the discover skill.
Phase 1: Choose SLI Type
Based on available metrics in .sre/services/<name>.yaml:
If HTTP/gRPC metrics available:
- Availability SLI: ratio of successful requests to total requests
1 - (rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[window]) / rate(http_requests_total[window]))
- Latency SLI: ratio of requests faster than threshold
histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[window]))
If container metrics only:
- Availability SLI: pod uptime ratio
avg_over_time(kube_deployment_status_replicas_available{deployment="X"}[window]) / kube_deployment_spec_replicas{deployment="X"}
Phase 2: Set Targets
Common SLO targets (suggest based on service criticality):
| Tier | Availability | Latency p99 | Error Budget (30d) |
| Critical (payment, auth) | 99.95% | based on baseline p99 × 1.5 | 21.6 min |
| Standard (API, frontend) | 99.9% | based on baseline p99 × 2 | 43.2 min |
| Best-effort (batch, internal) | 99.5% | N/A | 3.6 hours |
Use baselines from .sre/baselines/<name>.yaml to inform latency targets.
Phase 3: Calculate Error Budget
Error budget = 1 - SLO target
Budget minutes (30d) = 30 * 24 * 60 * (1 - SLO)Query current consumption:
# If availability SLI:
# Total errors in window / total requests in window
curl -s --get "${PROMETHEUS_URL}/api/v1/query" \
--data-urlencode 'query=sum(increase(http_requests_total{job="<job>",status=~"5.."}[30d])) / sum(increase(http_requests_total{job="<job>"}[30d]))'Phase 4: Generate Artifacts
Prometheus Recording Rules (YAML)
groups:
- name: slo:<service>
rules:
- record: slo:<service>:availability:ratio_rate5m
expr: 1 - (sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="<job>",status=~"5.."}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="<job>"}[5m])))
- record: slo:<service>:error_budget:remaining
expr: 1 - (slo:<service>:errors:ratio_30d / (1 - <SLO_TARGET>))Multi-window Burn Rate Alerts
groups:
- name: slo:<service>:alerts
rules:
- alert: SLOBurnRateCritical
expr: slo:<service>:availability:ratio_rate5m < <SLO> AND slo:<service>:availability:ratio_rate1h < <SLO>
for: 2m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "<service> is burning error budget at critical rate"Phase 5: Update Context
Write SLO definition to .sre/services/<name>.yaml under the slos field:
slos:
- type: availability
target: 0.999
window: 30d
sli_query: "<PromQL>"
defined_at: <ISO timestamp>Generate a Grafana panel for the error budget (use the dashboard skill patterns) and suggest adding it to the service's existing dashboard.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

