soft-delete-and-archiving
Skill10 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when implementing soft deletes (deleted_at), restoring records, archiving instead of hard delete, or filtering active vs deleted rows in queries and RLS. Not for GDPR hard-delete requests that must purge data.
In this repository56 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-passSkill
- analytics-eventsSkill
- api-error-handlingSkill
- audit-logging-backendSkill
- background-jobs-and-cronSkill
- dark-mode-and-themingSkill
- dashboard-charts-rechartsSkill
- edge-functions-and-webhooksSkill
- email-and-notificationsSkill
- error-states-and-empty-uiSkill
- feature-flags-and-togglesSkill
- file-upload-storageSkill
- i18n-multi-languageSkill
- lovable-prompting-playbookSkill
- lovable-ship-checklistSkill
- migration-playbookSkill
- multi-tenant-backendSkill
- onboarding-copySkill
- optimistic-updatesSkill
- payment-failed-and-recoverySkill
- payment-webhook-idempotencySkill
- payment-webhook-testingSkill
- performance-budgetSkill
- pg-cron-recipesSkill
- pg-cron-scheduled-jobsSkill
- pg-cron-with-pg-net-edgeSkill
- postgres-full-text-searchSkill
- postgres-triggers-and-functionsSkill
- pricing-and-billingSkill
- programmatic-seo-content-qualitySkill
- programmatic-seo-pagesSkill
- rate-limiting-edgeSkill
- realtime-and-subscriptionsSkill
- refactor-safe-diffSkill
- release-notesSkill
- seo-core-web-vitalsSkill
- seo-landing-pageSkill
- seo-meta-tags-spaSkill
- seo-sitemap-generationSkill
- seo-ssr-and-prerenderingSkill
- seo-structured-dataSkill
- server-input-validationSkill
- shadcn-patternsSkill
- stripe-one-time-payment-webhooksSkill
- stripe-payment-webhooksSkill
- supabase-auth-flowsSkill
- supabase-database-designSkill
- supabase-rls-and-authSkill
- support-replySkill
- tanstack-infinite-queriesSkill
- tanstack-mutations-and-invalidationSkill
- tanstack-prefetch-and-hydrationSkill
- tanstack-query-alternativeSkill
- tanstack-router-data-loadersSkill
- tanstack-start-server-routesSkill
- typed-api-hooks-formsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
Default every app query:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Soft delete and archiving
Column pattern
alter table public.projects add column deleted_at timestamptz;
create index projects_active_idx on public.projects (organization_id)
where deleted_at is null;- Active:
deleted_at is null - Deleted:
deleted_at is not null(set tonow()on delete)
Optional: deleted_by uuid references auth.users(id).
Queries
Default every app query:
.from("projects").select("*").is("deleted_at", null)Views can encapsulate:
create view public.projects_active as
select * from public.projects where deleted_at is null;RLS
Policies should exclude soft-deleted rows for normal users:
using (deleted_at is null and /* membership check */)Admins may select deleted via separate policy or service role.
Restore
update projects set deleted_at = null, deleted_by = null where id = $1 — only owner/admin.
Hard delete
Reserve for legal/GDPR: edge function + service role after retention period; document in audit log.
Avoid
- Unique constraints broken by soft delete — use partial unique index:
create unique index projects_org_slug_active_idx
on public.projects (organization_id, slug) where deleted_at is null;- Cascading hard delete when product expects archive.
Checklist
- All list queries filter
deleted_at is null - Partial unique indexes where needed
- Restore path tested
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

