agentleFS
cezarafcezaraf/avc-template/.agents/skills/avc-start/SKILL.md

avc-start

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Start or reframe one AVC/XP story by capturing a small observable outcome, examples, non-goals, risk lane, scope budget, commands, and next factual signal. Use before implementation when no valid active run exists.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Create or amend .avc/run.yaml only as Navigator.

    line 27

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Start an AVC/XP story

Act as the Navigator and read AGENTS.md, .avc/config.yaml, and the current .avc/run.yaml if present. Query ai-memory for related prior decisions when the subsystem or task is non-trivial; validate recalled claims against current instructions and checkout state.

Capture one vertical outcome, why it matters, explicit non-goals, one to three observable examples, reversibility, the smallest initial allow/deny surface, and known commands. Classify risk from .avc/config.yaml: risk_triggers: confirmed_impacts and a lane's confirmed_paths promote a lane on their own; signal_keywords and a lane's signal_paths are scouting signals only (never proof) — a path that only names a convention (e.g. **/auth/**) must not by itself force a lane the way a real confirmed impact does. Run python3 .avc/bin/avc.py classify as a mechanical cross-check on the path/keyword side of this before declaring the lane — it never replaces your judgment on semantic confirmed_impacts, but a floor it reports above what you're about to declare is worth a second look. Unknown risk is at least guarded. Promotion is autonomous for the Navigator; reduction is human-only.

Create or amend .avc/run.yaml only as Navigator. Keep the oracle draft, the graph to one Scout node, and implementation inactive until baseline, frame, and oracle gates pass. Do not invent commands, HEAD, acceptance, or human authority.

Return the canonical result from .avc/templates/agent-result.yaml and stop with BLOCKED when outcome/acceptance authority cannot be inferred safely.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.