skill-author
Skill6 starsChanged 42 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design or improve a reusable Claude Agent Skill with precise activation criteria, focused instructions, examples, verification, and safe boundaries. Use when creating or refactoring a SKILL.md.
23 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DylXBT/claude-orchestrator-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- himkt/cafleettheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemontheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- educlopez/mallardtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- mandasTeam/skill-authortheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Lethe044/agentskill-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 23
- generative-computing/mellea★ 1.9ksame name
- aqm857886159/Nomi★ 550same name
- DylXBT/claude-orchestrator-skills★ 114same name
- robium-ai/robium★ 93same name
- himkt/cafleet★ 56same name
- Lethe044/agentskill-kit★ 48same name
- manusco/resonance★ 38same name
- Zhonghao1995/agentic-swmm-workflow★ 31same name
- felvieira/claude-skills-fv★ 27same name
- peter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder★ 21same name
13 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- bioinformatics-planningSkill
- biology-literature-analysisSkill
- biology-paper-analysisSkill
- chemistry-research-analysisSkill
- codebase-explorerSkill
- codebase-understandingSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- debug-systematicallySkill
- implementation-plannerSkill
- implementation-reviewSkill
- ledger-tasks-yyloSkill
- test-and-verifySkill
- algorithm-learningSkill
- system-design-basicsSkill
- defensive-security-reviewSkill
- threat-modelingSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- tutorSkill
- experiment-analysisSkill
- model-evaluationSkill
- numerical-methodsSkill
- mathematics-problem-solverSkill
- proof-solvingSkill
- physics-research-analysisSkill
- data-cleaningSkill
- data-visualizationSkill
- evidence-checkerSkill
- evidence-comparisonSkill
- experimental-planningSkill
- literature-synthesizerSkill
- reproducibility-auditSkill
- research-questionSkill
- source-verificationSkill
- api-designSkill
- frontend-planningSkill
- technical-editorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create skills that are reusable, testable, and easy for another contributor to understand.
- Distinctive: line 13
Write an activation description that states when it should be used.
- Distinctive: line 14
Keep instructions focused on behavior, not background exposition.
- Distinctive: line 17
Add examples when they clarify invocation or expected output.
- Distinctive: line 20
Test against representative tasks.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill Author
Create skills that are reusable, testable, and easy for another contributor to understand.
Process
- Define one clear job for the skill.
- Write an activation description that states when it should be used.
- Keep instructions focused on behavior, not background exposition.
- Separate required steps from optional guidance.
- Include failure conditions and safety boundaries.
- Add examples when they clarify invocation or expected output.
- Define verification that can expose common failures.
- Move large reference material outside the main skill.
- Test against representative tasks.
- Revise based on observed failures.
Quality checklist
- Is the purpose specific?
- Is the trigger description useful?
- Are assumptions explicit?
- Is the output format clear?
- Can the skill be tested?
- Does it avoid unnecessary permissions or destructive actions?
- Does it duplicate an existing Atlas resource?
Output
Return:
- Skill purpose
- Activation description
- Instructions
- Examples
- Verification plan
- Known limitations
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

