shipping-and-launch
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write the release runbook once a person has merged — pre-launch clearance with its evidence, the flag and staged-rollout plan, the thresholds deciding advance, hold or roll back, and the rollback path. Authors it, runs none of it. A slice at a draft pull request is `pull-request`; the pipeline that deploys is `ci-cd`.
65 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TheAstroByte/astrobyte-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MMACABRE/SKILLStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- steven123397/nexuskit-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AgnesAI-Labs/agnet-skills-cntheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- oleg494/coding-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use constraint-driven-development, brainstorm-experiments-existing and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 16 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-experiments-existing
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillprioritize-assumptions
Prioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for each. Use when triaging a list of assumptions, deciding what to test first, or applying the assumption prioritization canvas.
Also in 4 projects that use this
45ckSkillpestle-analysis
Also in 4 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillpositioning-ideas
Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +2 more from skytiger6724
Other versions65 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 65
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 114ksame name
- ollaya-dev/ollaya★ 1.4ksame name
- shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp★ 174same name
- vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh★ 46same name
- jmxt3/gitscape.ai★ 33same name
- sampleXbro/agentsmesh★ 27same name
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 22same name
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skills★ 21same name
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 6same name
- lza6/claw-code-tingfeng★ 5same name
55 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- acceptance-criteriaSkill
- aim-higherSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-designSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- ci-cdSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- codebase-researchSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- comprehension-quizSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- environment-manifestSkill
- gauntlet-loopSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- handoffSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- interview-meSkill
- literate-explainerSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- plan-breakdownSkill
- preflight-readinessSkill
- project-setupSkill
- pull-requestSkill
- quality-verificationSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- spec-grillingSkill
- spec-reviewSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- to-prdSkill
- using-agent-skillsSkill
- worktreeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 58 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 103
Write the runbook and run none of it: Every deploy, flag enable, canary advance and rollback in it is a step a person takes later, so its …
- Very specific: line 169
No skill reads release.md.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 58 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Shipping and Launch
Purpose
Stage: Ship. Principles 1, 5, 6, 7.
Writes the release runbook for work a person has already merged: the pre-launch clearance and its
evidence, the flag and rollout plan, the thresholds deciding advance, hold or roll back, the way back, and
what the first hour watches. It emits release.md and fires none of it — release-level, past the end of
the autonomous span.
When to use / when to skip
- A person has merged a feature's slices and it reaches production for the first time, or several merged changes are batched into one release, or a beta or early-access audience opens.
- A deploy that moves data or infrastructure, where the way back matters more than the way forward.
- Skip a docs- or config-only change with no user-visible runtime effect — nothing to stage, nothing to roll back.
- Near-miss — a slice still at an open draft pull request:
pull-request. The deploy pipeline, its gates and the rollback workflow:ci-cd. Instrumenting the code this runbook watches:observability-and-instrumentation. Moving a schema or retiring an interface:deprecation-and-migration.
Inputs
Take each from the prompt where it is given, the canonical path otherwise; with a person present, at most three questions, and only where the gap changes the release's shape — usually whether a flag service exists.
- the merged change — the commits on the base branch since the last release, and their diff — helps: what
ships, and what a rollback has to undo · without it: the last tag to
HEAD, name the range you read,derived. docs/features/<slug>/environment.md— helps: the typed rows naming the production and staging targets and the flag, monitoring and error-reporting services · without it: the repo's CI and deploy configuration,derived— read either for what exists, never for a value or a command.docs/features/<slug>/prd.mdand the ADRs it cites — helps: the success measure the thresholds bind to, and the Not-Doing list a rollout cannot cross · without it:intent.md, or what the feature changes for a user,derived.docs/features/<slug>/qa.md— helps: the verdict, the exercised ledger and thenot-reachableids, which say what the first hour watches by hand · without it: the tests the merged diff carries,derived.- the merged pull request bodies — helps: each slice's risk band and Decided-for-you rows, what a person
already flagged · without it: the diff and
docs/session-log.md,derived.
Process
- Name what this release covers before writing about it — the merged commits or slices, and their
diff. A change still at an open draft pull request is not in it; it goes back to
pull-request. Clear each pre-launch area against its standing list, and write beside it what cleared it.
Area Cleared against correctness · quality · integration · documentation definition-of-done.mdsecurity security-checklist.mdperformance performance-checklist.mdaccessibility accessibility-checklist.mdmonitoring observability-checklist.md· Pre-launch gateinfrastructure production configuration set · migrations ready with their reverse · DNS, SSL and CDN answering · a health check that returns An area that will not clear is written down as outstanding with what it needs; a
concernsverdict or an open Required finding tops the first hour's watch list instead of holding the release, while a Critical or High security finding is a stop-list item (safety-rails.md).- Plan the rollout as stages, each with an audience, a monitoring window, a named watcher and a way back — staging with the full suite and a smoke pass, production with the flag off and a health check, the team, then 5% → 25% → 50% → 100%, stepping back a stage rather than forward whenever a window reads unclear.
- Give the flag an owner and a removal date in the line that names it. Its life runs off in production → on for the team → canary → full → flag and dead path deleted, within two weeks of full rollout; nesting flags multiplies the states to test, and both states of each belong in CI. Where no flag service exists, say so and make every stage's way back a revert of the deploy — a stage with no way back is not a stage.
Bind advance, hold and roll back to the measure
prd.mdcalls success, so the numbers are this feature's rather than a template's, and record the baseline each is read against.Signal Advance Hold and investigate Roll back error rate within 10% of baseline 10–100% above over 2× baseline p95 latency within 20% of baseline 20–50% above over 50% above client-side errors no new type new, under 0.1% of sessions new, over 0.1% of sessions the feature's success measure flat or better down under 5% down over 5% A data-integrity problem, a security finding or a spike in user reports rolls back on contact, without waiting for the window to close.
- Write the way back before the deploy that will need it — triggers, steps, what becomes of data the
new code wrote, a time-to-rollback per route (flag, redeploy, migration). An irreversible step with no
rollback is a stop-list item (
safety-rails.md) — name it in the runbook as that, and invent no reverse for it. - Name what is watched, and what the first hour checks — the application and infrastructure metric
groups, depth in
observability-checklist.md, and the client-side group: Core Web Vitals, depth inperformance-checklist.md, client JS errors, client-side API error rate; then the health check, the error dashboard, latency, the critical flow driven by hand, logs arriving, the rollback route rehearsed. - Write the runbook and run none of it. Every deploy, flag enable, canary advance and rollback in it
is a step a person takes later, so its
Deploy fencereadsExecuted by: human, post-mergeand this pass fires none of them, nogh pr merge, no push tomain(safety-rails.md— a human merges). - Take a default wherever the inputs are silent — a baseline, a window length, an environment name —
state the reason, mark the value
derived, append onedocs/session-log.mdentry, so whoever deploys sees the choice rather than inheriting it.
Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "It works in staging, so it works in production" | Production carries different data, traffic and edge cases; the first hour is where that shows. |
| "This change is too small to need a flag" | Without one the way back is a revert of the whole deploy — the stage's rollback, written down or not. |
| "Monitoring can go in after launch" | A signal with no pre-deploy baseline cannot tell a regression from a Tuesday. |
| "The migration is one-way, so plan around it" | An irreversible step with no rollback is a stop-list item (safety-rails.md) — a rollback written for a step that has none is fiction. |
| "Rolling back would admit the release failed" | A rehearsed way back is what makes shipping early affordable. |
| "Every gate came back green" | The gates graded the change; the deploy is a separate act, and nothing has graded that. |
Red flags
- A ticked pre-launch box with nothing beside it saying what cleared it.
- A rollout stage with no audience, window or named watcher.
- A flag with no owner or removal date, or one nested inside another.
- Thresholds copied from a template, with no baseline named beside them.
- A runbook written around a step whose rollback nobody can describe.
- "It's Friday afternoon, let's ship it" — or a deploy or canary-advance fired by this pass rather than by the person at the console.
Verification
- The runbook exists at its path with the six stable sections below, its word count measured against the cap.
- Every pre-launch area reads cleared-by-this-evidence or outstanding-and-needs-this; a blank one reads as cleared.
- Every rollout stage carries an audience, a window, a watcher and a way back; every rollback route its triggers, steps, data consequences and time to roll back.
- The thresholds name the baseline and the success measure they were read against, and the flag its owner and removal date — or the runbook says there is no flag service and what replaces it.
- Every derived value reads
derived, and every default matches onedocs/session-log.mdentry. - The
Deploy fencereadsExecuted by: human, post-merge, and no deploy, rollout, canary or rollback command ran here — the work ends at the written runbook, not at the deploy. - Any release step with no rollback reads as a stop-list item in the runbook, with no rollback invented for it.
Outputs & handoff
docs/features/<slug>/release.md, or docs/releases/<date>-<slug>.md for a release batching several
features — cap 600 words, derived from the qa.md cap because this file has none of its own, these six
stable sections in this order. Report the measured count against the cap; an over-cap runbook is trimmed
before it is handed over, never passed on as if it fit.
# Release — <feature or date>
## Pre-launch checklist area → cleared by <evidence> | outstanding: <what it needs>
## Feature-flag plan name · owner · removal date · off → team → canary → full → flag and dead path deleted
## Staged-rollout plan stage · audience · window · who watches · the way back, then
| Signal | Advance | Hold | Roll back | — baseline named, bound to prd.md's success measure
## Rollback plan per route: triggers · steps · what happens to data · time to roll back
## Monitoring setup dashboards and alerts to watch · the first-hour checks
## Deploy fence `Executed by: human, post-merge` — every deploy, flag enable, canary advance
and rollback above is a person's stepNo skill reads release.md; its consumer is the person running the deploy. No pull request waits for it.
Appended to docs/session-log.md: one entry per default taken, cap 60 words; shape and append rules
in state-schema.md.
Returned in conversation: the runbook's path and its measured word count, and any step the runbook names as a stop-list item.
Nothing else. No STATE.md row — release-level work owns no slice, the caller owning any transition
(state-schema.md); no code, no CI or deploy configuration (ci-cd),
no merge, no command that deploys, advances a rollout or rolls one back.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

