campaign-review
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Prepare Simplified social drafts for client, stakeholder, or team review and manage approval-ready revisions. Use when the user asks to package selected or all drafts for approval, create and present a social review link or review bundle, collect a campaign for client review, inspect draft status, revise selected drafts, or prepare approved content for a later publishing step.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Walsworth-Group/physkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Walsworth-Group/physkit★ 7same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- content-repurposerSkill
- creative-testingSkill
- cross-platform-campaignSkill
- edit-imageSkill
- evergreen-content-engineSkill
- generate-imageSkill
- generate-videoSkill
- generate-voiceoverSkill
- local-business-marketingSkill
- manage-assetsSkill
- manage-brandSkill
- manage-projectsSkill
- repurpose-videoSkill
- simplified-agentsSkill
- simplified-cliSkill
- simplified-project-managementSkill
- simplified-socialSkill
- simplified-workflowsSkill
- simplified-workspaceSkill
- social-content-plannerSkill
- social-performance-analystSkill
- transcribe-mediaSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Create a shareable review bundle when the user explicitly asks to package or send drafts for review.
- Distinctive: line 18
Do not expose internal IDs as the primary presentation.
- Very specific: line 20
Stop on 401 or when Simplified is not connected.
- Distinctive: line 32
If exact draft IDs are already known, reuse them only after verifying they belong to the selected client scope.
- Very specific: line 41
If the user explicitly asks for all drafts, select every connected account in the resolved client scope.
- Very specific: line 60
When authorized, call social_createSocialMediaReviewBundle once with title, optional description, all selected draft IDs in draft_ids, and …
- Very specific: line 64
Verify which drafts were included and return the response's linkToReview URL plus a concise manifest.
- Very specific: line 73
If the user later approves publication, hand off to $simplified-social: show the final account/date/media matrix and obtain explicit …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Campaign Review
Turn a group of social drafts into a clear approval package without publishing them.
Guardrails
- A review bundle is not publishing authorization. Never schedule or queue posts from approval language alone.
- Create a shareable review bundle when the user explicitly asks to package or send drafts for review. Otherwise preview the proposed bundle first.
- For agencies or multi-client work, create one review bundle per client and campaign. Never combine drafts from different clients, workspaces, or teamspaces in the same bundle.
- Modify only drafts the user selected or changes they approved.
- Do not expose internal IDs as the primary presentation; use names, channels, dates, and short copy previews.
- Present returned review URLs as clickable links, never embedded content.
- Stop on
401or when Simplified is not connected.
Workflow
- Establish the client, campaign or review scope, reviewer, desired deadline, and which drafts should be included. Infer scope from the active campaign only when unambiguous.
- For a named client workspace or teamspace, hand off first to
$simplified-workspace: callapi_getWorkspaceInfo, resolve the exact numeric teamspace ID withapi_listTeamspaceswhen needed, state the selected client context, and pass the samespace_idon every downstream account, draft, update, and review-bundle call. Re-resolve context when switching clients. - If exact draft IDs are already known, reuse them only after verifying they belong
to the selected client scope. Otherwise call
social_getSocialMediaAccounts, select the relevant account IDs, then callsocial_getSocialMediaDraftswith those IDs as the required comma-separatedaccount_idsstring. If that multi-account lookup returns no rows when drafts are expected, use the read-only per-account fallback: query each selected account separately, merge the results, and deduplicate by exact draft ID. Never create replacement drafts, invent draft IDs, assume that every draft belongs in the bundle, or reuse IDs from another client scope.- If the user explicitly asks for all drafts, select every connected account
in the resolved client scope. Retrieve every draft page for those accounts,
using
per_page: 100and incrementingpageuntil the response is exhausted. Apply the per-account fallback when needed, merge the results, and deduplicate by exact draft ID. This covers drafts discoverable for connected accounts in the resolved client scope. Accountless drafts can exist, but the current listing requires account IDs and does not establish coverage of accountless drafts. Disclose this limitation rather than claiming complete workspace coverage; include separately supplied draft IDs only after scoped verification.
- If the user explicitly asks for all drafts, select every connected account
in the resolved client scope. Retrieve every draft page for those accounts,
using
- Present a review manifest with client/teamspace, draft, channel/account, copy preview, media status, planned timing, and issues requiring attention. If the user did not identify the drafts, let them choose from this manifest before creating the bundle.
- Apply requested supported changes with
social_updateSocialMediaDraft: its current schema acceptsdraft_id,message,media,tags,date,time, andtimezone. Carry the selectedspace_id. Account reassignment and platformadditionalsettings are not exposed by this update operation. Explain that limitation; create a replacement draft only when explicitly requested, retaining the original unless its removal is separately authorized. - When authorized, call
social_createSocialMediaReviewBundleonce withtitle, optionaldescription, all selected draft IDs indraft_ids, and the samespace_id. Use a client-identifying title such asClient — Campaign — Review round. - Verify which drafts were included and return the response's
linkToReviewURL plus a concise manifest. For an “all drafts” request, state the total discovered, included, excluded, and failed counts so the user can verify completeness. Keep a separate bundle/link record for each client. - For an authorized append, use
social_addDraftsToSocialMediaReviewBundlewhen exposed, with the verifiedbundle_id, nonempty selecteddraft_ids, and the samespace_id. The current operation is idempotent. Inspect the returned full draft list and review URL. If the deployed client lacks this tool, explain the limitation; do not silently recreate or replace the bundle. - If the user later approves publication, hand off to
$simplified-social: show the final account/date/media matrix and obtain explicit publishing confirmation beforescheduleoradd_to_queueunless the user already approved that unchanged concrete matrix. Review approval alone is insufficient.
Review Checklist
- Copy: factual accuracy, brand voice, CTA, spelling, and platform length.
- Targeting: correct connected account and audience setting.
- Media: present, accessible, and valid for the selected post type.
- Timing: intended date, verified scheduling timezone, campaign order, and no past dates.
- Platform requirements: all required
additionalfields are present. - Campaign consistency: offer, link, naming, visual identity, and legal terms agree across drafts.
- Client isolation: every draft, account, and bundle belongs to the same resolved workspace/teamspace; no cross-client IDs or assets are present.
Output
Report the client/teamspace, bundle name, included and excluded drafts, unresolved issues, and the review URL. State clearly that the content remains in review and has not been published or scheduled.
For an explicit “create a review bundle of all drafts and present it” request, creating the bundle is authorized: do not stop at a hypothetical preview. Complete the scoped draft collection, create the bundle once, and present its clickable review link and manifest.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

