workflow-commit
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draft commit messages, prepare staging, or create requested commits from the relevant changes.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ovargas/virtual-teamtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fimoklei/pm-ai-playbooktheir own version, first seen May 31, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- fimoklei/pm-ai-playbook★ 42same name
- ovargas/virtual-team★ 14same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- workflow-artifactSkill
- workflow-docsSkill
- workflow-orchestrateSkill
- workflow-prSkill
- workflow-reviewSkill
- workflow-worktreeSkill
The file
Files
Commit
Match the work to the request: wording, a staging plan, or commit creation. Reuse current diffs and conventions; inspect repository status and affected changes when needed to establish scope and ownership. Read recent commit style only when the convention is unknown.
Group files or hunks by cohesive intent, preserving unrelated work and staging. Tests and documentation belong with the behavior they support. Prefer English Conventional Commits unless user or project choices differ; branch prefixes do not determine commit types.
A message or plan request is read-only. A commit request includes necessary staging, but not amending, bypassing hooks, pushing or publication. Before committing, verify the staged scope and use sufficient checks for the changes, reusing current results. Report the resulting hash, included scope and relevant remaining work.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.