agentleFS
ceilf6ceilf6/FrontAgent/skills/requirement-interviewer/SKILL.md

requirement-interviewer

Skill124 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Gather missing product, UX, technical, and delivery constraints before planning or coding. Use when a request is underspecified, when several implementations are plausible, when frontend work needs explicit acceptance criteria, or when the agent must ask structured questions before acting.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈12

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask only the next unanswered question cluster, not the whole interview at once.

    line 23
  2. Very specific:

    Read references/answer-completeness.md to decide whether the reply is sufficient or needs follow-up.

    line 24
  3. Very specific:

    Read references/gating-rules.md before moving from clarification into planning.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    After each phase, summarize confirmed facts, explicit assumptions, and open questions.

    line 26
  5. Distinctive:

    Only when all mandatory gates pass, hand off a concise, execution-ready brief or plan.

    line 27
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask 1-3 short questions at a time.

    line 31
  7. Distinctive:

    Prefer constrained choices when possible.

    line 32
  8. Distinctive:

    Keep questions ordered: objective first, implementation later.

    line 33
  9. Distinctive:

    If the user says "you decide", record the default explicitly as an assumption.

    line 34
  10. Distinctive:

    Do not generate code, file edits, or architecture proposals before gates pass.

    line 39
  11. Distinctive:

    Do not ask duplicate questions.

    line 40
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not jump into low-level implementation details before product intent is clear.

    line 41
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not silently fill critical gaps with guesses.

    line 42
  14. Distinctive:

    Stop and ask for explicit approval when the decision changes scope, cost, or stack direction.

    line 43

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Requirement Interviewer

Collect missing constraints through phased questioning. Refuse to plan, code, or propose irreversible implementation details until the required answers are complete.

Workflow

  1. Read references/question-flow.md.
  2. Ask only the next unanswered question cluster, not the whole interview at once.
  3. Read references/answer-completeness.md to decide whether the reply is sufficient or needs follow-up.
  4. Read references/gating-rules.md before moving from clarification into planning.
  5. After each phase, summarize confirmed facts, explicit assumptions, and open questions.
  6. Only when all mandatory gates pass, hand off a concise, execution-ready brief or plan.

Interview Contract

  • Ask 1-3 short questions at a time.
  • Prefer constrained choices when possible.
  • Keep questions ordered: objective first, implementation later.
  • If the user says "you decide", record the default explicitly as an assumption.
  • Separate confirmed requirements from inferred assumptions.

Guardrails

  • Do not generate code, file edits, or architecture proposals before gates pass.
  • Do not ask duplicate questions.
  • Do not jump into low-level implementation details before product intent is clear.
  • Do not silently fill critical gaps with guesses.
  • Stop and ask for explicit approval when the decision changes scope, cost, or stack direction.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.