pr-report
Skill10 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
PR health report for a GitHub repo: open queue, review, size, flow.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Hans010101/bitworldtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- ever-works/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- openshift/hypershifttheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- paperclipai/papercliptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- jugol/workcelltheir own version, first seen Jul 4, 2026
- microsoft/amplifier-app-papercliptheir own version, first seen Jun 5, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- paperclipai/paperclip★ 112ksame name
- openshift/hypershift★ 551same name
- ancilis/bedlam★ 15same name
- ever-works/skills★ 1same name
- Hans010101/bitworld★ 1same name
- jpoindexter/theft-kit★ 1same name
- jugol/workcell★ 1same name
- microsoft/amplifier-app-paperclip★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agents-md-improverSkill
- ai-tutorialSkill
- deassembleSkill
- excalidraw-diagramSkill
- find-overlapping-skillsSkill
- first-principlesSkill
- humanizerSkill
- improve-skillsSkill
- local-artifactSkill
- loom-transcriptSkill
- manage-contextSkill
- organize-skill-mcpSkill
- pair-consultSkill
- pair-optimizeSkill
- pair-ratchetSkill
- pr-classifySkill
- scan-sessions-and-learnSkill
- simplify-pythonSkill
- skill-flowSkill
- slack-commSkill
- socratesSkill
- step-by-stepSkill
- sub-consultSkill
- to-dbmlSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
No repo → the current one.
- Very specific: line 25
If the output says +N more, offer --html: the full queue grouped by who it waits on, with links and a size × cycle-time chart.
- Very specific: line 39
Read from a commit status with context pr-classify on the PR's head commit (description safe to merge / nice to review / reject to merge).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
pr-report
PRs that sit are invisible until someone asks. Cycle time only counts PRs that merged, so a dashboard that leads with it looks healthy while the queue rots. This report leads with the open queue (who each PR is waiting on), then flow, review, risk, and the contribution workflow (/pr → /pr-classify).
Run
python3 -I ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pr_report.py [owner/repo] [--all] [--html]No repo → the current one. Use a 300000 ms Bash timeout: busy repos take up to ~1 min. Read-only: it never writes to GitHub.
Relay
- Paste stdout verbatim. Bash output is collapsed in the UI, and the numbers only mean something with their
n, grade and N/A markers; a paraphrase drops those and turns N/A into 0. - Then at most 3 "do next" lines, each naming a PR number or a person from a 🔴 row. Don't add metrics the script didn't compute.
- If the output says
+N more, offer--html: the full queue grouped by who it waits on, with links and a size × cycle-time chart.
Why the numbers look the way they do
- Median and p75 with n, never the mean. PR times are heavily skewed. Below n=10 the raw values are listed ungraded; grades start at n≥20.
- N/A is not 0. A repo with no CI has no "0% red CI".
- Solo mode hides pickup and review rows: when one author self-merges everything, the PR is a merge button, not a queue. PR coverage and
/pradoption replace them. - Bots and AI reviewers are counted apart. They review in minutes and would make pickup look elite.
- Idle comes from human events, not
updatedAt, which bots and label changes keep fresh.
Definitions, thresholds and sources: references/metrics.md.
/pr-classify verdicts
Read from a commit status with context pr-classify on the PR's head commit (description safe to merge / nice to review / reject to merge). Until pr-classify writes one, that row shows N/A.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.