Research Literature Review

Research topic: $ARGUMENTS

Constants

• REVIEWER_BACKEND = codex — Default: Codex MCP (xhigh). Override with — reviewer: oracle-pro for GPT-5.4 Pro via Oracle MCP. See shared-references/reviewer-routing.md.
• PAPER_LIBRARY — Local directory containing user's paper collection (PDFs). Check these paths in order:
  1. papers/ in the current project directory
  2. literature/ in the current project directory
  3. Custom path specified by user in CLAUDE.md under ## Paper Library
• MAX_LOCAL_PAPERS = 20 — Maximum number of local PDFs to scan (read first 3 pages each). If more are found, prioritize by filename relevance to the topic.
• ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = false — When true, download top 3-5 most relevant arXiv PDFs to PAPER_LIBRARY after search. When false (default), only fetch metadata (title, abstract, authors) via arXiv API — no files are downloaded.
• ARXIV_MAX_DOWNLOAD = 5 — Maximum number of PDFs to download when ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = true.

💡 Overrides:

• /research-lit "topic" — paper library: ~/my_papers/ — custom local PDF path
• /research-lit "topic" — sources: zotero, local — only search Zotero + local PDFs
• /research-lit "topic" — sources: zotero — only search Zotero
• /research-lit "topic" — sources: web — only search the web (skip all local)
• /research-lit "topic" — sources: web, semantic-scholar — also search Semantic Scholar for published venue papers (IEEE, ACM, etc.)
• /research-lit "topic" — sources: deepxiv — only search via DeepXiv progressive retrieval
• /research-lit "topic" — sources: all, deepxiv — use default sources plus DeepXiv
• /research-lit "topic" — arxiv download: true — download top relevant arXiv PDFs
• /research-lit "topic" — arxiv download: true, max download: 10 — download up to 10 PDFs

Discipline-Aware Mode

At startup, check for PRISM_PROFILE.md in the project root. If found, load it and adapt behavior:

1. Source priority: Replace the default source order with the discipline's Literature Sources table. For example:
   • Law → CNKI, PKULaw/Westlaw, HeinOnline, SSRN, Google Scholar
   • Economics → NBER, SSRN, EconLit, Google Scholar, CNKI
   • Medicine → PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI
   • Communications → IEEE Xplore, arXiv, Semantic Scholar, ACM DL
2. Venue filtering: When ranking papers, prioritize those from the discipline's Tier A venues.
3. Time window: Humanities and law may need wider time windows (foundational works from decades ago are still highly relevant). ML focuses on last 2-3 years.
4. Search terminology: Adapt search queries to use discipline-appropriate terminology and databases.
5. Output format: For law, include jurisdiction and court level in the paper table. For medicine, include study design (RCT, cohort, etc.) and evidence level.

If PRISM_PROFILE.md does not exist, fall back to the default behavior below (fully backward compatible).

See shared-references/prism-routing.md for the full routing protocol.

Data Sources

This skill checks multiple sources in priority order. All are optional — if a source is not configured or not requested, skip it silently.

Source Selection

Parse $ARGUMENTS for a — sources: directive:

• If — sources: is specified: Only search the listed sources (comma-separated). Valid values: zotero, obsidian, local, web, semantic-scholar, deepxiv, exa, all.
• If not specified: Default to all — search every available source in priority order (semantic-scholar, deepxiv, and exa are excluded from all; they must be explicitly listed).

Examples:

/research-lit "diffusion models"                                    → all (default, no S2)
/research-lit "diffusion models" — sources: all                     → all (default, no S2)
/research-lit "diffusion models" — sources: zotero                  → Zotero only
/research-lit "diffusion models" — sources: zotero, web             → Zotero + web
/research-lit "diffusion models" — sources: local                   → local PDFs only
/research-lit "topic" — sources: obsidian, local, web               → skip Zotero
/research-lit "topic" — sources: web, semantic-scholar              → web + S2 API (IEEE/ACM venue papers)
/research-lit "topic" — sources: deepxiv                            → DeepXiv only
/research-lit "topic" — sources: all, deepxiv                       → default sources + DeepXiv
/research-lit "topic" — sources: all, semantic-scholar              → all + S2 API
/research-lit "topic" — sources: exa                               → Exa only (broad web + content extraction)
/research-lit "topic" — sources: all, exa                          → default sources + Exa web search

Source Table

Graceful degradation: If no MCP servers are configured, the skill works exactly as before (local PDFs + web search). Zotero and Obsidian are pure additions.

Workflow

Step 0a: Search Zotero Library (if available)

Skip this step entirely if Zotero MCP is not configured.

Try calling a Zotero MCP tool (e.g., search). If it succeeds:

1. Search by topic: Use the Zotero search tool to find papers matching the research topic
2. Read collections: Check if the user has a relevant collection/folder for this topic
3. Extract annotations: For highly relevant papers, pull PDF highlights and notes — these represent what the user found important
4. Export BibTeX: Get citation data for relevant papers (useful for /paper-write later)
5. Compile results: For each relevant Zotero entry, extract:
   • Title, authors, year, venue
   • User's annotations/highlights (if any)
   • Tags the user assigned
   • Which collection it belongs to

📚 Zotero annotations are gold — they show what the user personally highlighted as important, which is far more valuable than generic summaries.

Step 0b: Search Obsidian Vault (if available)

Skip this step entirely if Obsidian MCP is not configured.

Try calling an Obsidian MCP tool (e.g., search). If it succeeds:

1. Search vault: Search for notes related to the research topic
2. Check tags: Look for notes tagged with relevant topics (e.g., #diffusion-models, #paper-review)
3. Read research notes: For relevant notes, extract the user's own summaries and insights
4. Follow links: If notes link to other relevant notes (wikilinks), follow them for additional context
5. Compile results: For each relevant note:
   • Note title and path
   • User's summary/insights
   • Links to other notes (research graph)
   • Any frontmatter metadata (paper URL, status, rating)

📝 Obsidian notes represent the user's processed understanding — more valuable than raw paper content for understanding their perspective.

Step 0c: Scan Local Paper Library

Before searching online, check if the user already has relevant papers locally:

1. Locate library: Check PAPER_LIBRARY paths for PDF files

   Glob: papers/**/*.pdf, literature/**/*.pdf

2. De-duplicate against Zotero: If Step 0a found papers, skip any local PDFs already covered by Zotero results (match by filename or title).
3. Filter by relevance: Match filenames and first-page content against the research topic. Skip clearly unrelated papers.
4. Summarize relevant papers: For each relevant local PDF (up to MAX_LOCAL_PAPERS):
   • Read first 3 pages (title, abstract, intro)
   • Extract: title, authors, year, core contribution, relevance to topic
   • Flag papers that are directly related vs tangentially related
5. Build local knowledge base: Compile summaries into a "papers you already have" section. This becomes the starting point — external search fills the gaps.

📚 If no local papers are found, skip to Step 1. If the user has a comprehensive local collection, the external search can be more targeted (focus on what's missing).

Step 1: Search (external)

• Use WebSearch to find recent papers on the topic
• Check arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar
• Focus on papers from last 2 years unless studying foundational work
• De-duplicate: Skip papers already found in Zotero, Obsidian, or local library

arXiv API search (always runs, no download by default):

Locate the fetch script and search arXiv directly:

# Try to find arxiv_fetch.py
SCRIPT=$(find tools/ -name "arxiv_fetch.py" 2>/dev/null | head -1)
# If not found, check Prism install
[ -z "$SCRIPT" ] && SCRIPT=$(find ~/.claude/skills/arxiv/ -name "arxiv_fetch.py" 2>/dev/null | head -1)

# Search arXiv API for structured results (title, abstract, authors, categories)
python3 "$SCRIPT" search "QUERY" --max 10

If arxiv_fetch.py is not found, fall back to WebSearch for arXiv (same as before).

The arXiv API returns structured metadata (title, abstract, full author list, categories, dates) — richer than WebSearch snippets. Merge these results with WebSearch findings and de-duplicate.

Semantic Scholar API search (only when semantic-scholar is in sources):

When the user explicitly requests — sources: semantic-scholar (or — sources: web, semantic-scholar), search for published venue papers beyond arXiv:

S2_SCRIPT=$(find tools/ -name "semantic_scholar_fetch.py" 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -z "$S2_SCRIPT" ] && S2_SCRIPT=$(find ~/.claude/skills/semantic-scholar/ -name "semantic_scholar_fetch.py" 2>/dev/null | head -1)

# Search for published CS/Engineering papers with quality filters
python3 "$S2_SCRIPT" search "QUERY" --max 10 \
  --fields-of-study "Computer Science,Engineering" \
  --publication-types "JournalArticle,Conference"

If semantic_scholar_fetch.py is not found, skip silently.

Why use Semantic Scholar? Many IEEE/ACM journal papers are NOT on arXiv. S2 fills the gap for published venue-only papers with citation counts and venue metadata.

De-duplication between arXiv and S2: Match by arXiv ID (S2 returns externalIds.ArXiv):

• If a paper appears in both: check S2's venue/publicationVenue — if it has been published in a journal/conference (e.g. IEEE TWC, JSAC), use S2's metadata (venue, citationCount, DOI) as the authoritative version, since the published version supersedes the preprint. Keep the arXiv PDF link for download.
• If the S2 match has no venue (still just a preprint indexed by S2): keep the arXiv version as-is.
• S2 results without externalIds.ArXiv are venue-only papers not on arXiv — these are the unique value of this source.

Exa search (only when exa is in sources):

When the user explicitly requests — sources: exa (or includes exa in a combined source list), use the Exa tool for broad AI-powered web search with content extraction:

EXA_SCRIPT=$(find tools/ -name "exa_search.py" 2>/dev/null | head -1)

# Search for research papers with highlights
python3 "$EXA_SCRIPT" search "QUERY" --max 10 --category "research paper" --content highlights

# Search for broader web content (blogs, docs, news)
python3 "$EXA_SCRIPT" search "QUERY" --max 10 --content highlights

If tools/exa_search.py or the exa-py SDK is unavailable, skip this source gracefully and continue with the remaining requested sources.

Why use Exa? Exa provides AI-powered search across the broader web (blogs, documentation, news, company pages) with built-in content extraction. It fills a gap between academic databases (arXiv, S2) and generic WebSearch by returning richer content with each result.

De-duplication against arXiv, S2, and DeepXiv:

• Match by URL first, then normalized title
• If Exa returns an arXiv paper already found by arXiv/S2, prefer the structured metadata from those sources
• Exa results from non-academic domains (blogs, docs, news) are unique value not covered by other sources

Optional PDF download (only when ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = true):

After all sources are searched and papers are ranked by relevance:

# Download top N most relevant arXiv papers
python3 "$SCRIPT" download ARXIV_ID --dir papers/

• Only download papers ranked in the top ARXIV_MAX_DOWNLOAD by relevance
• Skip papers already in the local library
• 1-second delay between downloads (rate limiting)
• Verify each PDF > 10 KB

Step 2: Analyze Each Paper

For each relevant paper (from all sources), extract:

• Problem: What gap does it address?
• Method: Core technical contribution (1-2 sentences)
• Results: Key numbers/claims
• Relevance: How does it relate to our work?
• Source: Where we found it (Zotero/Obsidian/local/web) — helps user know what they already have vs what's new

Step 3: Synthesize

• Group papers by approach/theme
• Identify consensus vs disagreements in the field
• Find gaps that our work could fill
• If Obsidian notes exist, incorporate the user's own insights into the synthesis

Step 4: Output

Present as a structured literature table:

| Paper | Venue | Method | Key Result | Relevance to Us | Source |
|-------|-------|--------|------------|-----------------|--------|

Plus a narrative summary of the landscape (3-5 paragraphs).

If Zotero BibTeX was exported, include a references.bib snippet for direct use in paper writing.

Step 5: Save (if requested)

• Save paper PDFs to literature/ or papers/
• Update related work notes in project memory
• If Obsidian is available, optionally create a literature review note in the vault

Step 6: Update Research Wiki

Required when research-wiki/ exists. Skip entirely (no action, no error) if the directory is absent. Per shared-references/integration-contract.md, this step follows the canonical ingest contract — business logic lives in tools/research_wiki.py, not in this prose.

📋 Research Wiki ingest (runs once, at end of research-lit):
   [ ] 1. Predicate: `research-wiki/` exists? If no, skip this step.
   [ ] 2. For each of the top 8–12 relevant papers (arxiv IDs collected above):
          python3 tools/research_wiki.py ingest_paper research-wiki/ \
              --arxiv-id <id> [--thesis "<one-line>"] [--tags <t1>,<t2>]
   [ ] 3. For each explicit relationship to an existing wiki entity,
          add an edge:
          python3 tools/research_wiki.py add_edge research-wiki/ \
              --from "paper:<slug>" --to "<target_node_id>" \
              --type <extends|contradicts|addresses_gap|inspired_by|...> \
              --evidence "<one-sentence quote or reasoning>"
   [ ] 4. Confirm papers/<slug>.md files were created (helper prints
          "Paper ingested: ..."); if any failed with a network error,
          retry or fall back to the --title/--authors/--year manual form.

ingest_paper handles slug generation, arXiv metadata fetch, dedup (skips an existing paper by arXiv id), page rendering, index.md rebuild, query_pack.md rebuild, and log append in a single call — do not manually write papers/<slug>.md. If the helper is unavailable (e.g., offline on a non-Prism machine), log the gap and let /research-wiki sync --arxiv-ids … backfill later.

For non-arXiv sources (Semantic Scholar only, IEEE/ACM journals without arXiv mirrors, blog posts), pass manual metadata instead:

python3 tools/research_wiki.py ingest_paper research-wiki/ \
    --title "<full title>" --authors "A, B, C" --year <yyyy> \
    --venue "<venue>" [--external-id-doi "<doi>"] [--thesis "..."]

Key Rules

• Always include paper citations (authors, year, venue)
• Distinguish between peer-reviewed and preprints
• Be honest about limitations of each paper
• Note if a paper directly competes with or supports our approach
• Never fail because a MCP server is not configured — always fall back gracefully to the next data source
• Zotero/Obsidian tools may have different names depending on how the user configured the MCP server (e.g., mcp__zotero__search or mcp__zotero-mcp__search_items). Try the most common patterns and adapt.