tester-agent
Skill0 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub
Orchestrates a three-phase software tester workflow for backlog items: (1) create and write a test plan from a backlog item, with or without application code, (2) write tests and run them one by one, (3) run the full relevant test suite and write CLI-compatible reports (test-plan.md, report.md, report.json, report.csv). Use when the user asks to test a backlog item, run the tester agent skill, create a test plan then tests, or copy the tester workflow into a project.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- roronoazoroshao369/vibe-coding-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- roronoazoroshao369/vibe-coding-os★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- npm-testSkill
- refactorSkill
- security-auditSkill
- tester-planSkill
- tester-run-testsSkill
- tester-write-testsSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
Do not edit files under templates/ in this skill when adapting a project — copy overrides into .tester-agent/ instead.
- Very specific: line 60
start of a phase, including mode (pre-implementation or post-implementation)
- Distinctive: line 65
Keep each line to one path or one command.
- Distinctive: line 71
Leave every file you did not create for this test run untouched, including unrelated dirty application files.
- Very specific: line 72
Do not treat those edits as a failure or policy_violation.
- Distinctive: line 73
Do not run git restore, git checkout, git reset, git clean, git stash, or any other command that reverts or discards working-tree changes.
- Distinctive: line 77
Follow phases in order. After each phase, update the checklist in the workflow template.
- Very specific: line 87
Start → read tester-plan and execute Fase 1.
- Very specific: line 88
When test-plan.md exists and Fase 1 is done → read tester-write-tests and execute Fase 2.
- Very specific: line 89
When Fase 2 is done → read tester-run-tests and execute Fase 3.
- Very specific: line 90
Stop when report.md, report.json, and report.csv exist.
- Distinctive: line 92
If the user asks for only a plan, run Fase 1 and stop.
- Distinctive: line 93
If the user asks for only running tests, run Fase 3 (requires existing plan / commands).
- Distinctive: line 97
Use the CLI run-id format:
- Distinctive: line 120
Always use the scripts under scripts/ so formatting stays identical to the CLI.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Tester Agent
Portable Cursor skill package. Routes a backlog-item test run through three subskills.
Report artefacts match the CLI (src/reports.ts) — see reports.md.
When to use
- User asks to test a backlog item / story.
- User asks for the tester-agent workflow (plan → write tests → run).
- User wants a repeatable tester process without the CLI app.
Read first
- workflow/template.md — copy the checklist and fill it in.
- reports.md — required filenames and formats (same as CLI).
- test-design.md — what Fase 1 must put in the test plan.
- Project overrides in
.tester-agent/if present; else bundled templates/workflow/. - Prompt shapes in templates/prompts/.
Do not edit files under templates/ in this skill when adapting a project — copy overrides into .tester-agent/ instead.
Effort
This skill cannot switch the Cursor model or the effort setting. Stay on the model the user already selected. For the steps below, reason at high effort before writing anything: consider the backlog, the applicable code, and alternatives, then choose.
| Step | Effort |
| Fase 1: mode, scope, technique per surface, pairwise, edge cases, error contract, open questions | high |
| Fase 2: classify a failure as a test bug or an application bug | high |
| Fase 2: write the next planned test once that choice is made | normal |
| Fase 3: run commands and record exit codes | normal |
Say the effort in the progress line when a high-effort step starts, for example [fase 1] effort: high.
Zichtbare voortgang
The user is often in another chat or another part of the app. Say what this run is doing in the chat, and append the same line to $REPORT_DIR/progress.log. Do this at the moment it happens, not in a summary at the end.
msg="[fase 1] geschreven: .tester-agent/reports/${RUN_ID}/test-plan.md"
printf '%s\n' "$msg" | tee -a "$REPORT_DIR/progress.log"Then repeat that line in the chat.
Required moments:
- start of a phase, including mode (
pre-implementationorpost-implementation) - each file read for the plan or the tests (path only)
- each file written (path only)
- each test command, then its exit code
Keep each line to one path or one command. Do not paste file contents or test output into the progress log.
Parallel work
The user may keep editing other application code while this skill runs. That is expected.
- Leave every file you did not create for this test run untouched, including unrelated dirty application files.
- Do not treat those edits as a failure or
policy_violation. - Do not run
git restore,git checkout,git reset,git clean,git stash, or any other command that reverts or discards working-tree changes. A failing test stays a failed or residual-risk result.
Workflow
Follow phases in order. After each phase, update the checklist in the workflow template.
| Phase | Subskill | Goal |
| 1 | tester-plan | Backlog only, or backlog + code → write test-plan.md |
| 2 | tester-write-tests | Write tests one by one → agent-summary.md |
| 3 | tester-run-tests | Run suite → report.md + report.json + report.csv |
Routing
- Start → read
tester-planand execute Fase 1. - When
test-plan.mdexists and Fase 1 is done → readtester-write-testsand execute Fase 2. - When Fase 2 is done → read
tester-run-testsand execute Fase 3. - Stop when
report.md,report.json, andreport.csvexist.
If the user asks for only a plan, run Fase 1 and stop.
If the user asks for only running tests, run Fase 3 (requires existing plan / commands).
Run id and reports
Use the CLI run-id format:
RUN_ID="$(node -e "const {randomUUID}=require('crypto'); process.stdout.write(new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g,'-')+'-'+randomUUID().slice(0,8))")"
REPORT_DIR=".tester-agent/reports/${RUN_ID}"
mkdir -p "$REPORT_DIR"Final artefacts (same as CLI):
| File | Writer |
$REPORT_DIR/test-plan.md | scripts/write-test-plan.mjs (Fase 1) |
$REPORT_DIR/report.md | scripts/write-final-report.mjs (Fase 3) |
$REPORT_DIR/report.json | same |
$REPORT_DIR/report.csv | same |
Skill handoff only (not a CLI file):
| File | Phase |
$REPORT_DIR/agent-summary.md | Fase 2 → becomes agentSummary in report.json / ## Summary in report.md |
Always use the scripts under scripts/ so formatting stays identical to the CLI.
Subskills
- tester-plan
- tester-write-tests
- tester-run-tests
Install into another project
cp -a .cursor/skills/tester-agent \
.cursor/skills/tester-plan \
.cursor/skills/tester-write-tests \
.cursor/skills/tester-run-tests \
/path/to/project/.cursor/skills/Optional: add project-specific .tester-agent/*.md overrides (leave skill templates/ untouched).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

