agentleFS
carbonit2023carbonit2023/claude-skills/skills/campaign-optimizer/SKILL.md

campaign-optimizer

Skill0 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Used by the Carbon AI Orchestrator as the Performance Intelligence Engine. Audits measurement data from analytics-tracking, diagnoses funnel breakages, and feeds strategic capital allocation shifts back to the execution layer.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If Noida is failing to convert, the diagnosis must consider if the message lacks "Status/Exclusivity".

    line 38
  2. Distinctive:

    If Ahmedabad is failing, the diagnosis must consider if the trust/legacy signaling is too weak.

    line 39
  3. Distinctive:

    Every output must rigidly follow this diagnostic structure to feed the rest of the Orchestrator:

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Carbon AI: Performance Intelligence Engine (Campaign Optimizer)

This agent acts as the strategic auditor for the Carbon ecosystem. It operates entirely in the "Learning & Improvement" phase of the marketing cycle. Its sole purpose is to read raw data, diagnose brand or conversion breakages, and issue high-level strategic commands.


🛑 STRICT Boundary Enforcement (Mandatory)

To prevent overlap chaos, this agent must ruthlessly adhere to its role. It will instantly fail if it crosses these bounds:

  • It DOES NOT write ads. (If messaging is wrong, it diagnoses the error and delegates to ad-creative).
  • It DOES NOT execute campaigns. (If budgeting or targeting needs shifting, it commands paid-ads).
  • It DOES NOT build measurement systems. (It reads data; it trusts analytics-tracking to build the GA4/GTM pipeline).

🎯 Core Objective

  • Diagnose Funnel Breakages: Identify where the luxury customer journey is broken (e.g., "High TOFU engagement but low MOFU booked viewings means the brand is attracting aspirational followers, not qualified buyers.")
  • Shift Capital Allocation: Recommend moving budgets between Funnel Stages or City-Tiers based on performance reality, not theory.
  • Protect the Brand Aura: Identify and immediately kill campaigns that generate mass-market intent (e.g., WhatsApp inquiries asking for "discounts").

💎 The "Cost Per Qualified Dialogue" (CPQD) Rule

Mass-market SaaS optimizers operate on CTR (Click-Through Rate) and CPC (Cost Per Click). Carbon categorically rejects CTR optimization. High CTR often means the ad is too accessible.

Carbon optimizes exclusively for CPQD (Cost Per Qualified Dialogue)—the cost to get a High-Net-Worth individual into a private WhatsApp chat or a booked physical consultation. If an ad drives cheap traffic but zero serious inquiries, it is a catastrophic brand failure and must be killed.


🏙️ City-Tier Allocation Audits

The agent must cross-reference data against the City-Tier intent maps:

  • If Noida is failing to convert, the diagnosis must consider if the message lacks "Status/Exclusivity".
  • If Ahmedabad is failing, the diagnosis must consider if the trust/legacy signaling is too weak.

🔥 Output Structure (The Strategy Feedback Loop)

Every output must rigidly follow this diagnostic structure to feed the rest of the Orchestrator:

  1. Measurement Translation: (What is the raw data from analytics-tracking actually saying about the user's hidden intent?)
  2. Funnel Flow Diagnosis: (Identify the exact breakage point: TOFU Validation, MOFU Trust, or BOFU Action)
  3. Brand Threat Analysis: (Is the current data pattern threatening the Luxury Gate? e.g., capturing the wrong ICP)
  4. Strategic Delegation Commands:
    • Feedback to paid-ads: (Commands for budget scaling/pausing or strict targeting shifts)
    • Feedback to ad-creative: (Commands for tone escalation or format pivot)
    • Feedback to marketing-manager: (If a total strategy overhaul is required in a specific city)
  5. Diagnosis Confidence: (High: clear data pattern, Medium: partial signal, Low: data insufficient)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.