mkt-copywriting
Skill0 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Persuasive writing for anything that needs to sell. Landing pages, sales pages, emails, ads, social posts, headlines, CTAs. Triggers on: "write copy for", "landing page copy", "sales page", "help me sell", "punch this up", "make this convert", "write a headline", "score this copy", "review my copy", "email copy", "ad copy". Produces multiple variants per piece, rates output on 7 quality dimensions, and recommends split tests. Loads brand voice and positioning for consistency. Does NOT trigger for content repurposing (use mkt-content-repurposing), email sequences (use mkt-email-sequences), or long-form SEO articles.
In this repository96 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- team_context/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- fin-company-cfoSkill
- fin-invoice-reconciliationSkill
- fin-month-end-reportingSkill
- fin-personal-cfoSkill
- meta-find-skillsSkill
- meta-memory-recallSkill
- meta-memory-writeSkill
- meta-skill-creatorSkill
- meta-skillifySkill
- meta-synthesize-localsSkill
- meta-toolifySkill
- meta-wrap-upSkill
- mkt-ab-testingSkill
- mkt-ad-creativeSkill
- mkt-adsSkill
- mkt-asoSkill
- mkt-brand-voiceSkill
- mkt-churn-preventionSkill
- mkt-cold-emailSkill
- mkt-co-marketingSkill
- mkt-community-marketingSkill
- mkt-content-repurposingSkill
- mkt-copy-editingSkill
- mkt-croSkill
- mkt-directory-submissionsSkill
- mkt-emailsSkill
- mkt-eventsSkill
- mkt-free-toolsSkill
- mkt-icpSkill
- mkt-influencer-marketingSkill
- mkt-jab-hookSkill
- mkt-launchSkill
- mkt-lead-magnetsSkill
- mkt-marketing-loopsSkill
- mkt-offersSkill
- mkt-onboardingSkill
- mkt-paywallsSkill
- mkt-popupsSkill
- mkt-positioningSkill
- mkt-programmatic-seoSkill
- mkt-prospectingSkill
- mkt-public-relationsSkill
- mkt-referralsSkill
- mkt-sales-enablementSkill
- mkt-schemaSkill
- mkt-signupSkill
- mkt-smsSkill
- mkt-socialSkill
- mkt-ugc-scriptsSkill
- mkt-visual-identitySkill
- ops-analyticsSkill
- ops-attributionSkill
- ops-cronSkill
- ops-ingestSkill
- ops-loopifySkill
- ops-project-managementSkill
- ops-revopsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 39
Check brand_context/ and load per the table above.
- Very specific: line 46
Read context/learnings.md → ## mkt-copywriting section.
- Distinctive: line 50
Ask or infer from context:
- Very specific: line 65
If projects/mkt-copywriting/{campaign-name}/ exists, read what's there.
- Distinctive: line 69
Before writing, confirm these (ask the user if unclear):
- Very specific: line 78
Read references/persuasion-toolkit.md and apply the techniques that fit the format:
- Distinctive: line 82
Body: Keep the reader moving — vary sentence length, bridge sections, plant unanswered questions.
- Distinctive: line 83
Evidence: Every claim needs backup. Structure results as mini-stories: who they were, what they did, what changed, how long it took.
- Very specific: line 90
Read references/variants-and-scoring.md for the full protocol.
- Very specific: line 98
Use the 7-dimension rubric from references/variants-and-scoring.md:
- Distinctive: line 104
When the user asks to "score this" or "review my copy" — score first, show weaknesses, then offer to rewrite.
- Very specific: line 108
Before saving, run all generated copy through tool-humanizer in pipeline mode.
- Distinctive: line 124
After saving, show the user actual copy excerpts — not just file paths.
- Distinctive: line 130
Ask: "Does this sound like you?
- Very specific: line 141
No proof/testimonials available: Write placeholder sections marked [ADD TESTIMONIAL].
- Distinctive: line 142
User can't articulate the transformation: Run the So What? chain with them.
- Distinctive: line 143
Copy sounds generic after generation: Check if ICP was loaded. If not, ask 2 questions about who they're writing for.
- Very specific: line 158
If the user flags an issue with the output, add a dated entry under ## Rules in this skill's SKILL.local.md (create it if missing) and log …
- Very specific: line 162
Read references/ai-os-extension.md alongside this file.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Copywriting
Good copy reads like a smart person explaining something they care about. No one notices they're being persuaded — they just keep reading because it's useful and specific. Every technique in this skill exists to serve that feeling.
Outcome
Persuasive copy saved to projects/mkt-copywriting/{campaign-name}/, scored on 7 dimensions, with multiple variants for testing. Headline variants (5-10), body variants (2-3 for long-form), and A/B test suggestions included.
Context Needs
| File | Load level | How it shapes this skill |
brand_context/voice-profile.md | full | Match tone, vocabulary, rhythm in all copy |
brand_context/positioning.md | angle only | The chosen angle determines lead, proof hierarchy, CTA framing |
brand_context/icp.md | full | Know who you're writing to: awareness level, pain points, objections |
brand_context/samples.md | yes | Reference for voice consistency |
context/learnings.md | ## mkt-copywriting section | Apply previous feedback before starting |
Load if they exist. Proceed without them if not — this skill works standalone.
Step 1: Load Context
Check brand_context/ and load per the table above. Show a brief status:
- Voice loaded: "[tone summary]. All copy will match."
- Positioning loaded: "Building around '[angle]' frame."
- ICP loaded: "Writing for [audience]. Awareness level: [level]."
- Nothing found: "No brand context yet. I'll write solid copy — we can build your brand profile anytime to make it on-brand."
Read context/learnings.md → ## mkt-copywriting section. Apply any previous corrections.
Step 2: Establish Format
Ask or infer from context:
| Format | Typical length | Structure |
| Landing page | 800-2000 words | Full sequence (see references/persuasion-toolkit.md) |
| Sales page | 2000-5000 words | Extended full sequence with founder story, FAQ |
| Under 500 words | Hook → single value → CTA | |
| Ad copy | Platform limits | Hook → benefit → CTA within char limits |
| Social post | Under 300 words | Hook → value → CTA |
| General | Custom | Apply methodology with user-specified constraints |
State which format before generating.
Step 3: Check for Existing Work
If projects/mkt-copywriting/{campaign-name}/ exists, read what's there. Show a summary and ask: "Revise existing, add a new piece, or start fresh?"
Step 4: Pre-Generation Checklist
Before writing, confirm these (ask the user if unclear):
- Audience awareness level — Schwartz 1-5 (read
references/classic-frameworks.mdfor the full model). Determines headline approach and copy length. - Core transformation — Not features. Run the "So What?" chain three levels deep until you hit something emotional or financial. Read
references/persuasion-toolkit.md§ The So What? Chain. - Proof inventory — What testimonials, data, case studies are available?
- Positioning angle — From brand_context or stated by user.
Step 5: Write the Copy
Read references/persuasion-toolkit.md and apply the techniques that fit the format:
- Headlines: Generate 5-10 using different angles (outcome, curiosity, proof, contrarian, story). Star your recommendation.
- Openings: Pick the entry style that best matches the audience's awareness level. Scene-setting for cold audiences, data or challenge for warm ones.
- Body: Keep the reader moving — vary sentence length, bridge sections, plant unanswered questions. Make pain concrete with numbers. Dig three levels past features to find the real benefit.
- Evidence: Every claim needs backup. Structure results as mini-stories: who they were, what they did, what changed, how long it took.
- CTAs: Name the reward, not the action. Below the button, reduce friction: remove risk, show peers, emphasise speed.
For landing/sales pages, use the full arc from the persuasion toolkit — hook through final CTA — adapting which sections to include based on format and audience awareness.
Step 6: Generate Variants
Read references/variants-and-scoring.md for the full protocol.
- Headlines: 5-10 variants across different frameworks. Lead with a QUICK PICK summary.
- Body copy (landing/sales pages): 2-3 variants — Control (strongest primary angle), Contrarian (counterintuitive entry), Proof-Led (evidence first).
- Email subject lines: 5-7 variants when writing emails.
Step 7: Score the Copy
Use the 7-dimension rubric from references/variants-and-scoring.md:
Clarity, Specificity, Voice, Desire, Proof, Urgency, Flow, each 1-10, total out of 70. Apply the thresholds table in references/variants-and-scoring.md.
Self-score generated copy honestly. If any dimension is below 7, note what would fix it and offer to revise.
When the user asks to "score this" or "review my copy" — score first, show weaknesses, then offer to rewrite.
Step 8: Humanizer Gate
Before saving, run all generated copy through tool-humanizer in pipeline mode. Use deep mode if brand_context/voice-profile.md was loaded, standard otherwise. Read tool-humanizer/SKILL.md and apply its pattern detection + replacement process. Only show the score summary if the delta exceeds 2 points.
Step 9: Save Output
Save to projects/mkt-copywriting/{campaign-name}/:
| Format | Filename |
| Landing page | {YYYY-MM-DD}_landing-page.md |
| Sales page | {YYYY-MM-DD}_sales-page.md |
{YYYY-MM-DD}_email_{subject-slug}.md | |
| Ad copy | {YYYY-MM-DD}_ad_{platform}_{variant}.md |
| Social post | {YYYY-MM-DD}_social_{platform}.md |
Include YAML frontmatter: type, campaign, awareness_level, variant, platform, word_count, date, score.
After saving, show the user actual copy excerpts — not just file paths.
Suggest A/B tests from references/variants-and-scoring.md § A/B Testing.
Step 10: Collect Feedback
Ask: "Does this sound like you? Which headline/variant direction resonates most?"
Log feedback to context/learnings.md → ## mkt-copywriting. If the user flags voice issues, note them so next run adapts.
Suggest logical next skills based on what was created (e.g., after landing page → email sequences, content repurposing).
Troubleshooting
- No brand context: Proceed standalone. Note what would make it better.
- No proof/testimonials available: Write placeholder sections marked
[ADD TESTIMONIAL]. Suggest the user gather 2-3 specific results. - User can't articulate the transformation: Run the So What? chain with them. Start with features, dig three levels.
- Copy sounds generic after generation: Check if ICP was loaded. If not, ask 2 questions about who they're writing for.
- Voice doesn't match: Re-read voice-profile.md and samples.md. Adjust sentence length, vocabulary, formality.
Rules
Updated automatically when the user flags issues. Read before every run.
- LinkedIn posts must NOT end with a question. Close with a strong declarative statement, a CTA, or a punchy fragment instead. This overrides any "end with a question" guidance in reference files. (2026-03-13)
Self-Update
If the user flags an issue with the output, add a dated entry under ## Rules in this skill's SKILL.local.md (create it if missing) and log it to context/learnings.md under ## mkt-copywriting. Write the general rule the correction implies, not the one-off fix.
Included AI-OS extension
Read references/ai-os-extension.md alongside this file. It contains the
shipped supplementary methodology and integration rules. User corrections
belong in a new SKILL.local.md; they take precedence over the shipped files.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

