agentleFS
cameroncookecameroncooke/XcodeBuildMCP/.agents/skills/mobilebuildmcp-docs-command-review/SKILL.md

mobilebuildmcp-docs-command-review

Skill6.5k starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when reviewing MobileBuildMCP changelog CLI command references for invalid current guidance while allowing historical migration examples.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Trending

Quiet since May.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 1 mentionJan 2026: 4 mentionsFeb 2026: 1 mentionMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 1 mentionJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the cameroncooke/XcodeBuildMCP repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about cameroncooke/XcodeBuildMCP

The biggest 5 of 21 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 21

Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (21 times).

On GitHub · 17

12 more on GitHub

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not report removed commands when they are clearly historical context, especially in:

    line 34
  2. Distinctive:

    If all command references are historical or valid, report no findings.

    line 60

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

MobileBuildMCP Docs Command Review

Review changed changelog entries for CLI command references that would mislead users or agents.

What to inspect

  • CHANGELOG.md
  • manifests/tools/*.yaml and manifests/workflows/*.yaml when you need to verify current CLI workflow/tool names
  • src/cli/** only when command wiring is unclear from manifests

Issue criteria

Report a finding only when a command reference is presented as current guidance and appears invalid for the current CLI surface.

High severity

  • A changelog bullet, example, or migration instruction tells users to run a removed or invalid mobilebuildmcp command as the current path.
  • A Breaking change mentions a removed command but does not give a valid replacement.
  • A command reference uses the wrong workflow/tool pairing in a way a user or agent would likely copy.

Medium severity

  • A command reference is ambiguous enough that users may not know whether it is historical or current.
  • A migration example gives the right replacement but does not clearly label the old command as "Before", "old", "removed", or equivalent.

Explicitly allowed

Do not report removed commands when they are clearly historical context, especially in:

  • Breaking-change migration sections
  • "Before" examples paired with valid "After" examples
  • Already-released changelog sections describing past behavior

Example that should not be reported:

Before:
mobilebuildmcp logging start-sim-log-cap

After:
mobilebuildmcp simulator build-and-run

Output

For each finding, include:

  • Severity
  • File and line
  • The command reference
  • Why it reads as current guidance
  • Suggested replacement wording or command

If all command references are historical or valid, report no findings.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.