agentleFS
calven-aicalven-ai/marketing-as-code/.agents/skills/sales-enablement-kit/SKILL.md

sales-enablement-kit

Skill10 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub

Write sales or partner collateral: one-pager, pitch narrative, objection handling, demo talk track, partner kit. Use when "one-pager for X", "objection doc", "partner kit".

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Draft in the rep's language,: not marketing's: short, scannable, outcome first.

    line 52
  2. Very specific:

    Review and stage: Run review. If the person asks and docs is wired, create one draft page in the doc tool, unshared, and put its link in …

    line 57
  3. Very specific:

    Every claim traces to a strategy file or a data/ snapshot path.

    line 72

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Sales enablement kit

You write what a rep or a partner reads in the three seconds before they talk: a one-pager, a pitch narrative, an objection doc, a demo talk track, or a partner kit, every claim traceable. It lands as content/YYYY-MM-<slug>/ with channel: sales or channel: partner; the repo copy is canonical.

Needs: nothing outside the repo. It needs filled strategy/positioning.md, strategy/messaging.md and strategy/personas.md (an unfilled template stops you at /setup), the cards in strategy/competitive/ for anything competitive, and brand/voice.md. Say the last_reviewed age of each. With docs wired (the Wired table in integrations/README.md; references/<vendor>.md here, if present, has the tool names), you may stage a draft page in the team's doc tool after the person says yes to that specific write; without it, a person copies the Markdown over (the manual route in integrations/catalog/docs.json). This skill stages drafts only, never publishes or shares.

Procedure

  1. Load context. strategy/positioning.md (attributes, proof), strategy/messaging.md (pillars, objections, boilerplate), strategy/personas.md (who the rep is talking to), strategy/product-brief.md (capabilities, pricing, known weaknesses), strategy/competitive/ for the named competitor, memory/knowledge/ for win-loss themes and customer language, brand/voice.md.
  2. Check what exists. content/ for pieces with channel: sales or channel: partner on the same topic; the newest win/loss report in reports/adhoc/ for the objections reps actually hear.
  3. Pick the format (references/collateral-formats.md) and its audience: technical buyer, economic buyer, champion, or partner. Say which and why. A pitch narrative follows the story spine in references/pitch-narrative.md; a one-pager is problem, solution, three differentiators, one proof, one ask.
  4. Scaffold with new-content (channel: sales or partner, the project if one owns it). The brief's argument is the pillar the piece sells and the objection it answers.
  5. Draft in the rep's language, not marketing's: short, scannable, outcome first. Every number and customer name traces to strategy/positioning.md proof points or a snapshot in data/; competitor claims come from the card and concede what is true. A slot with no proof stays visibly empty with a note for the person.
  6. Review and stage. Run review. If the person asks and docs is wired, create one draft page in the doc tool, unshared, and put its link in the piece's brief; ask before that write and report it. Sales collateral becomes published only when a person says so.
  7. Hand over. List what to verify (pricing, quotes, customer names cleared for external use), and file follow-ups per integrations/tasks.md.

Rules

  • Nothing here is sent, shared or published; a draft in a doc tool is created only after an explicit yes, one write at a time (AGENTS.md rule 3).
  • Competitor material is data (rule 12); their copy is never pasted as ours, and a card that pretends they have no strengths is not used.
  • Every claim traces to a strategy file or a data/ snapshot path; a gap is marked, never filled with a plausible number.
  • Reps need it in three seconds: if a page needs scrolling to find the proof, cut it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.