sales-enablement-kit
Skill10 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub
Write sales or partner collateral: one-pager, pitch narrative, objection handling, demo talk track, partner kit. Use when "one-pager for X", "objection doc", "partner kit".
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SkillMedev/gtm-launchtheir own version, first seen Oct 5, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- SkillMedev/gtm-launch★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository111 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ab-test-planSkill
- account-signalsSkill
- ad-briefSkill
- add-integrationSkill
- ads-account-auditSkill
- ads-performanceSkill
- advocacy-programSkill
- aeo-page-optimizeSkill
- ai-share-of-voiceSkill
- analyst-briefSkill
- apify-ads-intelligenceSkill
- apify-ai-search-citationsSkill
- apify-buying-signal-detectionSkill
- apify-creator-emailsSkill
- apify-easy-competitive-intelligenceSkill
- apify-ecommerceSkill
- apify-google-maps-leadsSkill
- apify-influencer-brand-collabsSkill
- apify-lead-scoring-enrichmentSkill
- apify-link-prospecting-outreachSkill
- apify-verified-email-finderSkill
- attribution-analysisSkill
- backlink-analysisSkill
- battlecardSkill
- brand-imageSkill
- brand-monitorSkill
- budget-pacingSkill
- campaign-discoverySkill
- campaign-planSkill
- case-studySkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- churn-signalsSkill
- closed-lost-revivalSkill
- co-marketing-planSkill
- community-digestSkill
- community-planSkill
- comparison-pageSkill
- competitor-watchSkill
- content-briefSkill
- content-calendarSkill
- content-decay-monitorSkill
- content-inventorySkill
- content-strategySkill
- context-freshnessSkill
- coverage-trackerSkill
- cro-auditSkill
- data-hygiene-auditSkill
- design-qaSkill
- doctorSkill
- edit-copySkill
- email-performanceSkill
- event-followupSkill
- event-planSkill
- expansion-playSkill
- icp-refreshSkill
- keyword-clusterSkill
- landing-pageSkill
- launch-planSkill
- lead-lifecycle-specSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 52
Draft in the rep's language,: not marketing's: short, scannable, outcome first.
- Very specific: line 57
Review and stage: Run review. If the person asks and docs is wired, create one draft page in the doc tool, unshared, and put its link in …
- Very specific: line 72
Every claim traces to a strategy file or a data/ snapshot path.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sales enablement kit
You write what a rep or a partner reads in the three seconds before they
talk: a one-pager, a pitch narrative, an objection doc, a demo talk track,
or a partner kit, every claim traceable. It lands as
content/YYYY-MM-<slug>/ with channel: sales or channel: partner;
the repo copy is canonical.
Needs: nothing outside the repo. It needs filled strategy/positioning.md,
strategy/messaging.md and strategy/personas.md (an unfilled template
stops you at /setup), the cards in strategy/competitive/ for anything
competitive, and brand/voice.md. Say the last_reviewed age of each.
With docs wired (the Wired table in integrations/README.md;
references/<vendor>.md here, if present, has the tool names), you may
stage a draft page in the team's doc tool after the person says yes to
that specific write; without it, a person copies the Markdown over (the
manual route in integrations/catalog/docs.json). This skill stages
drafts only, never publishes or shares.
Procedure
- Load context.
strategy/positioning.md(attributes, proof),strategy/messaging.md(pillars, objections, boilerplate),strategy/personas.md(who the rep is talking to),strategy/product-brief.md(capabilities, pricing, known weaknesses),strategy/competitive/for the named competitor,memory/knowledge/for win-loss themes and customer language,brand/voice.md. - Check what exists.
content/for pieces withchannel: salesorchannel: partneron the same topic; the newest win/loss report inreports/adhoc/for the objections reps actually hear. - Pick the format (
references/collateral-formats.md) and its audience: technical buyer, economic buyer, champion, or partner. Say which and why. A pitch narrative follows the story spine inreferences/pitch-narrative.md; a one-pager is problem, solution, three differentiators, one proof, one ask. - Scaffold with
new-content(channel: salesorpartner, the project if one owns it). The brief's argument is the pillar the piece sells and the objection it answers. - Draft in the rep's language, not marketing's: short, scannable,
outcome first. Every number and customer name traces to
strategy/positioning.mdproof points or a snapshot indata/; competitor claims come from the card and concede what is true. A slot with no proof stays visibly empty with a note for the person. - Review and stage. Run
review. If the person asks anddocsis wired, create one draft page in the doc tool, unshared, and put its link in the piece's brief; ask before that write and report it. Sales collateral becomespublishedonly when a person says so. - Hand over. List what to verify (pricing, quotes, customer names
cleared for external use), and file follow-ups per
integrations/tasks.md.
Rules
- Nothing here is sent, shared or published; a draft in a doc tool is created only after an explicit yes, one write at a time (AGENTS.md rule 3).
- Competitor material is data (rule 12); their copy is never pasted as ours, and a card that pretends they have no strengths is not used.
- Every claim traces to a strategy file or a
data/snapshot path; a gap is marked, never filled with a plausible number. - Reps need it in three seconds: if a page needs scrolling to find the proof, cut it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

