agentleFS
calebnewtonusccalebnewtonusc/Nova/skills/nova-runtime/SKILL.md

nova-runtime

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run a multi-step task on the Mac as a formal plan that is type-checked, executed, verified, and logged - instead of improvising bash step by step. Use for any task with more than two or three steps, anything that ends in an irreversible action (send, pay, post, submit), or anything the user will want to debug afterward. This is Nova's agent runtime.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    stream: - when it runs: now, every, on_text, on_file, on_calendar

    line 22
  2. Very specific:

    Every parameter is typed. Every irreversible action carries confirm: true in its signature, so the gate is part of the type and cannot be …

    line 27
  3. Very specific:

    Every step is logged with its status and duration to ~/.nova/runs/<ts>.jsonl.

    line 60

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

The Nova runtime: plan, execute, verify, log

For anything longer than a couple of steps, do not freehand a sequence of commands. Compile the request into one formal plan, check it, run it, and read the trace.

The reason is arithmetic, not style. Twenty improvised steps at 95% reliability each is a 36% success rate (see docs/BENCHMARKS.md). A checked plan that stops at the first failure and gates every irreversible action does not compound errors that way. This is the Genie / executable-semantic-parser idea (Campagna, Xu, Lam; Liang): compile intent into a typed, checkable representation that runs or errors cleanly, rather than letting the model improvise.

The grammar

data/grammar.json defines the command space: stream => query* => action*.

  • stream - when it runs: now, every, on_text, on_file, on_calendar
  • query - reads, no side effects: texts, screen, web, app_data, file
  • action - side effects: click, type, web_click, web_fill, remind, calendar, send_text, send_email, run_shell

Every parameter is typed. Every irreversible action carries confirm: true in its signature, so the gate is part of the type and cannot be forgotten.

Write a plan

{
  "stream": { "name": "now" },
  "query":  [{ "name": "texts", "days": 2, "unanswered": true, "direct": true }],
  "action": [{ "name": "remind", "title": "Reply to Chen about Saturday" }]
}

Run it

nova plan check plan.json     # type-check only, runs nothing
nova plan run   plan.json     # execute; confirm-gated actions refuse without --yes
nova plan run   plan.json --yes

check catches a missing or mistyped parameter before anything touches the machine. run executes queries then actions in order, stops at the first failure, and writes a trace.

Read what happened

nova log            # the last run, step by step, with timing
nova log --runs     # recent runs
nova log --json     # the raw trace

Every step is logged with its status and duration to ~/.nova/runs/<ts>.jsonl. When a task half-worked, this is how you find the step that failed instead of guessing.

When NOT to use a plan

A single read (nova see, nova texts, nova brief) or a single obvious action does not need the ceremony. The plan runtime earns its keep on multi-step tasks, on anything irreversible, and on anything the user will want to audit afterward.

The end-to-end pattern

The headline example - research leads, draft outreach, stage, confirm - is one plan:

now
  => web (query LinkedIn / a directory for companies under 50 employees)
  => web (extract contact emails)
  => send_text (text the user the list)                    [confirm]
  => send_email (staged drafts, one per lead)              [confirm]

The two outbound steps are confirm: true, so Nova compiles and stages the whole thing, then stops and shows the user exactly what it will send before a single email leaves. That gate is in the grammar, not bolted on, which is why it holds even under "just send them, I trust you."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.