speckit.taskstoissues
Skill438 starsChanged 53 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty). [!CAUTION] ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL [!CAUTION] UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cnoe-io/ai-platform-engineeringword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- wedabro/bro-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 18, 2026
- compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skillsedited, first seen Jan 26, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- cnoe-io/ai-platform-engineering★ 438100% same
Edited · 1
- compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skills★ 6873% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- wedabro/bro-skills★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/docker-compose-first-install.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/safe-git-worktree.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdcCursor rule
- docker-compose-first-installSkill
- local-integration-testingSkill
- release-docsSkill
- run-caipe-integration-testsSkill
- skillsSkill
- speckit.analyzeSkill
- speckit.checklistSkill
- speckit.clarifySkill
- speckit.constitutionSkill
- speckit.implementSkill
- speckit.planSkill
- speckit.specifySkill
- speckit.sync-templateSkill
- speckit.tasksSkill
- streaming-testingSkill
- ui-performance-benchmarkSkill
- update-docsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Run .specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts. --><!-- AUTO-GENERATED — DO NOT EDIT --><!-- Source: .specify/templates/commands/taskstoissues.md --><!-- Regenerate: make generate-agent-files -->description: Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts. tools: ['github/github-mcp-server/issue_write']
User Input
$ARGUMENTSYou MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Outline
- Run
.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasksfrom repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot"). - From the executed script, extract the path to tasks.
- Get the Git remote by running:
git config --get remote.origin.url[!CAUTION] ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
- For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote.
[!CAUTION] UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

