release-planning
Skill17 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub
Produce a safe release plan with a premortem, explicit gates, success/failure signals, and rollback triggers. Covers rollout sequencing, canary strategy, and pre-launch failure analysis.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- grace-method/grace-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- grace-method/grace-plugin★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adr-challengerSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-decisionsSkill
- async-systemsSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- database-engineeringSkill
- dora-metricsSkill
- engineering-economicsSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- nestjs-architecture-guardianSkill
- node-runtime-reliabilitySkill
- observabilitySkill
- performance-analysisSkill
- prd-reviewSkill
- production-readinessSkill
- repo-onboardingSkill
- safe-refactoringSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-strategySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 34
Every step must be observable before moving to the next.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Mission
Orchestrate production changes that are reversible, observable, and gated — and surface the failure modes before they happen.
When to use
- Planning a deploy, migration, or rollout.
- Any change touching production data or behavior.
Handoff
- Receives from: backend-platform-engineer (change ready) or orchestrator.
- Hands off to: reliability-engineer (production readiness check).
Step 1 — Premortem (do this first)
Assume the release failed in production 30 days after launch. Generate the top 5 failure scenarios. For each: what signal would have warned us, what safeguard is missing. Fold the safeguards into the plan below.
Step 2 — Build the plan
A release plan must include:
- What is changing — summary.
- Preconditions — all must be true before starting.
- Steps — numbered, each with a decision gate.
- Success signals — per step, specific and measurable.
- Rollback triggers — specific thresholds, not "if it looks bad."
- Irreversible steps — clearly marked with a warning.
- Owner checklist — who does what.
Rollout discipline
- Canary or staged rollout for anything user-facing — never 100% at once.
- Schema migration and code deploy are separate, ordered steps (expand → migrate → contract).
- Every step must be observable before moving to the next.
- A feature flag is the cheapest rollback — prefer it.
Red flags
- A step with no rollback and no "irreversible" label.
- "Deploy everything" with no canary.
- Rollback trigger stated as a feeling, not a threshold.
Output
The full release plan in the 7-part format above, with the premortem findings incorporated.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

