agentleFS
c-ibarrac-ibarra/ObsidianKnowledgeCurator/.agents/skills/knowledge-synthesis/SKILL.md

knowledge-synthesis

Skill0 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use this skill when the user wants to synthesize, summarize, or combine knowledge from multiple notes into a single coherent output. Triggers include "synthesize my notes on", "combine these notes", "create an overview of", "what do my notes say about", "synthesize my notes on", "combine these notes", "summary of everything I have on".

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read multiple related notes from the vault and produce a coherent synthesis that follows the vault's conventions (no YAML, blockquote …

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Read top 5–8 results. Confirm the source list with the user before proceeding.

    line 35
  3. Very specific:

    Use summary-generator to extract from each note:

    line 43
  4. Distinctive:

    Never invent claims not present in source notes

    line 112
  5. Distinctive:

    Always attribute insights to source notes with wikilinks

    line 115
  6. Very specific:

    No YAML, no emojis outside of ## 📌 Key Takeaways

    line 116

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Knowledge Synthesis Skill

Goal

Read multiple related notes from the vault and produce a coherent synthesis that follows the vault's conventions (no YAML, blockquote header, standard sections) — using summary-generator for processing and obsidian CLI for vault operations.

Prerequisites

pgrep -x Obsidian > /dev/null && echo "open" || echo "CLOSED"
# Read obsidian-cli skill before operating

⚠️ Never read or include content from: dataScienceKnowledgeBase/dswok

Step 1 — Gather source notes

Path A — user provides specific notes:

obsidian read file="<note 1>"
obsidian read file="<note 2>"

Path B — user provides a topic:

obsidian search query="<topic>" limit=10
obsidian search:context query="<topic>" limit=5
obsidian tag name="<related-tag>"

Read top 5–8 results. Confirm the source list with the user before proceeding.

Also check for existing backlinks that might add context:

obsidian backlinks file="<key note>" counts

Step 2 — Process with summary-generator

Use summary-generator to extract from each note:

  • Central claim (1 sentence)
  • Supporting evidence or examples
  • Open questions or tensions

Then identify cross-note patterns:

  • Agreements → high-confidence insights
  • Tensions → surface explicitly, don't pick sides
  • Progressions → sequence logically
  • Gaps → mark as open threads

Step 3 — Validate with superpowers

Before writing:

  • No hallucinated content
  • No YAML frontmatter
  • [[links]] in Related exist in the vault
  • File name follows the naming convention
  • Correct header blockquote

Step 4 — Write synthesis (vault conventions)

# Synthesis — <Topic>

> **Synthesis — <Topic>**
> Source: Multiple vault notes
> Date: Month Year
> Type: analysis
> Tags: #no-read-yet

## 📌 Key Takeaways
1. <most important insight>
2. ...
3. ...

## 1. <Main Topic>
<Paragraph synthesizing multiple notes, citing as [[Note A]], [[Note B]]>

## 2. <Tensions and Open Questions>
- [[Note A]] argues X, but [[Note C]] suggests Y — unresolved
- Why does Z happen? No note answers this yet

## Flashcards
Q: <key question>
A: <synthesized answer>

## Glossary
**Term**: Definition

## Related
- [[Note A]]
- [[Note B]]
- [[Note C]]

Step 5 — Save to vault

obsidian create path="<RootFolder>/<Category>/Synthesis — <Topic>.md" \
  content="<content>" silent

obsidian read file="Synthesis — <Topic>"   # verify

Optionally add backlink in source notes:

obsidian append file="<source note>" content="\n→ Synthesized in: [[Synthesis — <Topic>]]"

Constraints

  • Never invent claims not present in source notes
  • Surface tensions — never silently pick one side
  • Synthesis: 300–800 words; split if longer
  • Always attribute insights to source notes with wikilinks
  • No YAML, no emojis outside of ## 📌 Key Takeaways

Examples

"Synthesize my notes on MCP"

obsidian search query="MCP Model Context Protocol" limit=10
obsidian files folder="dataScienceKnowledgeBase/AI Engineer/MCP" total
# read → summary-generator → validate → write to Syntheses or MCP folder

"Combine my notes on LangGraph and LangChain"

obsidian search query="LangGraph" limit=5
obsidian search query="LangChain" limit=5
# compare → structure as comparison synthesis

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.