knowledge-synthesis
Skill0 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when the user wants to synthesize, summarize, or combine knowledge from multiple notes into a single coherent output. Triggers include "synthesize my notes on", "combine these notes", "create an overview of", "what do my notes say about", "synthesize my notes on", "combine these notes", "summary of everything I have on".
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- edu6565/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- tstapler/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Oct 10, 2026
- miptah21/skillstheir own version, first seen May 26, 2026
- fabioc-aloha/alex-cognitive-architecturetheir own version, first seen Apr 26, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- tstapler/dotfiles★ 8same name
- miptah21/skills★ 2same name
- edu6565/claude-skills★ 0same name
- fabioc-aloha/alex-cognitive-architecture★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository68 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ai-engineering-chip-huyenSkill
- ask-mattSkill
- book-to-skillSkill
- claude-handoffSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- daily-noteSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- getContextSizeSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- graphify-querySkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- knowledge-linkSkill
- loop-meSkill
- master-plan-builderSkill
- migrate-to-shoehornSkill
- note-captureSkill
- note-reviewSkill
- notion-curatorSkill
- obsidian-knowledge-curatorSkill
- okc-bookFlashcardsSkill
- okc-bookSummarySkill
- okc-diagnosticsAndSynchronizationSkill
- okc-docSkill
- okc-doctorSkill
- okc-driftSkill
- okc-emergeSkill
- okc-exploreSkill
- okc-findSkill
- okc-linterSkill
- okc-normalizeSkill
- okc-setupSkill
- okc-study-multichoiceSkill
- okc-studySkill
- okc-syncSkill
- okc-traceSkill
- okc-urlArticleSkill
- okc-urlPlaylistSkill
- okc-urlPodcastSkill
- okc-urlSpotifySkill
- okc-urlTwitterSkill
- okc-urlYoutubeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- scaffold-exercisesSkill
- setup-matt-pocock-skillsSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- setup-ts-deep-modulesSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Read multiple related notes from the vault and produce a coherent synthesis that follows the vault's conventions (no YAML, blockquote …
- Distinctive: line 35
Read top 5–8 results. Confirm the source list with the user before proceeding.
- Very specific: line 43
Use summary-generator to extract from each note:
- Distinctive: line 112
Never invent claims not present in source notes
- Distinctive: line 115
Always attribute insights to source notes with wikilinks
- Very specific: line 116
No YAML, no emojis outside of ## 📌 Key Takeaways
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Knowledge Synthesis Skill
Goal
Read multiple related notes from the vault and produce a coherent synthesis that follows
the vault's conventions (no YAML, blockquote header, standard sections) — using
summary-generator for processing and obsidian CLI for vault operations.
Prerequisites
pgrep -x Obsidian > /dev/null && echo "open" || echo "CLOSED"
# Read obsidian-cli skill before operating⚠️ Never read or include content from: dataScienceKnowledgeBase/dswok
Step 1 — Gather source notes
Path A — user provides specific notes:
obsidian read file="<note 1>"
obsidian read file="<note 2>"Path B — user provides a topic:
obsidian search query="<topic>" limit=10
obsidian search:context query="<topic>" limit=5
obsidian tag name="<related-tag>"Read top 5–8 results. Confirm the source list with the user before proceeding.
Also check for existing backlinks that might add context:
obsidian backlinks file="<key note>" countsStep 2 — Process with summary-generator
Use summary-generator to extract from each note:
- Central claim (1 sentence)
- Supporting evidence or examples
- Open questions or tensions
Then identify cross-note patterns:
- Agreements → high-confidence insights
- Tensions → surface explicitly, don't pick sides
- Progressions → sequence logically
- Gaps → mark as open threads
Step 3 — Validate with superpowers
Before writing:
- No hallucinated content
- No YAML frontmatter
[[links]]in Related exist in the vault- File name follows the naming convention
- Correct header blockquote
Step 4 — Write synthesis (vault conventions)
# Synthesis — <Topic>
> **Synthesis — <Topic>**
> Source: Multiple vault notes
> Date: Month Year
> Type: analysis
> Tags: #no-read-yet
## 📌 Key Takeaways
1. <most important insight>
2. ...
3. ...
## 1. <Main Topic>
<Paragraph synthesizing multiple notes, citing as [[Note A]], [[Note B]]>
## 2. <Tensions and Open Questions>
- [[Note A]] argues X, but [[Note C]] suggests Y — unresolved
- Why does Z happen? No note answers this yet
## Flashcards
Q: <key question>
A: <synthesized answer>
## Glossary
**Term**: Definition
## Related
- [[Note A]]
- [[Note B]]
- [[Note C]]Step 5 — Save to vault
obsidian create path="<RootFolder>/<Category>/Synthesis — <Topic>.md" \
content="<content>" silent
obsidian read file="Synthesis — <Topic>" # verifyOptionally add backlink in source notes:
obsidian append file="<source note>" content="\n→ Synthesized in: [[Synthesis — <Topic>]]"Constraints
- Never invent claims not present in source notes
- Surface tensions — never silently pick one side
- Synthesis: 300–800 words; split if longer
- Always attribute insights to source notes with wikilinks
- No YAML, no emojis outside of
## 📌 Key Takeaways
Examples
"Synthesize my notes on MCP"
obsidian search query="MCP Model Context Protocol" limit=10
obsidian files folder="dataScienceKnowledgeBase/AI Engineer/MCP" total
# read → summary-generator → validate → write to Syntheses or MCP folder"Combine my notes on LangGraph and LangChain"
obsidian search query="LangGraph" limit=5
obsidian search query="LangChain" limit=5
# compare → structure as comparison synthesisDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

