agentleFS
busyeugenebusyeugene/content-marketing-skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md

content-calendar

Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user wants to build a quarterly or monthly content calendar. Scrapes the user's own blog, profiles competitor topics, runs keyword gap analysis, and produces a prioritized list of articles to write with briefs pre-seeded.

  • Reads credentials

27 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use campaign-brief, x-writer and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • DanderlionJerSkill

    campaign-brief

    Generate comprehensive campaign brief from strategy notes and goals

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • stevenflanagan1Skill

    x-writer

    X/Twitter Content Specialist. Writes X-native posts — hooks, threads, and standalone tweets optimised for the platform. Strictly enforces the 280 character limit with a count on every post. Supports standalone tweets and X threads (1/ format). Reads brand-style.md and content-calendar.md. Optional X trend research via Tasty Content MCP. Output to outputs/x/.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • stevenflanagan1Skill

    linkedin-writer

    LinkedIn Content Specialist. Writes LinkedIn-native posts for SMB clients — first-person, professional-but-human, built for LinkedIn's format and algorithm. Not adapted captions: posts written from first principles for the platform. Reads brand-style.md and content-calendar.md. Flags posts that would benefit from a Blotato infographic. Output to outputs/linkedin/.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • akhilkannurSkill

    content-repurposer

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use AskUserQuestion for horizon and refreshes Y/N.

    line 33
  2. Distinctive:

    Call the Site Explorer → content gap tool: own domain vs competitors.

    line 56
  3. Distinctive:

    No editorial guidelines pillars: ask the user directly or derive pillars from the cluster analysis of their existing blog.

    line 176
  4. Distinctive:

    Must-write table has one row per planned slot in the horizon (no gaps).

    line 181
  5. Very specific:

    Every must-write entry has a matching stub file under briefs/.

    line 182
  6. Distinctive:

    If re-run a month later, diffing the raw files should show what moved from backlog to must-write and which refreshes were completed.

    line 184

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Content Calendar

Build a data-backed content calendar. Scrapes the user's own blog to understand current coverage, profiles competitor topics, pulls keyword gap data from Ahrefs, optionally layers in GSC/GA4 performance signals, then produces a prioritized list of articles to write over the next quarter.

Setup

Recommended:

  • Ahrefs MCP — the official remote MCP server at https://api.ahrefs.com/mcp/mcp. Connect via Claude Code's MCP settings (OAuth, paid Ahrefs plan required). Used here for keyword volume, difficulty, and content-gap data via Keywords Explorer and Site Explorer.
  • FIRECRAWL_API_KEY — crawl own blog and competitor sitemaps.

Optional:

  • GSC_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON + GSC_SITE_URL — declining pages to refresh, striking-distance queries to push.
  • GA4_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON + GA4_PROPERTY_ID — top-performing existing content to cluster around and repurpose.
  • SE_RANKING_API_KEY — alternative rankings data source.

Inputs

  1. Own blog URL — root or blog index.
  2. Competitor list — 3–10 domains (can reuse the list from a prior competitor-analysis run if present at competitors/<date>-raw.json).
  3. Calendar horizon — one month, quarter, or half year. Default quarter.
  4. Cadence — posts per week or month the user plans to publish.
  5. Focus areas — optional thematic pillars (e.g. "sales enablement, RevOps, onboarding"). Inherit from editorial-guidelines.md if the user has listed content pillars there.
  6. Include refreshes? — default Y. Reuse GSC declining-pages data if configured.

Use AskUserQuestion for horizon and refreshes Y/N.

Process

1. Inventory the user's own blog

Scrape the user's blog via the Firecrawl → Jina → Playwright chain:

  • Pull the sitemap if available; otherwise crawl the blog index.
  • For each post, extract: URL, title, H1, publish date, updated date, primary topic/entity cluster, rough word count.

Cluster existing posts into topics using entity overlap. Produce a map of {cluster: [posts]}.

2. Inventory the competitors

Reuse competitors/<latest>-raw.json if present. Otherwise crawl each competitor blog via the same chain and build the same cluster map.

Flag topics where:

  • Competitors have ≥3 posts and the user has 0 → white-space topic.
  • Competitors have ≥3 posts and the user has 1 → under-covered topic.
  • User has ≥3 posts, competitors have 0–1 → user-dominated topic (defend).

3. Keyword gap (Ahrefs MCP)

Call the Site Explorer → content gap tool: own domain vs competitors. Capture keywords all competitors rank for but the user doesn't. Enrich each with volume, KD, and parent topic via Keywords Explorer → overview.

Group keywords into topic clusters. Each cluster becomes a candidate article with:

  • Suggested primary keyword (highest-volume with KD in range)
  • 5–10 secondary keywords
  • Estimated traffic ceiling (sum of volumes × conservative CTR)

4. Performance signals (optional)

GSC:

  • Striking distance (pos 8–20): convert each into either a new post or an optimization of an existing one.
  • Declining queries: find the landing page, suggest a refresh.
  • Impressions but no clicks (high impressions, CTR <1%): meta/title rewrite candidates.

GA4:

  • Top 20 pages by engaged sessions in the last 90 days → suggest a cluster expansion around each.
  • Pages with high entrance but high exit rate → UX + internal-link fixes.

5. Score and prioritize

For each candidate article, compute a score:

score = (volume × relevance_to_pillars × brand_fit)
      / (kd × effort_estimate)
      × traffic_performance_multiplier

Where:

  • volume — Ahrefs monthly search volume
  • relevance_to_pillars — 0.5 if off-pillar, 1.0 on-pillar, 1.3 on-pillar + in white-space topic
  • brand_fit — 1.0 default, 0.7 if the topic doesn't match the brand's ICP
  • kd — Ahrefs difficulty, floored at 5
  • effort_estimate — 1 for comparison pages and listicles, 2 for deep how-to, 3 for original-research pieces
  • traffic_performance_multiplier — 1.2 if there's GSC striking-distance overlap, 1.0 otherwise

Rank candidates by score. Split into:

  • Must-write (top N to fill cadence)
  • Nice-to-write (next N)
  • Refresh queue (existing posts to update)

6. Sequence the calendar

Assign each must-write entry to a week based on:

  • Cadence (e.g. 2 posts/week)
  • Topic clustering (don't publish two posts from the same cluster in the same week)
  • Seasonality if the user flagged any
  • Any known product launches or events the user mentioned

7. Pre-seed briefs

For each must-write entry, create a lightweight seed in briefs/<slug>.stub.md with:

  • Primary keyword
  • Secondary keywords
  • Estimated volume and KD
  • Topic cluster
  • Suggested title
  • One-line angle

The user can later run the content-brief skill against each stub to expand it into a full brief.

8. Write the calendar file

Write to calendar/<horizon>-<YYYY-MM>.md:

# Content Calendar — {horizon}

_Generated: {YYYY-MM-DD}_
_Own blog: {url}_
_Competitors: {n}_
_Cadence: {posts}/week_
_Horizon: {start} → {end}_

## Summary

- **New articles planned:** {n}
- **Refreshes planned:** {n}
- **Estimated traffic ceiling:** {n}/month
- **Top topic clusters to win:** {list}

## Must-write

| Week | Date | Title | Primary kw | Volume | KD | Cluster | Score | Brief stub |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | 2026-04-15 | {title} | {kw} | 2,400 | 32 | {cluster} | 48 | `briefs/{slug}.stub.md` |

## Nice-to-write (backlog)

| Title | Primary kw | Volume | KD | Why it didn't make the cut |
|---|---|---|---|---|

## Refresh queue

| Existing URL | Declining query | Current pos | Potential | Recommended change |
|---|---|---|---|---|

## Cluster coverage map

| Cluster | Existing posts | Planned | Competitor posts | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|

## Notes

- White-space topics: {list}
- Threats (user-dominated topics where competitors are gaining): {list}
- Sources used: Ahrefs {Y/N}, Firecrawl {Y/N}, GSC {Y/N}, GA4 {Y/N}

Also save raw scoring data to calendar/<horizon>-<YYYY-MM>.raw.json.

9. Print summary

One block: N articles planned, N refreshes queued, top cluster, path to calendar, path to stubs directory.

Fallbacks

  • No Ahrefs MCP: skip keyword scoring; rank candidates by (relevance × competitor_coverage_count). Clearly mark the calendar as "content-only prioritization" in the header.
  • No GSC / GA4: skip performance signals; rely entirely on gap analysis. The traffic multiplier becomes 1.0 for everything.
  • Competitor blog scrapes time out: work with partial competitor coverage; list which competitors were skipped.
  • No editorial guidelines pillars: ask the user directly or derive pillars from the cluster analysis of their existing blog.

Verification

  1. Calendar file exists.
  2. Must-write table has one row per planned slot in the horizon (no gaps).
  3. Every must-write entry has a matching stub file under briefs/.
  4. Raw JSON file present.
  5. If re-run a month later, diffing the raw files should show what moved from backlog to must-write and which refreshes were completed.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.