content-calendar
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to build a quarterly or monthly content calendar. Scrapes the user's own blog, profiles competitor topics, runs keyword gap analysis, and produces a prioritized list of articles to write with briefs pre-seeded.
- Reads credentials
27 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- oivanfelipe/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- clements23/marketing-agency-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- saypage-ai/saypage-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- epicx-labs/keytomic-claude-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- try-era/geo-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- postoncehq/postonce-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use campaign-brief, x-writer and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
DanderlionJerSkillcampaign-brief
Generate comprehensive campaign brief from strategy notes and goals
Also in 3 projects that use this
stevenflanagan1Skillx-writer
X/Twitter Content Specialist. Writes X-native posts — hooks, threads, and standalone tweets optimised for the platform. Strictly enforces the 280 character limit with a count on every post. Supports standalone tweets and X threads (1/ format). Reads brand-style.md and content-calendar.md. Optional X trend research via Tasty Content MCP. Output to outputs/x/.
Also in 3 projects that use this
stevenflanagan1Skilllinkedin-writer
LinkedIn Content Specialist. Writes LinkedIn-native posts for SMB clients — first-person, professional-but-human, built for LinkedIn's format and algorithm. Not adapted captions: posts written from first principles for the platform. Reads brand-style.md and content-calendar.md. Flags posts that would benefit from a Blotato infographic. Output to outputs/linkedin/.
Also in 3 projects that use this
akhilkannurSkillcontent-repurposer
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions27 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 27
- indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro★ 934same name
- OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills★ 731same name
- vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skills★ 455same name
- Ootto-AI/claude-content-skills★ 417same name
- stevenflanagan1/social-ai-team★ 216same name
- marcosmodly/marketing-skill★ 100same name
- gokulsvision/Crewm8-Social-Media-Manager-Skill-Graph★ 17same name
- oswarld/notion-skills★ 11same name
- calven-ai/marketing-as-code★ 10same name
- styfinity/claude-marketing-department★ 6same name
17 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- blog-postSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- content-briefSkill
- content-marketingSkill
- editorial-guidelinesSkill
- email-copySkill
- landing-page-copySkill
- proofreading-style-checkSkill
- publish-webflowSkill
- publish-wordpressSkill
- repurpose-linkedin-carouselSkill
- repurpose-threads-xSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- social-postSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 33
Use AskUserQuestion for horizon and refreshes Y/N.
- Distinctive: line 56
Call the Site Explorer → content gap tool: own domain vs competitors.
- Distinctive: line 176
No editorial guidelines pillars: ask the user directly or derive pillars from the cluster analysis of their existing blog.
- Distinctive: line 181
Must-write table has one row per planned slot in the horizon (no gaps).
- Very specific: line 182
Every must-write entry has a matching stub file under briefs/.
- Distinctive: line 184
If re-run a month later, diffing the raw files should show what moved from backlog to must-write and which refreshes were completed.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Content Calendar
Build a data-backed content calendar. Scrapes the user's own blog to understand current coverage, profiles competitor topics, pulls keyword gap data from Ahrefs, optionally layers in GSC/GA4 performance signals, then produces a prioritized list of articles to write over the next quarter.
Setup
Recommended:
- Ahrefs MCP — the official remote MCP server at
https://api.ahrefs.com/mcp/mcp. Connect via Claude Code's MCP settings (OAuth, paid Ahrefs plan required). Used here for keyword volume, difficulty, and content-gap data via Keywords Explorer and Site Explorer. FIRECRAWL_API_KEY— crawl own blog and competitor sitemaps.
Optional:
GSC_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON+GSC_SITE_URL— declining pages to refresh, striking-distance queries to push.GA4_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON+GA4_PROPERTY_ID— top-performing existing content to cluster around and repurpose.SE_RANKING_API_KEY— alternative rankings data source.
Inputs
- Own blog URL — root or blog index.
- Competitor list — 3–10 domains (can reuse the list from a prior
competitor-analysisrun if present atcompetitors/<date>-raw.json). - Calendar horizon — one month, quarter, or half year. Default quarter.
- Cadence — posts per week or month the user plans to publish.
- Focus areas — optional thematic pillars (e.g. "sales enablement, RevOps, onboarding"). Inherit from
editorial-guidelines.mdif the user has listed content pillars there. - Include refreshes? — default Y. Reuse GSC declining-pages data if configured.
Use AskUserQuestion for horizon and refreshes Y/N.
Process
1. Inventory the user's own blog
Scrape the user's blog via the Firecrawl → Jina → Playwright chain:
- Pull the sitemap if available; otherwise crawl the blog index.
- For each post, extract: URL, title, H1, publish date, updated date, primary topic/entity cluster, rough word count.
Cluster existing posts into topics using entity overlap. Produce a map of {cluster: [posts]}.
2. Inventory the competitors
Reuse competitors/<latest>-raw.json if present. Otherwise crawl each competitor blog via the same chain and build the same cluster map.
Flag topics where:
- Competitors have ≥3 posts and the user has 0 → white-space topic.
- Competitors have ≥3 posts and the user has 1 → under-covered topic.
- User has ≥3 posts, competitors have 0–1 → user-dominated topic (defend).
3. Keyword gap (Ahrefs MCP)
Call the Site Explorer → content gap tool: own domain vs competitors. Capture keywords all competitors rank for but the user doesn't. Enrich each with volume, KD, and parent topic via Keywords Explorer → overview.
Group keywords into topic clusters. Each cluster becomes a candidate article with:
- Suggested primary keyword (highest-volume with KD in range)
- 5–10 secondary keywords
- Estimated traffic ceiling (sum of volumes × conservative CTR)
4. Performance signals (optional)
GSC:
- Striking distance (pos 8–20): convert each into either a new post or an optimization of an existing one.
- Declining queries: find the landing page, suggest a refresh.
- Impressions but no clicks (high impressions, CTR <1%): meta/title rewrite candidates.
GA4:
- Top 20 pages by engaged sessions in the last 90 days → suggest a cluster expansion around each.
- Pages with high entrance but high exit rate → UX + internal-link fixes.
5. Score and prioritize
For each candidate article, compute a score:
score = (volume × relevance_to_pillars × brand_fit)
/ (kd × effort_estimate)
× traffic_performance_multiplierWhere:
volume— Ahrefs monthly search volumerelevance_to_pillars— 0.5 if off-pillar, 1.0 on-pillar, 1.3 on-pillar + in white-space topicbrand_fit— 1.0 default, 0.7 if the topic doesn't match the brand's ICPkd— Ahrefs difficulty, floored at 5effort_estimate— 1 for comparison pages and listicles, 2 for deep how-to, 3 for original-research piecestraffic_performance_multiplier— 1.2 if there's GSC striking-distance overlap, 1.0 otherwise
Rank candidates by score. Split into:
- Must-write (top N to fill cadence)
- Nice-to-write (next N)
- Refresh queue (existing posts to update)
6. Sequence the calendar
Assign each must-write entry to a week based on:
- Cadence (e.g. 2 posts/week)
- Topic clustering (don't publish two posts from the same cluster in the same week)
- Seasonality if the user flagged any
- Any known product launches or events the user mentioned
7. Pre-seed briefs
For each must-write entry, create a lightweight seed in briefs/<slug>.stub.md with:
- Primary keyword
- Secondary keywords
- Estimated volume and KD
- Topic cluster
- Suggested title
- One-line angle
The user can later run the content-brief skill against each stub to expand it into a full brief.
8. Write the calendar file
Write to calendar/<horizon>-<YYYY-MM>.md:
# Content Calendar — {horizon}
_Generated: {YYYY-MM-DD}_
_Own blog: {url}_
_Competitors: {n}_
_Cadence: {posts}/week_
_Horizon: {start} → {end}_
## Summary
- **New articles planned:** {n}
- **Refreshes planned:** {n}
- **Estimated traffic ceiling:** {n}/month
- **Top topic clusters to win:** {list}
## Must-write
| Week | Date | Title | Primary kw | Volume | KD | Cluster | Score | Brief stub |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | 2026-04-15 | {title} | {kw} | 2,400 | 32 | {cluster} | 48 | `briefs/{slug}.stub.md` |
## Nice-to-write (backlog)
| Title | Primary kw | Volume | KD | Why it didn't make the cut |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## Refresh queue
| Existing URL | Declining query | Current pos | Potential | Recommended change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## Cluster coverage map
| Cluster | Existing posts | Planned | Competitor posts | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## Notes
- White-space topics: {list}
- Threats (user-dominated topics where competitors are gaining): {list}
- Sources used: Ahrefs {Y/N}, Firecrawl {Y/N}, GSC {Y/N}, GA4 {Y/N}Also save raw scoring data to calendar/<horizon>-<YYYY-MM>.raw.json.
9. Print summary
One block: N articles planned, N refreshes queued, top cluster, path to calendar, path to stubs directory.
Fallbacks
- No Ahrefs MCP: skip keyword scoring; rank candidates by (relevance × competitor_coverage_count). Clearly mark the calendar as "content-only prioritization" in the header.
- No GSC / GA4: skip performance signals; rely entirely on gap analysis. The traffic multiplier becomes 1.0 for everything.
- Competitor blog scrapes time out: work with partial competitor coverage; list which competitors were skipped.
- No editorial guidelines pillars: ask the user directly or derive pillars from the cluster analysis of their existing blog.
Verification
- Calendar file exists.
- Must-write table has one row per planned slot in the horizon (no gaps).
- Every must-write entry has a matching stub file under
briefs/. - Raw JSON file present.
- If re-run a month later, diffing the raw files should show what moved from backlog to must-write and which refreshes were completed.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

