agentleFS
Sign inStart free
buildomatorbuildomator/buildomator/skills/mvp-phase/SKILL.md

mvp-phase

Skill102 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub

Plan an MVP-mode phase — captures an "As a / I want to / So that" user story, runs SPIDR splitting, then delegates to plan-phase

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion.

    line 31
  2. Very specific:

    When MVP planning concludes (user story written, ROADMAP.md updated, plan-phase delegated), emit a Next Up continuation block following the …

    line 50
  3. Very specific:

    Use /clear then: before the command

    line 54

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<objective> Guide the user through MVP-mode planning for a phase. Prompts for an "As a / I want to / So that" user story, runs SPIDR splitting check on the story, writes the result to ROADMAP.md, and delegates to `/gsd:plan-phase` (which auto-detects MVP via the roadmap mode field).

Orchestrator role: Parse phase argument, validate phase, gather user story, run SPIDR check, persist mode + story to ROADMAP.md, then route to plan-phase. </objective>

<execution_context> @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/mvp-phase.md @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/user-story-template.md @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/spidr-splitting.md @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/planner-mvp-mode.md </execution_context>

<runtime_note> Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion. They are equivalent — vscode_askquestions is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API.

TEXT_MODE fallback: Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. </runtime_note>

<context> Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required — integer or decimal like `2.1`)

Flags:

  • --force — Allow operating on in_progress / completed phases
  • --text — Use plain-text numbered lists instead of TUI menus</context>
<process> Execute the mvp-phase workflow from @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/mvp-phase.md end-to-end. Preserve all workflow gates (phase validation, user-story prompt, SPIDR check, ROADMAP.md persistence, delegation to plan-phase). </process>

<output_format> When MVP planning concludes (user story written, ROADMAP.md updated, plan-phase delegated), emit a Next Up continuation block following the pattern in references/continuation-format.md:

  • Show MVP-planning status (e.g., ## ✓ Phase N MVP-Planned — vertical slice captured)
  • Emit a ## ▶ Next Up heading with /gsd:execute-phase N (TDD execution)
  • Use `/clear` then: before the command
  • Include a parenthetical: (/clear is safe — /gsd:resume-work restores position from HANDOFF.json if you change your mind)

MVP planning is a deliberate slice-of-the-cake exercise; clearing context before execution keeps TDD focused on the captured story rather than the planning conversation. </output_format>

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free