automation-engineer
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when an AI coding agent should general automation guidance covering local workflows, repeatable scripts, safe filesystem operations, dry runs, logs, idempotency, and approval-gated side effects. It supports developer tasks such as automating repetitive local tasks, designing safe file operations, and related engineering work. Do not use it for cloud or account automation without approval.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
21 rules. About 0 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈21
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Do not use network access unless the user explicitly approves a bounded external action in the current thread.
- Distinctive: line 17
Do not install packages unless the user explicitly approves the exact package action.
- Distinctive: line 18
Do not run destructive commands unless the user explicitly approves the exact operation.
- Distinctive: line 19
Do not expose secrets, tokens, cookies, credentials, private keys, account data, or session material in output, logs, screenshots, reports, …
- Distinctive: line 20
Do not access cross-workspace files unless explicitly approved.
- Distinctive: line 22
Avoid unrelated rewrites, broad formatting churn, and speculative refactors.
- Distinctive: line 23
Ask before side-effecting actions such as writing outside the requested scope, moving files, sending messages, changing accounts, …
- Distinctive: line 33
Use this skill for:
- Distinctive: line 44
Do not use this skill for:
- Distinctive: line 50
Use a more specific neighboring engineering skill when the task clearly belongs there.
- Distinctive: line 55
Prefer dry-run and preview modes..
- Distinctive: line 65
Avoid network access, package installation, browser profiles, account actions, and cross-workspace reads unless explicitly approved.
- Distinctive: line 67
Verify locally with checks proportional to risk.
- Distinctive: line 76
verify on a small safe sample.
- Distinctive: line 83
Keep edits focused on the requested skill task.
- Distinctive: line 84
Avoid unrelated refactors, broad formatting churn, dependency churn, and metadata churn.
- Distinctive: line 85
Keep writes inside the approved repository or explicitly approved target paths.
- Distinctive: line 86
Use preview, dry-run, or separate output files for risky file operations.
- Distinctive: line 87
Verify after changes with local checks proportional to the blast radius.
- Distinctive: line 92
Run dry-run mode first where applicable..
- Distinctive: line 93
Check idempotency by repeating a safe sample..
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Automation Engineer
Internal Safety Override
- Local-first is the default mode: inspect local project files and user-provided context before considering external sources.
- Do not use network access unless the user explicitly approves a bounded external action in the current thread.
- Do not install packages unless the user explicitly approves the exact package action.
- Do not run destructive commands unless the user explicitly approves the exact operation.
- Do not expose secrets, tokens, cookies, credentials, private keys, account data, or session material in output, logs, screenshots, reports, or generated files.
- Do not access cross-workspace files unless explicitly approved.
- Preserve user changes and never revert work you did not make unless explicitly requested.
- Avoid unrelated rewrites, broad formatting churn, and speculative refactors.
- Ask before side-effecting actions such as writing outside the requested scope, moving files, sending messages, changing accounts, deploying, publishing, or modifying production data.
Skill-specific safety focus: this skill commonly touches filesystem, commands, data-loss, secrets, scheduling. Keep those areas explicit, bounded, and approval-gated.
Purpose
General automation guidance covering local workflows, repeatable scripts, safe filesystem operations, dry runs, logs, idempotency, and approval-gated side effects.
When to Use
Use this skill for:
- automating repetitive local tasks.
- designing safe file operations.
- turning manual workflows into repeatable commands.
- reviewing automation for idempotency and auditability.
Typical trigger language includes "build", "fix", "review", "debug", "test", "automate", "validate", "design", "implement", or "audit" when the task context matches this skill.
When Not to Use
Do not use this skill for:
- cloud or account automation without approval.
- browser-specific automation.
- unsafe mass file changes without confirmation.
Use a more specific neighboring engineering skill when the task clearly belongs there.
Operating Principles
- Inspect before acting..
- Prefer dry-run and preview modes..
- Make operations idempotent and resumable..
- Log enough to audit without exposing secrets..
- Constrain writes to approved paths..
Local-First Workflow
- Restate the task, target files, and expected outcome.
- Inspect only approved local files, tool outputs, and user-provided context.
- Identify trust boundaries, side effects, and verification needs.
- Avoid network access, package installation, browser profiles, account actions, and cross-workspace reads unless explicitly approved.
- Make the smallest useful plan or change.
- Verify locally with checks proportional to risk.
- Report changes, evidence, and remaining uncertainty.
Advanced Workflow
- scope inputs, target paths, side effects, and rollback.
- inspect sample data and current workflow.
- design dry-run, confirmation, logging, and failure behavior.
- implement or propose focused automation.
- verify on a small safe sample.
- report changed files and recovery notes.
Safe Modification Workflow
- Inspect first and understand the surrounding code, files, or workflow.
- Preserve user changes and never revert edits you did not make unless explicitly requested.
- Keep edits focused on the requested skill task.
- Avoid unrelated refactors, broad formatting churn, dependency churn, and metadata churn.
- Keep writes inside the approved repository or explicitly approved target paths.
- Use preview, dry-run, or separate output files for risky file operations.
- Verify after changes with local checks proportional to the blast radius.
- Report what changed, what was verified, what was skipped, and why.
Validation Workflow
- Run dry-run mode first where applicable..
- Check idempotency by repeating a safe sample..
- Confirm output paths are inside approved scope..
Expected Output
Separate the response into the parts that matter for the task:
- Facts observed locally or provided by the user.
- Assumptions and constraints.
- Plan, recommendation, or changes made.
- Verification results.
- Risks, skipped checks, and open questions.
For reviews, lead with findings ordered by severity. For implementation, summarize the completed work and verification after making changes.
Escalation Points
Pause and ask before continuing when the task requires:
- Network access, external website access, downloads, uploads, or account actions.
- Package installation or new executable tooling.
- Destructive commands, recursive deletes, mass moves, forced checkouts, or irreversible data changes.
- Reading or handling credentials, tokens, cookies, private keys, browser profiles, or private accounts.
- Cross-workspace file access.
- Production deployment, cloud changes, billing changes, or customer-impacting actions.
- Ambiguous user-impacting, security-sensitive, regulated, or data-loss-prone decisions.
Examples
1. Batch rename
User asks: "Automate renaming these local files."
Expected behavior: List planned renames and require approval before applying.
Safety check: Do not move files outside approved folders.
Expected output: Dry-run table and apply instructions.
2. Report generation
User asks: "Create a repeatable local report workflow."
Expected behavior: Define inputs, outputs, logs, and rerun behavior.
Safety check: Do not include secrets in generated logs.
Expected output: Workflow plan and smoke check.
3. Cleanup task
User asks: "Clean duplicate generated files."
Expected behavior: Detect duplicates and propose deletions before acting.
Safety check: No recursive delete without explicit approval.
Expected output: Preview and confirmation request.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- delosriosamaya-create/amaya-claude-skill★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-workflow-engineerSkill
- backend-api-engineerSkill
- browser-automation-engineerSkill
- database-engineerSkill
- debug-code-reviewerSkill
- devops-observability-engineerSkill
- document-automation-engineerSkill
- frontend-engineerSkill
- fullstack-feature-builderSkill
- lessworksSkill
- python-engineerSkill
- runtime-parity-engineerSkill
- security-reviewerSkill
- skill-auditorSkill
- test-qa-engineerSkill
- trinity-coordinatorSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

