vol-trading
Skill16 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
name: vol-trading description: Volatility trading — straddles, variance swaps, dispersion, VIX. origin: ECT Variance swaps provide pure exposure to realized variance without delta or gamma management.
In this repository83 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- live-trading-monitoringSkill
- monte-carlo-simulationSkill
- overfitting-preventionSkill
- research-notebooksSkill
- strategy-evaluationSkill
- walk-forward-optimizationSkill
- cross-chain-arbitrageSkill
- crypto-derivativesSkill
- defi-protocolsSkill
- mev-strategiesSkill
- on-chain-analyticsSkill
- stablecoin-analysisSkill
- tokenomicsSkill
- yield-farmingSkill
- alternative-dataSkill
- data-qualitySkill
- data-vendorsSkill
- feature-engineeringSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- web-scraping-financeSkill
- binomial-treesSkill
- black-scholesSkill
- credit-derivativesSkill
- exotic-optionsSkill
- hedging-strategiesSkill
- interest-rate-derivativesSkill
- monte-carlo-pricingSkill
- structured-productsSkill
- vol-surfacesSkill
- execution-algosSkill
- latency-optimizationSkill
- market-microstructure-theorySkill
- order-flow-analysisSkill
- performance-metricsSkill
- smart-order-routingSkill
- tick-data-processingSkill
- transaction-cost-analysisSkill
- central-bank-analysisSkill
- commodities-fundamentalsSkill
- economic-indicatorsSkill
- fx-fundamentalsSkill
- geopolitical-riskSkill
- yield-curve-analysisSkill
- alternative-allocationsSkill
- benchmark-trackingSkill
- black-littermanSkill
- factor-investingSkill
- markowitz-optimizationSkill
- portfolio-attributionSkill
- rebalancing-strategiesSkill
- risk-paritySkill
- alpha-researchSkill
- bayesian-methodsSkill
- deep-learning-tradingSkill
- factor-modelsSkill
- kalman-filtersSkill
- ml-for-financeSkill
- regime-detectionSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 247
Before deploying a volatility trading strategy:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Volatility Trading
name: vol-trading description: Volatility trading — straddles, variance swaps, dispersion, VIX. origin: ECT
When to Activate
- User wants to trade volatility as an asset class
- Analyzing realized vs implied volatility and the vol risk premium
- Pricing or trading variance swaps and vol swaps
- Designing dispersion trades (index vol vs single-stock vol)
- Trading VIX futures, options, or VIX-related products
- Building systematic vol selling strategies with tail protection
First Questions
- Are you trading vol directionally (long/short vol) or relative value (term structure, skew)?
- What is the underlying (single stock, equity index, FX, rates)?
- What is the target holding period (intraday, days, weeks, months)?
- What is the risk tolerance for tail events (vol strategies have extreme tails)?
- Is this a systematic or discretionary vol strategy?
Core Concepts
Realized vs Implied Volatility
Realized volatility (RV):
Historical volatility measured from past returns
Close-to-close: sigma = sqrt(252 * (1/N) * sum((r_t - r_bar)^2))
High-low (Parkinson): more efficient estimator using intraday range
Yang-Zhang: combines open-close and high-low for drift-independent estimate
Implied volatility (IV):
Market's expectation of future vol, extracted from option prices
Model-dependent: typically Black-Scholes implied vol
Represents the vol that equates model price to market price
Key relationships:
IV - RV = Volatility Risk Premium (VRP)
VRP is positive on average: options are systematically "expensive"
SPX VRP: ~3-5 vol points (IV ~18%, RV ~15% long-term average)
VRP compensates for: jump risk, volatility-of-volatility risk, crash risk
Measuring the VRP:
VRP_realized = IV(t-30) - RV(t-30, t) (ex-post)
VRP is positive ~80% of months for SPX
VRP is largest for short-dated options (front month)
VRP shrinks during sustained low-vol regimes (2017) and inverts in crises (2008, 2020)Variance Swaps
Variance swaps provide pure exposure to realized variance without delta or gamma management.
Mechanics:
At expiry, payoff = Notional_variance * (Realized_Variance - Strike_Variance)
Notional_variance = Vega_notional / (2 * K_vol)
Where K_vol = strike in volatility terms
Fair strike (K_var):
K_var = (2/T) * integral[exp(rT) * (OTM_put_price/K^2 + OTM_call_price/K^2) dK]
This is the VIX^2 formula: var swap strike = risk-neutral expected variance
Requires a continuum of OTM option prices (in practice, interpolated)
Variance swap vs vol swap:
Variance swap: payoff linear in variance (sigma^2)
Vol swap: payoff linear in volatility (sigma) — harder to replicate
Convexity adjustment: K_vol_swap < K_var_swap (Jensen's inequality)
Var swap always has higher strike than vol swap
P&L example:
Strike: 20% vol (400 variance points)
Realized vol: 25% (625 variance points)
Vega notional: $100,000
Variance notional: $100,000 / (2 * 20) = $2,500 per variance point
P&L = $2,500 * (625 - 400) = $562,500
Key features:
- No delta hedging required (pure vol exposure)
- Mark-to-market: sensitive to both remaining implied vol and realized vol to date
- Convexity: variance swap has convex payoff in vol (benefits from vol spikes)
- Tail risk: unlimited downside for short variance (realized vol can spike to 80%+)VIX Futures and Options
VIX Index:
VIX = sqrt((2/T) * sum(delta_K/K_i^2 * e^(rT) * Q(K_i)) * 100^2)
Where Q(K_i) = OTM option prices on SPX
VIX measures 30-day expected variance of SPX (annualized, in vol terms)
VIX is NOT directly tradeable (it's a calculation, not a security)
VIX Futures:
VIX futures converge to VIX at expiration
Term structure: usually in contango (longer-dated > shorter-dated)
Normal contango: ~5% per month (VIX = 15, 2nd month = 16.5)
Backwardation: during vol spikes (VIX = 35, 2nd month = 30)
Roll yield:
In contango: long VIX futures bleeds ~5% per month (negative roll yield)
In backwardation: long VIX futures gains from roll (positive roll yield)
This is why long VIX ETPs (VXX, UVXY) lose ~60-80% annually in calm markets
VIX Options:
Options on VIX futures (not VIX spot)
VIX calls: often used as tail hedges (portfolio insurance)
VIX puts: sell to harvest VRP (risky if vol spikes)
VIX options have their own vol surface (vol-of-vol)
VIX call skew is extremely steep (upside calls are very expensive)
Trading the VIX term structure:
Calendar spread: long front month, short back month (or reverse)
Thesis: term structure will flatten (long front) or steepen (short front)
Carry: depends on contango/backwardation slope
Risk: front-month VIX is extremely volatile (can move 30-50% in a day)Dispersion Trading
Dispersion trades exploit the difference between index implied vol and the implied vols of index constituents.
Concept:
Index variance = weighted average stock variance + covariance terms
sigma_index^2 = sum(w_i^2 * sigma_i^2) + sum_i_neq_j(w_i * w_j * sigma_i * sigma_j * rho_ij)
If implied correlation is "too high":
Sell index straddles (or variance swaps)
Buy single-stock straddles (or variance swaps)
Profit = index vol sold - vega-weighted stock vol bought
Why index vol is usually "rich":
- Index options are in high demand (portfolio hedging)
- This bids up index implied vol relative to constituent vols
- Implied correlation > realized correlation most of the time
Dispersion trade P&L:
P&L = (implied_correlation - realized_correlation) * correlation_vega
Positive most of the time (implied corr > realized corr)
Negative in crises (correlations spike to 0.7-0.9, dispersion loses)
Implementation:
Sell index variance swap, buy variance swaps on top 20-50 constituents
Vega-weight to be correlation-neutral at entry
Or: sell index straddle, buy constituent straddles (delta-hedge all)
Risk: correlation spike (2008: realized corr hit 0.8, dispersion lost heavily)
Typical P&L profile:
Win rate: ~70-75% of months
Average win: 0.3-0.5% of notional
Average loss: 1-3% of notional
Sharpe: 0.4-0.8 (before tail events)
Max loss: 5-15% of notional in crisis (must size accordingly)Systematic Vol Selling with Tail Protection
Core strategy: harvest the volatility risk premium systematically
Naked vol selling (no protection):
Sell 30-day SPX straddles or strangles, delta-hedge
Expected return: VRP * exposure (~3-5% annualized for modest sizing)
Risk: unlimited in theory, -30% to -50% in practice (2008, 2018 Volmageddon)
Sharpe: 0.5-0.8 but extreme negative skew (-3 to -5)
Vol selling with tail protection approaches:
1. OTM put purchase (put spread collar):
Sell ATM straddle, buy 10-15% OTM puts
Cost of protection: 1-2% of notional per month
Reduces VRP harvest by 30-50% but caps max loss
Net Sharpe: 0.3-0.5 with much better skew
2. VIX call hedge:
Sell SPX puts (short vol), buy VIX calls (tail hedge)
VIX calls are expensive, but convexity is high
Use 20-30 delta VIX calls, 2-3 months out
Hedge ratio: spend 10-20% of premium received on VIX calls
3. Managed vol selling (conditional):
Sell vol only when VRP is above threshold (e.g., IV - RV > 3 vol points)
Reduce or exit when VIX term structure inverts (backwardation = stress signal)
Stop loss: exit all short vol if portfolio down > X% in a month
Improves Sharpe to 0.6-1.0 vs unconditional selling
4. Variance swap with cap:
Sell capped variance swap (max payout capped at 2.5x strike)
Standard exchange-traded product (listed on some exchanges)
Cap limits tail risk explicitly
Strike is slightly lower than uncapped (compensation for cap)
5. Risk reversal overlay:
Sell OTM puts (vol selling), buy further OTM puts (tail protection)
Net: put spread, not naked short
Collect ~60-70% of naked put premium with bounded riskDetailed Methodology
Vol Surface Relative Value
Skew trades:
Risk reversal: sell 25-delta call, buy 25-delta put (or reverse)
Butterfly: buy 25-delta call + buy 25-delta put, sell 2x ATM
Thesis: skew is too steep or too flat relative to fair value
Term structure trades:
Calendar spread: sell front vol, buy back vol (or reverse)
Thesis: term structure shape will change
Carry: front vol decays faster (higher theta per unit vega)
Metrics:
Skew richness: current 25d skew vs historical percentile
Term structure slope: 3M - 1M implied vol vs historical
Vol-of-vol: VVIX level relative to VIX (regime indicator)Sizing Vol Positions
Key principle: size for the tail, not the average
Variance swap notional:
Max loss scenario: realized vol = 80% (crisis), strike = 20%
P&L = vega_notional / (2 * 20) * (6400 - 400) = vega * 150
If max acceptable loss = $1M: vega_notional = $1M / 150 = $6,667
Straddle/strangle position:
Compute max loss under stress (e.g., -20% move with vol at 60%)
Size so that stress loss < risk limit (typically 2-5% of NAV)
Rule of thumb for short vol:
Allocate max 3-5% of portfolio NAV as potential loss
This limits notional short vol exposure significantly
Volmageddon (Feb 2018): XIV lost 96% in one dayQuality Gate
Before deploying a volatility trading strategy:
- VRP measured correctly (IV vs RV comparison over relevant period)
- Tail risk quantified: max historical loss modeled (2008, 2018, 2020)
- Position sized for tail scenario, not average scenario
- Tail hedge in place if selling vol (OTM puts, VIX calls, or capped variance)
- Greeks managed: delta-hedge frequency and cost estimated
- Roll cost calculated for VIX futures strategies (contango bleed)
- Dispersion correlation risk stress-tested (crisis correlation = 0.8+)
- Margin requirements modeled under stress (exchanges raise margins in vol spikes)
- Kill switch defined: exit triggers for drawdown, VIX level, or term structure inversion
- P&L attribution separates: VRP harvest, gamma scalping, theta decay, and mark-to-market
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

