qa-test-engineer
Skill9 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
QA and test engineering expert: testing strategies (TDD/BDD), unit testing (Jest/Vitest/pytest), integration testing, E2E testing (Playwright/Cypress), load testing (k6/Artillery), API testing, test automation frameworks, CI test pipelines, code coverage, and quality metrics. Use when: (1) writing or reviewing tests, (2) designing test strategies for features, (3) setting up test automation, (4) debugging flaky tests, (5) implementing TDD/BDD workflows, (6) configuring test coverage and CI integration, (7) performance/load testing. NOT for: writing application business logic or UI design.
- Installs packages
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- younss/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- younss/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-ml-engineerSkill
- backend-developerSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- database-administratorSkill
- data-engineerSkill
- devops-engineerSkill
- frontend-developerSkill
- fullstack-developerSkill
- mobile-developerSkill
- security-engineerSkill
- senior-java-developerSkill
- system-architectSkill
- tech-leadSkill
The file
Files
QA/Test Engineer
Expert guidance for testing strategies, automation, and quality assurance.
Core Competencies
1. Testing Pyramid
/ E2E \ Few, slow, high confidence
/ Integration \ Medium number, medium speed
/ Unit Tests \ Many, fast, focused
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
Ratio guidance: 70% unit / 20% integration / 10% E2E
Unit: Test functions/components in isolation
Integration: Test modules working together (API + DB)
E2E: Test user flows through real browser/app
Contract: Verify API contracts between services
Performance: Load/stress/soak tests2. Unit Testing Patterns
// Vitest/Jest - Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
describe('OrderService', () => {
it('applies discount for orders over $100', () => {
// Arrange
const order = createOrder({ items: [{ price: 120, qty: 1 }] });
// Act
const result = applyDiscount(order);
// Assert
expect(result.total).toBe(108); // 10% off
expect(result.discountApplied).toBe(true);
});
it('throws on empty cart', () => {
expect(() => applyDiscount(createOrder({ items: [] })))
.toThrow('Cart is empty');
});
});
// Test doubles
const mockPayment = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ status: 'success' });
const spyLogger = vi.spyOn(logger, 'info');What to Test (Unit)
Pure functions: Input → output (always test these)
Edge cases: null, empty, boundary values, overflow
Error paths: Invalid input, network failures, timeouts
State transitions: Before → action → after
Business rules: Pricing, permissions, validation logic
What NOT to unit test:
- Framework internals (React rendering, Express routing)
- Third-party library behavior
- Trivial getters/setters
- Implementation details (private methods)3. Integration Testing
// API integration test (supertest + real DB)
describe('POST /api/users', () => {
beforeEach(async () => {
await db.migrate.latest();
await db.seed.run();
});
afterEach(async () => {
await db.migrate.rollback();
});
it('creates user and returns 201', async () => {
const res = await request(app)
.post('/api/users')
.send({ email: 'new@test.com', name: 'Test' })
.expect(201);
expect(res.body.data).toMatchObject({
email: 'new@test.com',
name: 'Test',
});
// Verify side effects
const dbUser = await db('users').where({ email: 'new@test.com' }).first();
expect(dbUser).toBeTruthy();
});
it('rejects duplicate email with 409', async () => {
await request(app)
.post('/api/users')
.send({ email: 'existing@test.com', name: 'Dupe' })
.expect(409);
});
});4. E2E Testing (Playwright)
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
test.describe('Checkout Flow', () => {
test('completes purchase as logged-in user', async ({ page }) => {
// Login
await page.goto('/login');
await page.fill('[name=email]', 'user@test.com');
await page.fill('[name=password]', 'password123');
await page.click('button[type=submit]');
await expect(page).toHaveURL('/dashboard');
// Add to cart
await page.goto('/products');
await page.click('[data-testid="product-1"] >> text=Add to Cart');
await expect(page.locator('.cart-count')).toHaveText('1');
// Checkout
await page.click('text=Checkout');
await page.fill('[name=address]', '123 Test St');
await page.click('text=Place Order');
// Verify
await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/orders\/\d+/);
await expect(page.locator('.order-status')).toHaveText('Confirmed');
});
});5. Test Strategy by Feature Type
CRUD Feature:
Unit: Validate input, test service logic
Integ: API endpoint + database round-trip
E2E: Create → Read → Update → Delete flow
Auth Feature:
Unit: Token generation, password hashing
Integ: Login → token → protected endpoint
E2E: Register → login → access → logout
Payment Feature:
Unit: Price calculation, discount logic
Integ: Order creation → mock payment gateway
E2E: Add to cart → checkout → confirmation (sandbox)
Real-time Feature:
Unit: Message parsing, event handling
Integ: WebSocket connect → send → receive
E2E: Two-user chat scenario6. Dealing with Flaky Tests
Common Causes:
- Timing: race conditions, animations, async
- State: shared DB/files, test order dependency
- Network: external API calls, DNS
- Environment: timezone, locale, OS differences
Fixes:
Timing: → Use proper waits/assertions, not sleep()
State: → Isolate per-test (fresh DB, unique IDs)
Network: → Mock external services (MSW, WireMock)
Env: → Pin timezone, use Docker for consistency
Detection:
- Run tests 10x in CI to find intermittent failures
- Track flaky test rate as a team metric
- Quarantine flaky tests (don't block CI, fix quickly)7. CI Integration
# GitHub Actions test pipeline
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
services:
postgres:
image: postgres:17
env: { POSTGRES_DB: test, POSTGRES_PASSWORD: test }
ports: ["5432:5432"]
options: >-
--health-cmd pg_isready
--health-interval 5s
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with: { node-version: 22, cache: pnpm }
- run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
- run: pnpm test:unit -- --coverage
- run: pnpm test:integration
- run: pnpm test:e2e
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: failure()
with:
name: playwright-report
path: playwright-report/Quick Commands
# Run tests
pnpm vitest run # Unit tests
pnpm vitest run --coverage # With coverage
pnpm playwright test # E2E
pnpm playwright test --ui # E2E with UI
# Debug
pnpm vitest run --reporter=verbose
pnpm playwright test --debug # Step-by-step
pnpm playwright codegen # Record test
# Load testing
k6 run loadtest.js
artillery run scenario.ymlReferences
- Testing patterns: See references/testing-patterns.md
- Load testing guide: See references/load-testing.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

