team-security-review
Skill11 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use for running the Team security review phase only on explicit request. Never infer from a plain security review request. Reviews and fixes the branch.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- create-team-skillSkill
- version-bumpSkill
- team-code-reviewSkill
- team-designSkill
- team-fixSkill
- team-implementSkill
- team-migrateSkill
- team-planSkill
- team-prSkill
- team-questionSkill
- team-researchSkill
- teamSkill
- team-structureSkill
- team-updateSkill
- team-worktreeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Before each dispatch or retry, read host dispatch and supply its resolved installed paths.
- Distinctive: line 11
Before artifact work, read artifact schema.
- Distinctive: line 12
Before the tier sort, read finding format.
- Distinctive: line 13
Before each consuming step, read its linked shared rules from this installed skill directory.
- Distinctive: line 14
If a required read fails, stop that step with the exact path.
- Distinctive: line 15
Before finalizing prose you author, read the writing standards.
- Very specific: line 19
Run after CODE REVIEW passes.
- Very specific: line 21
Run the review loop that the team-code-review execution reference states, with the deltas in Execution.
- Very specific: line 22
Write one security-review-<n>.md per completed round.
- Distinctive: line 24
Never: stop to ask the user which Blocking or Major items to address (the no-consult rule).
- Very specific: line 27
Never load team-code-review or team-pr.
- Distinctive: line 31
Read each reference completely when reaching that stage.
- Distinctive: line 38
Read and apply: execution rules.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Team Security Review
Before each dispatch or retry, read host dispatch and supply its resolved installed paths. Before artifact work, read artifact schema. Before the tier sort, read finding format. Before each consuming step, read its linked shared rules from this installed skill directory. If a required read fails, stop that step with the exact path. Never use checkout fallback or recursive loading. Before finalizing prose you author, read the writing standards. Relay completed reviewer reports unchanged.
Core contracts
- Run after CODE REVIEW passes. Require the
team-code-reviewentry conditions, plus a newestreview-<n>.mdthat is PASS and current. - Dispatch
security-revieweralone. No other phase dispatches it. - Run the review loop that the
team-code-reviewexecution reference states, with the deltas in Execution. - Write one
security-review-<n>.mdper completed round. Never overwrite a record. - Seed TodoWrite with
Security review round <n>. Retry asSecurity review round <n+1> (<b> Blocking, <m> Major open). - Never stop to ask the user which Blocking or Major items to address (the no-consult rule).
- The loop has no count cap. It ends only when no Blocking or Major finding remains.
- At PASS, when the TodoWrite ledger holds a
PRphase item, return to the/teamphase loop in the same turn. Otherwise, print the Next line that Execution step 9 names. - Never load
team-code-revieworteam-pr.
Procedure references
Read each reference completely when reaching that stage. Follow them in order.
- Input
- Execution
Applied principles
Read and apply: execution rules.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

