run-flow
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Adopt and execute the installed agents_pipeline bounded flow workflow with at most five tasks, risk-derived verification, and an optional reviewer gate. Use when the user explicitly invokes `$run-flow` or requests the normal multi-task agents_pipeline engineering flow.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- artgen-scaffoldSkill
- decideSkill
- devtools-ux-auditSkill
- frontend-aesthetic-directorSkill
- run-adaptiveSkill
- run-analysisSkill
- run-ciSkill
- run-committeeSkill
- run-generalSkill
- run-modernizeSkill
- run-pipelineSkill
- run-simpleSkill
- run-specSkill
- run-uxSkill
- ui-communication-designerSkill
- ui-ux-workflowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use the installed orchestrator-flow definition as the authoritative workflow.
- Very specific: line 10
Read ${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/agents/orchestrator-flow.toml as the authoritative workflow.
- Very specific: line 12
If the global definition is absent, stop and ask for the global agents_pipeline Codex install.
- Very specific: line 13
Remove only the $run-flow token and preserve the remaining request and flags as raw input.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run Flow
Use the installed orchestrator-flow definition as the authoritative workflow.
- Read
${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/agents/orchestrator-flow.tomlas the authoritative workflow. Never manually adopt a raw workspace role; the preflight below decides whether effective Codex config may apply workspace routing. - Always query the installed global profile manager for current-workspace JSON status before adopting the workflow. A normal workspace without a profile reports global inheritance and may continue. If status cannot be verified or a configured profile's
healthis notok, stop and ask the user to rerun workspacesetorclear; never dispatch through an unhealthy or orphaned profile. If a configured profile'scatalog_stateis notcurrent, stop before dispatch and require explicit workspaceset --model-set openaiorclear. If itsprofile_eligibilityis noteligible, warn that Codex is ignoring the workspace layer and continue with global role routing. Only a healthy, eligible, current profile may route dispatched roles locally. For that eligible path, retain each role's exact savedresolved_configurationfrom the selected versioned model set and registered reasoning projection, including its configuration identity, version, and digest. Pass that same envelope to the formal shared resolver and trace expectations. The resolver selects effort only, so native managed normal dispatch omits a raw model; a Web session agent Job selects only the saved role model underprotocols/REASONING_POLICY.md. Retired Codex model sets are not eligible for new dispatch. - If the global definition is absent, stop and ask for the global agents_pipeline Codex install. Do not reconstruct the workflow from memory.
- Remove only the
$run-flowtoken and preserve the remaining request and flags as raw input. - Adopt the definition in the current/main agent; do not spawn the same orchestrator merely to enter the mode.
- Obey its task bound, delegation, verification, review, cleanup, reasoning, and final-report constraints. The formal shared resolver resolves each dispatched role's effort without changing the current/main agent. Native managed dispatch uses effective Codex role routing, normally omits a model override, and verifies the local child trace before claiming adaptive enforcement. A Web session agent Job instead selects the saved role model explicitly, applies effort only in adaptive mode, observes one Job to terminal, and follows the result and status limits in
protocols/REASONING_POLICY.md; it never claims native role identity or trace enforcement. The sole native managed auto-recovery exception remains inprotocols/CAPABILITY_RECOVERY.mdand requires matching trace evidence.--review=maxremains an exact reviewer-only effort gate: adaptive requests and verifies it on the native surface, shadow records it without applying it, and inherit conflicts. It remains deep ordinary review, never applies to a non-review role, and is unavailable on the Job surface until supported evidence exists.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

