agentleFS
blueOctopusAIblueOctopusAI/intel-hub/.claude/skills/research/skill.md

research

Skill0 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Process a link through the full intelligence pipeline. Read config.json at the project root for business context. A URL to research: /research <URL> This skill uses the intake-log status as a checkpoint. Update the status after each major step so progress is visible and recoverable: On failure: The intake-log status shows exactly where it stopped. To resume, check the status and pick up from that step. Do NOT re-run completed steps. For tweets/X posts: - Use WebFetch on the URL…

189 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • LambenthanSkill

    daily-arxiv

    每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • LambenthanSkill

    exp-eval

    实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • truongtv22Skill

    Problem-Solving Techniques

    Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for complexity spirals (simplification cascades), innovation blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from Microsoft Amplifier project patterns adapted for immediate application.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • skyllwtSkill

    exp-pilot-eval

    Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • skyllwtSkill

    exp-pilot-run

    Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +5 more from Lambenthan
  • +1 more from skyllwt

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

30 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 21 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 9

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 21

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read config.json to get the business name, categories, and voice settings

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    Read data/research/intelligence-brief.md to understand existing signals and context

    line 12
  3. Very specific:

    Read data/portfolio/projects.md to know what projects are active

    line 13
  4. Very specific:

    Add to the TOP of data/research/intake-log.md:

    line 35
  5. Distinctive:

    Use WebFetch on the URL

    line 43
  6. Distinctive:

    If the tweet references an article, repo, or video — fetch THAT too

    line 44
  7. Distinctive:

    If the tweet has a thread, try to get the full thread

    line 45
  8. Distinctive:

    Use WebFetch to read the full article

    line 48
  9. Very specific:

    Create placeholder in data/knowledge/transcripts/ with metadata

    line 54
  10. Very specific:

    Create evaluation in data/knowledge/tools/

    line 58
  11. Distinctive:

    Do NOT install tools — add to user's task list

    line 59
  12. Distinctive:

    Read and extract the full methodology

    line 62
  13. Very specific:

    Create a file in data/knowledge/strategies/

    line 63
  14. Very specific:

    Checkpoint: Update intake-log status to step-2/9 before fetching.

    line 65
  15. Very specific:

    Read the business categories from config.json and evaluate the content through EACH lens.

    line 69
  16. Distinctive:

    If a category doesn't apply to this content, say so briefly and move on.

    line 71
  17. Very specific:

    Checkpoint: After analysis, update to step-4/9.

    line 73
  18. Very specific:

    If this is a deep methodology or strategy: create a file in data/knowledge/strategies/

    line 76
  19. Very specific:

    If this is a tool evaluation: create a file in data/knowledge/tools/

    line 77
  20. Very specific:

    If it's a transcript: create placeholder in data/knowledge/transcripts/

    line 78
  21. Very specific:

    Checkpoint: After knowledge base updates, update to step-5/9.

    line 80
  22. Very specific:

    Add to the appropriate topic section in data/research/bookmarks.md

    line 83
  23. Very specific:

    If this reveals a new signal or changes an existing one, update data/research/intelligence-brief.md

    line 84
  24. Very specific:

    If the author produces consistently valuable content, add to data/research/people-to-watch.md

    line 85
  25. Very specific:

    Checkpoint: After docs updated, update to step-6/9.

    line 87
  26. Very specific:

    Read data/portfolio/projects.md.

    line 114
  27. Very specific:

    If the research suggests something worth building, adopting, or offering — add it to data/portfolio/implementation-backlog.md with status …

    line 117
  28. Very specific:

    Checkpoint: After backlog updated, change intake-log status to actioned.

    line 119
  29. Distinctive:

    When encountering inaccessible content, use these before marking as user task:

    line 123
  30. Distinctive:

    Follow the thread — if they reference something, fetch it

    line 146

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
skill.md

Research Intelligence Processor

Process a link through the full intelligence pipeline. Read config.json at the project root for business context.

Input

A URL to research: /research <URL>

Before Starting

  1. Read config.json to get the business name, categories, and voice settings
  2. Read data/research/intelligence-brief.md to understand existing signals and context
  3. Read data/portfolio/projects.md to know what projects are active

Checkpointing

This skill uses the intake-log status as a checkpoint. Update the status after each major step so progress is visible and recoverable:

StatusMeaning
pendingLogged but not yet started
step-2/9Fetching content
step-3/9Analyzing for business applicability
step-4/9Updating knowledge base
step-5/9Updating docs (bookmarks, brief, people)
step-6/9Reporting to user
processedSteps 1-7 complete
actionedSteps 8-9 done — ideas logged

On failure: The intake-log status shows exactly where it stopped. To resume, check the status and pick up from that step. Do NOT re-run completed steps.

Pipeline

Step 1: Log

Add to the TOP of data/research/intake-log.md:

`[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]` | pending | Title (@author if known) | URL

Step 2: Fetch & Understand

For tweets/X posts:

  • Use WebFetch on the URL
  • If the tweet references an article, repo, or video — fetch THAT too
  • If the tweet has a thread, try to get the full thread

For articles:

  • Use WebFetch to read the full article
  • Extract: thesis, key claims, methodology, data points, tools mentioned

For videos (YouTube, X video, etc.):

  • Get title, description, duration from the page
  • Mark as pending-transcript — the USER generates transcripts
  • Create placeholder in data/knowledge/transcripts/ with metadata

For GitHub repos/tools:

  • Fetch README, check stars, recent activity
  • Create evaluation in data/knowledge/tools/
  • Do NOT install tools — add to user's task list

For strategies/guides:

  • Read and extract the full methodology
  • Create a file in data/knowledge/strategies/

Checkpoint: Update intake-log status to step-2/9 before fetching. After successful fetch, update to step-3/9.

Step 3: Analyze for Business Applicability

Read the business categories from config.json and evaluate the content through EACH lens. For every category, answer: "What does this mean for the business? What should they DO?"

If a category doesn't apply to this content, say so briefly and move on.

Checkpoint: After analysis, update to step-4/9.

Step 4: Update Knowledge Base

  • If this is a deep methodology or strategy: create a file in data/knowledge/strategies/
  • If this is a tool evaluation: create a file in data/knowledge/tools/
  • If it's a transcript: create placeholder in data/knowledge/transcripts/

Checkpoint: After knowledge base updates, update to step-5/9.

Step 5: Update Docs

  • Add to the appropriate topic section in data/research/bookmarks.md
  • If this reveals a new signal or changes an existing one, update data/research/intelligence-brief.md
  • If the author produces consistently valuable content, add to data/research/people-to-watch.md

Checkpoint: After docs updated, update to step-6/9.

Step 6: Report

Show the user a structured summary:

## Research: "Title"

**Source:** domain.com | Date
**Relevance:** HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW — one sentence why

### Analysis

**[Category 1]:** What this means + what to do
**[Category 2]:** What this means + what to do
...

### Actions Added
- [ ] Specific action item (Project: which project)

### Updated Files
- file1.md (what changed)

Step 7: Mark Processed

Change the intake-log entry from pending to processed.

Step 8: Cross-Project Check

Read data/portfolio/projects.md. Does this research affect any active project? If yes, add a recommendation to the Recommendations table.

Step 9: Log Ideas

If the research suggests something worth building, adopting, or offering — add it to data/portfolio/implementation-backlog.md with status idea.

Checkpoint: After backlog updated, change intake-log status to actioned.

Content Access Workarounds

When encountering inaccessible content, use these before marking as user task:

Content TypeWorkaround
X.com tweetsSyndication API: cdn.syndication.twimg.com/tweet-result?id=<ID>&token=x
PDFsSearch for web article summaries/reviews
JS-rendered pagesTry raw/API versions, search for content elsewhere
YouTube videosMark pending-transcript — user generates. Create placeholder in data/knowledge/transcripts/
GitHub reposFetch raw README via raw.githubusercontent.com/<owner>/<repo>/main/README.md

When you can't access something: Log it to data/research/intelligence-brief.md with what the content is, why it matters, what was attempted, and what user action is needed.

Division of Labor

Claude does: Fetch, read, analyze, document, maintain all research files, create action items. User does: Generate transcripts, install/test tools, engage on social, create published content.

Principles

  • Depth over speed — understand the content fully before analyzing
  • Business lens — every insight must connect to an action
  • Honest assessment — don't hype things that aren't ready
  • Connect dots — link to existing signals and knowledge
  • Follow the thread — if they reference something, fetch it
  • Track people, not just content — add high-value producers to people-to-watch.md

ARGUMENTS: url

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.