project-documentation
Skill1 starsChanged 11 months agoMITView on GitHub
Update and maintain project documentation including CLAUDE.md, API docs, architecture docs, and data model specs. Use when updating docs, documenting features, or after completing sprints.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SWEStash/swe-workflow-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Garfield247/agent-skill-project-documentationtheir own version, first seen Oct 22, 2026
- NAVANEETHVVINOD/agent-orchestratortheir own version, first seen Oct 3, 2026
- realtrung/AGENTS.mdtheir own version, first seen Jul 11, 2026
- wpank/aitheir own version, first seen Feb 10, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- wpank/ai★ 11same name
- realtrung/AGENTS.md★ 2same name
- SWEStash/swe-workflow-skills★ 1same name
- Garfield247/agent-skill-project-documentation★ 0same name
- NAVANEETHVVINOD/agent-orchestrator★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- fastapi-backendSkill
- llm-integrationSkill
- nextjs-frontendSkill
- python-testingSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- sqlalchemy-databaseSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Update phase status (COMPLETE/IN PROGRESS)
- Distinctive: line 29
Add new fields with types
- Distinctive: line 31
Update JSON schema examples
- Distinctive: line 36
Add to service map diagram
- Distinctive: line 38
Add to API endpoints table
- Very specific: line 57
Use backticks for code and file_paths
- Distinctive: line 58
Use code blocks with language tags
- Distinctive: line 59
Use tables for structured data
- Distinctive: line 60
Keep line length reasonable (~80 chars)
- Distinctive: line 64
Update docs immediately after changes
- Very specific: line 65
Keep IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md current
- Distinctive: line 66
Document all schema changes
- Distinctive: line 68
Commit docs with related code changes
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ETPS Documentation Management
Key Documents
| Document | Purpose | Update When |
CLAUDE.md | Project config for Claude Code | Workflows change |
ETPS_PRD.md | Product Requirements (source of truth) | Requirements change |
docs/IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md | Sprint roadmap | Sprint completes |
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md | System architecture | Services added |
docs/DATA_MODEL.md | Database schema | Models change |
docs/cover_letter_style_guide.md | AI writing rules | Style rules change |
Update Triggers
After Completing a Sprint
Update docs/IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md:
- Mark completed tasks with [x]
- Update phase status (COMPLETE/IN PROGRESS)
- Update test count
- Note any blockers or changes
After Changing Database Models
Update docs/DATA_MODEL.md:
- Add new fields with types
- Update relationships diagram
- Update JSON schema examples
- Increment version (e.g., v1.4.2 -> v1.4.3)
After Adding Services
Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md:
- Add to service map diagram
- Document inputs/outputs
- Add to API endpoints table
Version Numbering
Major.Minor.Patch
│ │ └── Documentation clarifications
│ └──────── New fields/entities
└────────────── Breaking schema changesCurrent Status
- Phase 1A-1C: COMPLETE (Sprints 1-14)
- Live URLs:
- Frontend: https://etps.benjaminblack.consulting
- Backend: https://etps-production.up.railway.app
- Tests: 700+ passing
- Next: Phase 2 (Sprints 15-17) - Company Intelligence
Documentation Style
- Use backticks for
codeandfile_paths - Use code blocks with language tags
- Use tables for structured data
- Keep line length reasonable (~80 chars)
- Link between related documents
Best Practices
- Update docs immediately after changes
- Keep IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md current
- Document all schema changes
- Include examples in technical docs
- Commit docs with related code changes
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

