skill-creator
Skill8 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Interactive skill builder: guides the user through defining a new skill as a structured SOP, then generates the SKILL.md and installs it.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SebastienDegodez/copilot-instructionstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- idavidov13/agentic-playwrighttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- HughYau/AcademicForgetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ar9av/obsidian-wikitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rvdbreemen/OTGW-firmwaretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- scenario-labs/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use taskflow-inbox-triage, mermaid-diagram-generator and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AtomicBot-aiSkilltaskflow-inbox-triage
Also in 6 projects that use this
shalombSkillmermaid-diagram-generator
Guide on creating and editing Mermaid charts safely. Use when asked to draw a diagram, flowchart, or architecture chart. Triggers on: 'mermaid', 'diagram', 'flowchart', 'visualize'.
Also in 5 projects that use this
naman10parikhSkillecosystem-reference
Quick-access directory of Claude Code ecosystem repos, skills, plugins, MCPs, and patterns. Use when improving the harness.
Also in 5 projects that use this
naman10parikhSkillfractal-delegation
Also in 5 projects that use this
Liang-MHSkillstock_analysis
获取 A 股、基金和港股的实时行情和技术分析数据
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +6 more from naman10parikh
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/warelay★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- anthropics/skills★ 189ksame name
- openai/codex★ 134ksame name
- google-gemini/gemini-cli★ 109ksame name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/rules/common/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-creatorSkill
- architect-reviewSkill
- build-fixSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deep-diveSkill
- docsSkill
- incident-debugSkill
- performance-reviewSkill
- planSkill
- qaSkill
- ralphSkill
- refactor-cleanSkill
- rule-creatorSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 185 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
No args — ask the user what skill they want to create
- Distinctive: line 66
Check for name collisions:
- Distinctive: line 70
If a skill with the same name exists, warn and ask to proceed or rename.
- Distinctive: line 72
Ask the user these questions (batch them, don't ask one at a time):
- Distinctive: line 84
If the user's description is vague, present 2-3 structured interpretations:
- Distinctive: line 118
APPROVAL GATE: Wait for user to approve the structure.
- Distinctive: line 124
Read 1-2 existing skills for tone and formatting reference:
- Distinctive: line 213
Ask the user if they also want a global slash command:
- Distinctive: line 216
If yes, create the command file:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 185 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/skill-creator
Build a new toolkit skill interactively. Each skill is a mini SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) — scoped, self-contained, with clear inputs, process, human gates, and defined output.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
<skill-name>— name for the new skill (e.g.,/skill-creator api-designer)- No args — ask the user what skill they want to create
Goal
Generate a production-ready SKILL.md file that follows the toolkit's SOP structure, install it into the project's .claude/skills/ directory, and optionally register it as a global slash command.
Dependencies
Tools
Read— read existing skills for pattern referenceWrite— create the SKILL.md fileBash— install to project, optionally register global commandGlob— find existing skills to avoid name collisions
Connectors
- None required (fully local)
Context
Skills follow a strict SOP structure:
1. Name & Trigger — skill-name + when Claude should activate
2. Goal — one clear desired-outcome
3. Dependencies — tools, connectors, MCP servers needed
4. Context — background knowledge Claude needs
5. Process — step-by-step with human checkpoints (APPROVAL GATEs)
6. Output — where result goes + what the final deliverable isCritical rules:
- Skills are NOT fully autonomous — they MUST have at least one human checkpoint
- Each phase should be a discrete, reviewable unit of work
- Error handling must be explicit (table of situations → actions)
- An internal checklist at the end ensures nothing is missed
Process
Phase 1: Intake — Understand the Skill
- Parse
$ARGUMENTSfor skill name. If empty, ask:"What skill do you want to create? Describe what it should do in 1-2 sentences."
- Check for name collisions:
If a skill with the same name exists, warn and ask to proceed or rename.Glob: .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md Ask the user these questions (batch them, don't ask one at a time):
Skill Definition Questionnaire:
- What does this skill do? (one sentence — this becomes the Goal)
- When should it trigger? (e.g., "when the user types /foo", "when reviewing PRs")
- What inputs does it need? (arguments, files, context)
- What does it produce? (file, PR, report, code changes)
- Are there external tools needed? (MCP servers, APIs, CLIs)
- How many phases? (suggest 3-6 based on complexity)
- Where should the user approve/review? (which phase boundaries)
- If the user's description is vague, present 2-3 structured interpretations:
"I see a few ways to interpret this. Which fits best?"
APPROVAL GATE: Present the interpreted spec back to the user. Wait for confirmation.
Phase 2: Design — Structure the Phases
- Based on the intake answers, design the phase breakdown:
- Each phase gets: name, numbered steps, and clear completion criteria
- Insert
**APPROVAL GATE**markers where the user indicated review points - At minimum: one gate after planning, one before final output
- For each phase, determine:
- What tools/commands are needed
- What information flows from the previous phase
- What can fail and how to handle it
- Design the error handling table:
Situation Action - Design the internal checklist (verification steps before the skill completes)
- Present the full phase outline to the user:
Proposed Structure:
- Phase 1: [name] — [what it does]
- APPROVAL GATE after this phase
- Phase 2: [name] — [what it does]
- Phase 3: [name] — [what it does]
- APPROVAL GATE after this phase
- Output: [deliverable] → [location]
- Phase 1: [name] — [what it does]
APPROVAL GATE: Wait for user to approve the structure. Accept modifications.
Phase 3: Generate — Write the SKILL.md
- Read 1-2 existing skills for tone and formatting reference:
Read: .claude/skills/plan/SKILL.md Read: .claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md Generate the full SKILL.md following this template:
--- name: <skill-name> description: "<one-line description>" --- # /<skill-name> <2-3 sentence overview> ## Arguments: $ARGUMENTS - `<arg>` — description - No args — default behavior --- ## Goal <One clear desired-outcome sentence> --- ## Dependencies ### Tools - `<Tool>` — why needed ### Connectors - `<MCP server or API>` — why needed - None required (if none) --- ## Context <Background knowledge Claude needs to execute this skill properly> --- ## Phase 1: <Name> 1. Step one 2. Step two 3. Present findings to user **APPROVAL GATE**: <what the user reviews> --- ## Phase 2: <Name> ... --- ## Error Handling | Situation | Action | |-----------|--------| | <situation> | <action> | ## Checklist (Internal — verify before completing) - [ ] Item 1 - [ ] Item 2- Present the generated SKILL.md content to the user for review.
APPROVAL GATE: User reviews the full SKILL.md. Accept edits before writing.
Phase 4: Install — Deploy the Skill
- Write the file:
Write: .claude/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md - Ask the user if they also want a global slash command:
"Want to register
/<skill-name>as a global command? (works across all projects)" - If yes, create the command file:
# Template for ~/.claude/commands/<skill-name>.md Read and execute the skill defined in .claude/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md User arguments: $ARGUMENTS - Verify the install:
Glob: .claude/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md - Report to user:
"Skill installed:
.claude/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md- Global command:
/<skill-name>(if registered)
Try it:
/<skill-name> <example-args>"
Error Handling
| Situation | Action |
| Skill name already exists | Warn user, offer to overwrite or rename |
| User gives vague description | Present 2-3 interpretations to choose from |
No .claude/skills/ directory | Create it |
| Generated skill is too complex (>6 phases) | Suggest splitting into two skills |
| User wants to edit after install | Re-read, apply edits, re-write |
Checklist (Internal — verify before completing)
- Skill name is unique (no collision)
- SKILL.md follows SOP structure (name, goal, deps, context, process, output)
- At least one APPROVAL GATE exists in the process
- Error handling table is populated
- Internal checklist is populated
- File written to
.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md - Global command registered (if user requested)
- User shown how to invoke the new skill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

