rt-fix-logic-bugs
Skill576 starsChanged 17 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Picks a tricky logic domain — billing and pricing math, OpenFGA authz scope decisions, blueprint plan diffs — models it explicitly with invariants, truth tables, and property tests, and fixes the real bugs the model surfaces with regression tests. Use when the user asks to run the rt-fix-logic-bugs routine, hunt for logic bugs, or property-test a subsystem.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- dashboard/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- lego/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- mobile/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .pm/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- deploy-app-from-localSkill
- deploy-appSkill
- loopxSkill
- mermaidSkill
- mock-clusterSkill
- pm-brainstormSkill
- pmSkill
- qa-find-bugs-cliSkill
- qa-find-bugsSkill
- releaseSkill
- rt-fix-prod-crashesSkill
- rt-flatten-abstractionsSkill
- rt-normalize-abstractionsSkill
- rt-prune-useless-testsSkill
- rt-remove-dead-codeSkill
- rt-simplify-logicSkill
- rt-unify-duplicatesSkill
- security-auditSkill
- shipSkill
- simplifySkill
- stripe-best-practicesSkill
- stripe-directorySkill
- stripe-docsSkill
- stripe-projectsSkill
- unblockSkill
- upgrade-stripeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
After the verification phase, follow the shipping phase below without asking the user to invoke ship separately.
- Very specific: line 19
Every change must pass the verification gates for the modules it touched before being reported as done: operator make test + make lint …
- Very specific: line 20
Run npx prettier@3.4.2 --write on any markdown touched.
- Distinctive: line 21
Before shipping, summarize results in commentary using: Fixed (file:line + one-line rationale) / Deferred (item + why) / Skipped (finding + …
- Very specific: line 39
Write property/table tests in the package's _test.go: testing/quick or hand-rolled generators for pure functions.
- Distinctive: line 50
Run gates for touched modules.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Routine: Logic Bugfixer
Model tricky business logic explicitly, then let the model find the bugs. The tests written here persist as durable property coverage.
Routine ground rules
- A user request to run this routine authorizes the full cycle: plan, fix, verify, then invoke
$ship(Codex) or/ship(Claude) directly in the same run. Honor explicit user limits such as audit-only or no-ship. - Keep a concise execution plan in the conversation and update it as findings are confirmed. Continue into implementation without a planning approval pause. Do not create or file a
.pmmilestone/task as a prerequisite or substitute for fixing; use the board only if the user requests it. - After the verification phase, follow the shipping phase below without asking the user to invoke ship separately. Preserve the ship skill's branch, conflict-resolution, and safety rules.
- Fix everything you find directly in the working tree. If a fix can't be finished safely in this run, revert only your partial work for that fix and list it under Deferred in the report — never leave the tree half-refactored.
- Scope: parse
$ARGUMENTSper Phase 1 — an optional path/module scope or skill-specific target. No argument = the skill's stated default (usually the whole repo via parallel agents per module: lego/types, lego/operator, lego/backend, lego/cli, dashboard). - False-positive discipline: if a finding is intentional, load-bearing, or ambiguous, skip it with a one-line reason — don't argue it into a change.
- Every change must pass the verification gates for the modules it touched before being reported as done: operator
make test+make lint(fromlego/operator/),cd lego/backend && go test ./...,cd lego/cli && go test ./..., dashboardyarn test+ typecheck. - Run
npx prettier@3.4.2 --writeon any markdown touched. - Before shipping, summarize results in commentary using: Fixed (file:line + one-line rationale) / Deferred (item + why) / Skipped (finding + reason) / Gates (commands run + outcomes).
Phase 1 — Scope
Parse $ARGUMENTS: billing | authz | blueprint-plan | a package path. Empty → pick the least-recently-audited domain (git log -1 --format=%cd on each candidate below) and announce the choice.
Domain map:
- billing —
lego/backend/internal/apps/blueprint_pricing.go,stripeBillingGateinlego/backend/cmd/api/billing_config.go - authz —
lego/backend/internal/authzandlego/backend/internal/core/scope.go(OpenFGA relationship model) - blueprint-plan —
lego/backend/internal/apps/blueprint_plan.goand the plan/apply cycle
Phase 2 — Model the logic
Before hunting bugs, state the intended invariants in the conversation: e.g. "pricing is monotonic in replica count and disk size", "scope checks are deny-by-default", "plan(apply(plan)) is empty", "compile is deterministic". Build truth tables for boolean decision functions. Read the governing ADRs (docs/ADR030-pricing.md, docs/ADR012-auth.md, docs/ADR024-members.md) — the model must capture intent, not implementation.
Phase 3 — Encode the model as tests
Write property/table tests in the package's _test.go: testing/quick or hand-rolled generators for pure functions; the full scope × role matrix for authz; plan/apply round-trips for blueprint-plan. These tests persist as durable coverage.
Phase 4 — Judge each failure
A failing property is one of:
- Model error — the code is right and your invariant was wrong. Fix the test and record the true invariant in a test comment.
- Real bug — root-cause and fix the code, keeping the failing case as a named regression test.
Phase 5 — Verify and report
Run gates for touched modules; report per the standard format, listing invariants encoded, bugs fixed, and model errors learned.
Final phase — Ship
After all required gates pass, read and execute the ship skill for the routine's completed changes. Stage only intended changes from this run; preserve unrelated work. Do not end at a plan, findings report, milestone, or request for shipping approval. If there are no changes, report that outcome without creating an empty commit. If a required gate remains blocked or fails after reasonable repairs, report the exact blocker and do not ship unverified changes.
Once the push succeeds, report the shipped HEAD SHA and subject per the ship skill and stop; do not monitor CI or deployment.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

