security-audit
Skill0 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when reviewing code for security issues, checking for injection/auth flaws, exposed secrets, unsafe deserialization, or when the user asks for a security audit or vulnerability review.
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- chuanglibs/Claude-Code-Game-Studios-Codextheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- swap-cameroon/kuro-antigravity-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- XavierEr/appsec-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- karlo-ks/Infradecktheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- PostHog/posthogtheir own version, first seen Nov 14, 2026
- PostHog/posthog-fosstheir own version, first seen Nov 14, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +7 more from lilangMax
- +1 more from nicepkg
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 192
- ruvnet/claude-flow★ 80ksame name
- ruvnet/ruflo★ 79ksame name
- PostHog/posthog★ 41ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 39ksame name
- cloudflare/security-audit-skill★ 18ksame name
- rommapp/romm★ 14ksame name
- kubeshark/kubeshark★ 12ksame name
- maximhq/bifrost★ 9.4ksame name
- mono/SkiaSharp★ 5.6ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Company★ 3.2ksame name
182 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- offline-first-workflowSkill
- privacy-reviewSkill
- safe-browser-agentSkill
- secrets-handlingSkill
- session-startSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 174 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Before merging code that touches auth, input handling, file I/O, or external requests
- Distinctive: line 12
When reviewing a PR/diff that adds a new API endpoint, form, or data parser
- Distinctive: line 16
Check for these categories, in order:
- Distinctive: line 24
Never attempt to exploit, run, or demonstrate the vulnerability.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 174 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Security Audit
When to Use
- The user asks for a security review, audit, or "check this for vulnerabilities"
- Before merging code that touches auth, input handling, file I/O, or external requests
- When reviewing a PR/diff that adds a new API endpoint, form, or data parser
Instructions
- Scope the review: identify every file that handles user input, auth, file paths, database queries, or external calls. Don't review the whole repo blindly — focus there first.
- Check for these categories, in order:
- Injection: SQL/NoSQL/command/template injection — any place user input reaches a query, shell command, or eval-like function without parameterization or sanitization.
- Auth & session flaws: missing authorization checks, predictable tokens, session fixation, privilege escalation paths.
- Secrets exposure: hardcoded keys/passwords, secrets in logs, secrets in client-side/bundled code.
- Unsafe deserialization:
pickle,eval, uncheckedJSON.parseof untrusted data feeding into object construction. - Input validation: missing length/type/format checks on anything from a user, URL, or external API.
- Dependency risk: flag outdated or known-vulnerable packages if a lockfile/manifest is visible.
- For each finding, do not just say "looks risky" — confirm the actual code path: trace the input from its source to the vulnerable sink before reporting it.
- Never attempt to exploit, run, or demonstrate the vulnerability. Describe it; don't weaponize it.
- Output a structured report, not prose. Use this exact format per finding:
Severity is one of: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, INFO.## [SEVERITY] <short title> **Location:** file:line **Issue:** what's wrong, in one or two sentences **Recommendation:** the specific fix - End with a one-line summary: total findings by severity, and whether the code is safe to merge as-is.
Examples
User: "Can you audit this login endpoint for security issues?" Agent should: Trace how the password/token flows from request to storage/comparison, check for timing-safe comparison, rate limiting, and SQL parameterization, then output the structured report format above — not a paragraph of general advice.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

