fleet-standard-adoption
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when bringing this repo into compliance with a GeneFoundry fleet standard (tool-naming, response-envelope, container-hardening, versioning, MCP transport, or logging) or closing its tracking issue.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Follow AGENTS.md first. The canonical standards live under ../genefoundry-router/docs/ (the sibling router repo for *-link.
- Distinctive: line 19
Read the standard's Definition of Done.
- Distinctive: line 21
Add or update the guard test the standard specifies so the change can't regress.
- Very specific: line 22
Run make ci-local; note residual risk.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fleet-Standard Adoption
Follow AGENTS.md first. The canonical standards live under ../genefoundry-router/docs/ (the sibling router repo for *-link; docs/ in the router):
TOOL-NAMING-STANDARD-v1.md—verb_nounsnake_case, stable, collision-free names (lets the router drop anytransform).RESPONSE-ENVELOPE-STANDARD-v1.1.md(current; supersedes v1) —success, the payload, flat execution-error fields (error_code/message/retryable/recovery_action), and_meta(data_version). v1.1 adds untrusted-content fencing and error-message sanitation (fixed/enum error fields — never reflect caller-supplied or upstream text into caller-visible fields or logs; see the FastMCP not-found reflection guard). The nestederror:{...}shape is deferred — don't use it.CONTAINER-HARDENING-STANDARD-v1.md— non-root, read-only, cap-drop, digest-pin, Trivy + SBOM.VERSIONING-STANDARD-v1.md— single-source metadata version; noserverInfo.versionframework leak.MCP-TRANSPORT-STANDARD-v1.md— single stateless/mcp(no 307 split), canonicalserverInfo/ health.- Logging & CLI Standard v1 — structured logging + CLI conventions (canonical text tracked per-repo; no router doc).
Workflow
- Read the standard's Definition of Done; check this repo against it.
- Apply the smallest change that meets the DoD; reuse the router's reference implementation rather than reinventing.
- Add or update the guard test the standard specifies so the change can't regress.
- Run
make ci-local; note residual risk. - Close the standard's tracking issue with a one-line CHANGELOG note.
Common mistakes
- Adding router-side workarounds instead of fixing the backend to the standard.
- Meeting the letter without the guard test — it regresses on the next change.
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 10
- berntpopp/hpo-link★ 1100% same
- berntpopp/mgi-link★ 1100% same
- berntpopp/clingen-link★ 0100% same
- berntpopp/gencc-link★ 0100% same
- berntpopp/gnomad-link★ 0100% same
- berntpopp/gtex-link★ 0100% same
- berntpopp/hgnc-link★ 0100% same
- berntpopp/mondo-link★ 0100% same
- berntpopp/spliceailookup-link★ 0100% same
- berntpopp/vep-link★ 0100% same
Edited · 1
- berntpopp/genefoundry-router★ 699% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ci-failure-triageSkill
- code-quality-reviewSkill
- dependency-cve-sweepSkill
- fastapi-route-changeSkill
- mcp-tool-changeSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- security-reviewSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

