agentleFS
bereach-aibereach-ai/linkedin-prospecting-skills/skills/cold-email/SKILL.md

cold-email

Skill6 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Writes cold emails and follow-ups for people in a BeReach list: finds work emails, one sequence per persona, drafts the user sends. Use for any cold email or email outreach.

97 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use free-tools, popups and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • CesarjoquinSkill

    free-tools

    When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.

    Also in 25 projects that use this

  • CesarjoquinSkill

    popups

    When the user wants to create or optimize popups, modals, overlays, slide-ins, or banners for conversion purposes. Also use when the user mentions "exit intent," "popup conversions," "modal optimization," "lead capture popup," "email popup," "announcement banner," "overlay," "collect emails with a popup," "exit popup," "scroll trigger," "sticky bar," or "notification bar." Use this for any overlay or interrupt-style conversion element. For forms outside of popups, see cro. For general page conversion optimization, see cro.

    Also in 23 projects that use this

  • coreyhaines31Skill

    marketing-council

    When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

    Also in 18 projects that use this

  • Hussain-ElfalahSkill

    andreessen

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Hussain-ElfalahSkill

    business-investment-advisor

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • roerohanSkill

    emails

    When the user wants to create or optimize an email sequence, drip campaign, automated email flow, or lifecycle email program. Also use when the user mentions "email sequence," "drip campaign," "nurture sequence," "onboarding emails," "welcome sequence," "re-engagement emails," "email automation," "lifecycle emails," "trigger-based emails," "email funnel," "email workflow," "what emails should I send," "welcome series," or "email cadence." Use this for any multi-email automated flow. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For in-app onboarding, see onboarding.

    Also in 24 projects that use this

  • +5 more from Cesarjoquin
  • +1 more from Hussain-Elfalah

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 90 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the list: bereach_contacts with the list's campaignId, engaged: false (a found whyNow is a free dated reason).

    line 35
  2. Very specific:

    Read what they sell: bereach_memory_list, type offering, fullContent: true.

    line 38
  3. Very specific:

    Read the voice card: bereach_memory_list, type playbook, fullContent: true, the one place for writing rules (it wins on voice, the …

    line 40
  4. Very specific:

    Before sorting, read linkedin-personas references/persona-card.md (ICP, plan groups and cards).

    line 43
  5. Very specific:

    Put each person in one persona, tag persona:<short-name> (bereach_contact_update, tags.add).

    line 44
  6. Very specific:

    Only verified: true is sendable.

    line 77
  7. Very specific:

    Never tags.set; leave notes alone.

    line 97
  8. Very specific:

    Stop, unsubscribe, not interested: bereach_contact_update with doNotContact: true.

    line 103
  9. Distinctive:

    Write to anyone who asked to stop, on any channel, or anyone on HOLD.

    line 134

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 90 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Cold email

BeReach finds the work email; Claude writes the drafts. The user sends them from their own mailbox or email tool. Nothing here sends or reads an email. bereach_draft_dm, bereach_send_dm and bereach_schedule_drafts are for LinkedIn messages: never use them for an email.

Each step ends with a Deliver: a page drawn as in references/artifacts.md. Only a page that spends email credits or hands over emails to send waits for the user's yes; the Sending check is shown and Claude goes on.

Refused with a trial link: give it to the user and stop, no retry.

The web only teaches the user's trade; a vendor statistic never decides. Asked for best practice: a verdict per slot, then the upgraded email to validate.

Step 1. Sending check (once per user)

Five questions only:

  1. Which mailbox sends (work domain, not a free webmail)?
  2. Are SPF, DKIM and DMARC set? If unsure, say how to check (references/deliverability.md).
  3. How many cold emails a day? Over 50 per mailbox: too many.
  4. Which countries are the people in (sets the footer, references/legal.md)? Germany: left out unless the user says otherwise. An EU country legal.md does not name: amber, check.
  5. Is tracking off (no open pixel, no wrapped links)?

Deliver: "Sending check".

Step 2. Who, and why them

  1. Read the list: bereach_contacts with the list's campaignId, engaged: false (a found whyNow is a free dated reason). Drop do-not-contact people and anyone tagged cold-email, silently (count only).
  2. Read what they sell: bereach_memory_list, type offering, fullContent: true. Its ## Personas holds the persona cards (each with Offer and Why now window).
  3. Read the voice card: bereach_memory_list, type playbook, fullContent: true, the one place for writing rules (it wins on voice, the self-check on craft).
  4. Persona cards or voice card missing: build them first (linkedin-personas or linkedin-voice skill).
  5. Before sorting, read linkedin-personas references/persona-card.md (ICP, plan groups and cards). Put each person in one persona, tag persona:<short-name> (bereach_contact_update, tags.add). READY: title matches one card, company inside its ICP. CHECK: two cards fit or the company is outside; no email lookup, brief or draft until the user decides. Out of scope (not this persona, outside the ICP): left at the search step; found later: HOLD, no email. Batches of 25 at most, 2 per company.

Deliver: "Who is who", cost for READY people only, plus the whole-list signals ceiling (bereach_add_signals start: false). Nothing is spent before the yes.

Step 3. One sequence per persona

  1. Open references/frameworks.md now, before writing a word (Default, Which shape when). Baseline: its default (self-check, opening and ask) in the user's voice unless a row fits better, opening on a dated fact from their brief, else a moment of their work. The user's own emails give the voice (address form, greeting, sign-off, words), never the slots: keep a slot of theirs only where it passes the self-check, rewrite every failing one with a framework named on the page, replies included. The offer comes from the user's own trade, is kept by the reader (a sheet, a plan, a sample of their work; software: a free audit or estimate of THEIR case, never a case study), exists before the send (no blank); an object a past reply asked for works as the offer. Never offer to find contacts unless that is the user's trade.
  2. 3 or 4 emails (references/sequence.md), days 1, 4, 8, 14, step 2 a reply in the thread, each ending on one yes/no question naming its object, the last offering the way out. ONE offer per sequence.
  3. Proof only in a follow-up, from a real customer of the user, else none. Never a claim about the user's work, customers or results they did not give: ask.
  4. A {why now} slot in every template that reads right whatever fills it. No fact under 6 months: a moment line. Two languages: same offer, same ask.

Deliver: "Message templates", one per persona, email 1 filled for one real person. After the yes, save it under that persona: bereach_memory_save type offering replaces the whole entry, so resend the Step 2 offering whole.

Step 4. Emails, then the reasons

  1. bereach_find_emails with every READY contactId in ONE call (25 at most). One email credit per email found; none found is free. Quote emailCreditsUsed from the reply, never a sum.
  2. Only verified: true is sendable; else "unverified, skip".
  3. Email credits run out: give buyCreditsUrl and the note, stop for the people left.
  4. bereach_brief (contactId, campaignId, no include, historyVerbatim 200; maxAgeDays left at its default, the conversation is read anew) for every READY person before each email to them, batches included. For a whole list, bereach_add_signals, within the Who is who yes. Nothing usable: a moment line, marked.
  5. Fill {why now}: one sentence giving the fact AND why it made the user write (the tie to the offer), tense per its date (references/frameworks.md, Personal line rules). Never invent a fact.

Step 5. Drafts and review

Open references/frameworks.md again, then write each READY person's email 1 from the approved sequence plus their line. Self-check and fix every draft. An offer not deliverable now: block those rows.

Deliver: "Drafts for review". The user approves, edits or removes rows.

Step 6. Hand over

Deliver: "Ready to send", then:

  • bereach_contact_update on everyone handed over: tags.add ["cold-email", "cold-email-YYYY-MM-DD"]. Never tags.set; leave notes alone.
  • One line: own mailbox, 20 to 50 a day at most, tracking off, found addresses not emailed deleted (references/deliverability.md, legal.md).

Step 7. Replies and results

  • Stop, unsubscribe, not interested: bereach_contact_update with doNotContact: true; the user removes them from any running sequence the same day.
  • A positive reply (pasted by the user): bereach_brief first (maxAgeDays left at its default, the conversation is read anew); answer what they asked with one next step, the same working day; a fact only the user knows is a blank, never invented.
  • Results: the user's own counts (mailbox, tool, CSV, pasted replies), never estimated. A rate counts only batches 7 days past their first email; younger ones show "counting". No rate under 10 sent. One change per batch between two passing versions, within one persona. While a test runs, send the version with more interested replies; a tie keeps the baseline.

Deliver: "Results".

Self-check (every draft)

  • No title, tenure, headline or company description recited; the fact is tied to why the user writes.
  • Fact in their row or brief, tense matching its date, under 6 months. Nothing invented, no figure without a source, no guess in quotation marks.
  • Line one names their situation, not us; then who writes (name + trade noun, one clause); one offer from the user's trade, no proof in email 1, one yes/no question naming it. No call, slot, meeting or vague wish.
  • No hedge, no guessed feeling, no thank-you or line that says nothing about them.
  • Email 1 body 50 to 90 words, follow-ups under 50 (footer not counted), personal line 240 characters at most.
  • Subject 1 to 5 words, no fake "Re:"/"Fwd:"; no buzzword; no link, image, attachment or tracking in email 1.
  • Native-grade language per the voice card. French: vous unless the card says tu or the person wrote tu first; "Bonjour" capitalised with vous.
  • Country footer on email 1 (references/legal.md); follow-ups carry the opt-out line only (US: full footer on every email).
  • 4 emails at most per person; never the same email to one company in the same week; no 3 drafts share opening or shape (rotate the moment lines).

What not to do

  • Promise reply rates or quote open rates.
  • Send to a guessed or unverified address.
  • Write to anyone who asked to stop, on any channel, or anyone on HOLD.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.