goldenpipe
llms.txt0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITArchived repositoryView on GitHub
Golden Suite orchestrator — chains data validation (GoldenCheck), transformation (GoldenFlow), and entity resolution (GoldenMatch) into a single pluggable pipeline. DQBench Pipeline Score: 88.07. Adaptive logic: - Skips transformation if no quality issues found - Routes to privacy-preserving matching if sensitive fields detected - Reports reasoning for every decision
- Installs packages
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- docs/llms-full.txtllms.txt
- docs/llms.txtllms.txt
The file
Files
# GoldenPipe
> Golden Suite orchestrator — chains data validation (GoldenCheck), transformation (GoldenFlow), and entity resolution (GoldenMatch) into a single pluggable pipeline. DQBench Pipeline Score: 88.07.
## Interfaces
- MCP Server: `goldenpipe mcp-serve` (4 tools: run_pipeline, validate_pipeline, list_stages, explain_pipeline)
- Remote MCP: https://goldenpipe-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp/ (4 tools, Smithery: https://smithery.ai/servers/benzsevern/goldenpipe)
- A2A Server: `goldenpipe agent-serve --port 8250` (4 skills)
- CLI: `goldenpipe run`, `goldenpipe validate`, `goldenpipe stages`, + 5 more commands
- Python API: `import goldenpipe` — `run()`, `run_df()`, `run_stages()`
- REST API: `goldenpipe serve` on port 8000
## Install
- `pip install goldenpipe` — standalone orchestrator
- `pip install goldenpipe[golden-suite]` — with all three tools (goldencheck, goldenflow, goldenmatch)
## Quick Examples
### Run the full pipeline (one command)
```python
import goldenpipe as gp
result = gp.run("customers.csv")
print(result.status) # "success"
print(result.check) # Quality findings
print(result.transform) # What was fixed
print(result.match) # Deduplicated clusters
print(result.reasoning) # Why each decision was made
```
### CLI
```bash
goldenpipe run data.csv # full pipeline
goldenpipe run data.csv --skip-check # skip validation
goldenpipe validate pipeline.yaml # validate config
goldenpipe stages # list available stages
```
### Custom pipeline config
```python
from goldenpipe import Pipeline, PipelineConfig, StageSpec
config = PipelineConfig(
pipeline="check-and-flow-only",
stages=[
StageSpec(use="goldencheck.scan"),
StageSpec(use="goldenflow.transform"),
# omit goldenmatch.dedupe to skip dedup
],
)
pipeline = Pipeline(config=config)
result = pipeline.run(source="data.csv")
```
## Pipeline Flow
```
Raw Data
| GoldenCheck -- profile & discover quality issues
| GoldenFlow -- fix issues, standardize, reshape
| GoldenMatch -- deduplicate, match, create golden records
v
Golden Records
```
Adaptive logic:
- **Skips** transformation if no quality issues found
- **Routes** to privacy-preserving matching if sensitive fields detected
- **Reports** reasoning for every decision
## Key Types
- `PipeResult` — `.status` (SUCCESS/PARTIAL/FAILED), `.stages`, `.artifacts`, `.errors`, `.reasoning`, `.timing`, `.skipped`, `.input_rows`
- `PipelineConfig` — YAML-loadable config with stage specs
- `StageSpec` — `use` (stage entry point) + optional config
## Available Stages
- `goldencheck.scan` — validate data quality
- `goldenflow.transform` — fix issues and standardize
- `goldenmatch.dedupe` — deduplicate and match records
## Docs
- [Full API reference](docs/llms-full.txt): 222-line guide with all patterns
- [PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/goldenpipe/)
- [GitHub](https://github.com/benzsevern/goldenpipe)
## Part of the Golden Suite
- [GoldenCheck](https://github.com/benzsevern/goldencheck) — Validate & profile (DQBench: 88.40)
- [GoldenFlow](https://github.com/benzsevern/goldenflow) — Transform & standardize (DQBench: 100/100)
- [GoldenMatch](https://github.com/benzsevern/goldenmatch) — Deduplicate & match (DQBench: 95.30)
- [GoldenPipe](https://github.com/benzsevern/goldenpipe) — Orchestrate the pipeline (DQBench: 88.07)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

