spec-checkpoint
Skill2 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create a comprehensive checkpoint commit with detailed analysis of all changes. Use this skill when the user says "checkpoint", "commit everything", "save my progress", "create a commit", or wants to stage and commit all current changes with a well-crafted message. Also use when the user says "/spec-checkpoint" (or their host's equivalent invocation syntax) or asks to snapshot current work. This skill stages all changes and creates a descriptive commit — it does not push.
- Reads credentials
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- generative-seoSkill
- spec-createSkill
- spec-implementSkill
- spec-investigateSkill
- spec-setupSkill
- spec-shipSkill
- spec-verifySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Create a checkpoint commit that captures all current changes — but only after the code passes lint, type check, and build.
- Distinctive: line 25
Multi-repo: run this in every listed repo that has changes, making one commit per repo with the same subject.
- Very specific: line 27
No config?: If the spec-setup skill is available, run it first, then continue here.
- Distinctive: line 36
Run these commands to understand the full picture:
- Very specific: line 45
Use commands from .spec-driven.yml.
- Very specific: line 68
Write a commit message in the config's git.commit_style (conventional → feat: …, ticket → STP-123: … using the ticket ID from the branch …
- Very specific: line 71
Use conventional commit prefixes where the project uses them: feat:, fix:, refactor:, docs:, chore:, etc.
- Distinctive: line 79
Create the commit using a heredoc for proper formatting:
- Distinctive: line 104
If the repo has no git history, run git init first
- Distinctive: line 105
All quality checks (lint, type-check, build) MUST pass before committing — fix issues, don't skip them
- Distinctive: line 106
Keep the commit body short — a TL;DR, not an essay
- Distinctive: line 107
Follow the project's existing commit conventions (check the log first)
- Distinctive: line 108
Do not push — only commit locally
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Checkpoint Commit
Create a checkpoint commit that captures all current changes — but only after the code passes lint, type check, and build.
Project config (read first)
Load .spec-driven.yml: walk up from the current directory to the home folder, and the first one
found wins (a multi-repo config only applies inside the repos it lists). If none is found, check
~/.spec-driven/workspaces.json, which maps each multi-repo config to its repo paths. Use the config
whose repos contain the current directory, because a workspace's repos can live in unrelated folders. Its values beat anything
you would detect or assume. This skill uses commands (lint/typecheck/test/build), git.commit_style, and layout/repos.
Multi-repo: run this in every listed repo that has changes, making one commit per repo with the same subject. Monorepo: run the checks for the packages that changed, or the root commands if that's how the repo works.
No config? If the spec-setup skill is available, run it first, then continue here. If it
isn't, detect what this skill needs from the repo, ask about anything ambiguous, and offer to save
the answers to .spec-driven.yml (keys: layout, repos, tracker, git, commands,
specs_dir).
Instructions
Step 1: Analyze Changes
Run these commands to understand the full picture:
git status— see all tracked and untracked filesgit diff— see detailed changes in tracked filesgit diff --cached— see already-staged changesgit log -5 --oneline— understand this repo's commit message style
Step 2: Quality Checks
Use commands from .spec-driven.yml. For any that are missing, find the repo's own lint, typecheck, test, and build commands — package.json scripts (with the
repo's package manager), Makefile, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, CI config, or CLAUDE.md/
AGENTS.md. Run each one the repo has; skip (and say so) any it doesn't. If any fail, fix the
issues before proceeding — do not skip or ignore failures.
Iterate until every check passes cleanly. Only then move to the next step.
Step 3: Stage Everything
Stage all changes — tracked modifications, deletions, and new untracked files:
git add -AThen review git status again. If anything staged looks like it could hold secrets —
.env*, *.pem, *_rsa, credentials.json, secrets.*, or an unfamiliar filename that might
contain an API key — unstage it (git restore --staged <file>) and tell the user what was
excluded and why, rather than committing it silently. Don't rely on the filename alone for
anything you don't recognize; skim its diff if you're unsure.
Step 4: Craft the Commit Message
Write a commit message in the config's git.commit_style (conventional → feat: …, ticket → STP-123: … using the ticket ID from the branch name, freeform). Without config, follow the project's existing conventions (observed from git log). Structure:
- First line: clear, concise summary in imperative mood (50-72 chars)
- Use conventional commit prefixes where the project uses them:
feat:,fix:,refactor:,docs:,chore:, etc.
- Use conventional commit prefixes where the project uses them:
- Body (separated by blank line): a short TL;DR of the changes — 1-3 sentences max. No bullet lists, no file-by-file breakdowns, no lengthy explanations.
- Footer: co-author attribution, naming whichever agent/model is actually running this skill — never hardcode a specific vendor or model name, since this skill runs under many different hosts
Step 5: Commit
Create the commit using a heredoc for proper formatting:
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
{first line}
{tldr}
Co-Authored-By: {agent name} <noreply@example.com>
EOF
)"Fill in {agent name} with whatever the current agent/model actually identifies as (e.g. "Claude", "Codex", "Cursor Agent") — if your host has no clean way to identify itself, omit the footer entirely rather than guessing.
Step 6: Report
Display:
- The commit hash and message summary
- Files changed count
- Insertions/deletions summary
Important
- Stage and commit everything except files that look like secrets or credentials (see Step 3) — check contents, not just filenames, before assuming something is safe to commit
- If the repo has no git history, run
git initfirst - All quality checks (lint, type-check, build) MUST pass before committing — fix issues, don't skip them
- Keep the commit body short — a TL;DR, not an essay
- Follow the project's existing commit conventions (check the log first)
- Do not push — only commit locally
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

