review-pull-request
Skill3 starsChanged 11 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Reviews one GitHub pull request and prepares a verified local review or posts its exact approved contents. Use when the user asks to review a PR, audit a pull request, draft review comments or request-changes feedback, write a PR review file, or optionally post approved review comments. Handles exactly one PR.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- stigmer/stigmertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- open-telemetry/opentelemetry.iotheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- dotnet/aspnetcoretheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- LibreSign/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 25, 2026
- jmlrt/skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 24, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- dotnet/aspnetcore★ 39ksame name
- open-telemetry/opentelemetry.io★ 996same name
- stigmer/stigmer★ 9same name
- LibreSign/agent-skills★ 2same name
- jmlrt/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- evals/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- api-security-best-practicesSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- code-review-excellenceSkill
- committing-scoped-changesSkill
- council-of-advisorsSkill
- diagnosing-root-causesSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- generate-flow-diagramSkill
- improving-test-suitesSkill
- interview-meSkill
- planning-codebase-restructuringSkill
- pr-creatorSkill
- prompt-structurerSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- recency-guardSkill
- refactoring-codeSkill
- reporting-skill-issuesSkill
- responding-to-pr-review-commentsSkill
- review-pull-requestSkill
- rewriting-code-strictlySkill
- stop-slopSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- unslopSkill
- validate-implementation-planSkill
- vitestSkill
- workflow-skill-architectSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- analyzing-recent-project-stateSkill
- clarifying-assumptionsSkill
- committing-scoped-changesSkill
- council-of-advisorsSkill
- creating-work-item-childrenSkill
- diagnosing-root-causesSkill
- executing-work-item-taskSkill
- fetching-work-itemSkill
- generate-flow-diagramSkill
- generate-handoff-documentSkill
- improving-skill-definitionSkill
- improving-test-suitesSkill
- orchestrating-workflowSkill
- planning-codebase-restructuringSkill
- planning-task-executionSkill
- planning-work-item-tasksSkill
- pr-creatorSkill
- prompt-structurerSkill
- recency-guardSkill
- refactoring-codeSkill
- refine-taskSkill
- reporting-skill-issuesSkill
- responding-to-pr-review-commentsSkill
- review-software-engineer-cvSkill
- rewriting-code-strictlySkill
- validate-implementation-planSkill
- workflow-skill-architectSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.