agentleFS
azalioazalio/map-framework/.codex/AGENTS.md

map-framework

AGENTS.md155 starsChanged 59 days agoMITView on GitHub

This project uses the MAP (Monitor-Actor-Predictor) Framework for structured development. Important: You must trust this project in Codex settings for project-scoped configuration to take effect. Without trust, .codex/ config, hooks, and agent files are ignored. Codex skills are installed under .agents/skills. MAP uses a workflow gate hook that restricts file-modifying commands during research and review phases. This prevents accidental edits while exploring. Note: Hooks require hooks = true in config.toml and are not supported on Windows. For write-capable MAP skills…

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not edit unrelated files, even if they are nearby or easy to clean up.

    line 42
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not add, remove, or upgrade dependencies unless the current task or subtask explicitly names that dependency change.

    line 43
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not refactor neighboring code unless the acceptance criteria cannot pass without that exact refactor.

    line 44
  4. Distinctive:

    If a dependency change, broad refactor, or scope expansion seems necessary, report it as a blocker/tradeoff instead of doing it silently.

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

MAP Framework Agents

This project uses the MAP (Monitor-Actor-Predictor) Framework for structured development.

Prerequisites

Important: You must trust this project in Codex settings for project-scoped configuration to take effect. Without trust, .codex/ config, hooks, and agent files are ignored. Codex skills are installed under .agents/skills.

Available Agents

AgentRoleInvoked By
researcherCodebase exploration and context gathering$map-plan Step 0
decomposerTask decomposition into atomic subtasks$map-plan Step 4
monitorCode review and validation$map-plan SPEC_REVIEW, $map-efficient

Available Skills

SkillPurpose
$map-planPlan and decompose complex tasks
$map-efficientExecute approved MAP plans end to end
$map-fastQuick implementation for small changes
$map-checkQuality gates and verification
$map-reviewPre-landing code review (normal, adversarial, cross-AI)
$map-prd-reviewReview PRD readiness, strengths, risks, and uncovered edge cases

Hooks

MAP uses a workflow gate hook that restricts file-modifying commands during research and review phases. This prevents accidental edits while exploring.

Note: Hooks require hooks = true in config.toml and are not supported on Windows.

Mutation Boundary Constraints

For write-capable MAP skills and agents:

  • Do not edit unrelated files, even if they are nearby or easy to clean up.
  • Do not add, remove, or upgrade dependencies unless the current task or subtask explicitly names that dependency change.
  • Do not refactor neighboring code unless the acceptance criteria cannot pass without that exact refactor.
  • If a dependency change, broad refactor, or scope expansion seems necessary, report it as a blocker/tradeoff instead of doing it silently.

Getting Started

  1. Trust this project in Codex settings
  2. Type $map-plan <your task> to start planning
  3. Type $map-efficient to execute an approved plan

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.