agentleFS
Sign inStart free
ayeshakhalid13ayeshakhalid13/LoopEngineering-CrashCourse/.agents/skills/writing-guidelines/SKILL.md

writing-guidelines

Skill16 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my docs", "check writing style", "audit prose", "review docs voice and tone", or "check this page against the writing handbook".

30 other projects use a version of this, 8 of them edited; 1 new project in the last 4 weeks, against 3 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Cooling: 1 new project took it in the last 4 weeks, 0.3× the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 2 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 1 new projectWeek of Oct 11: 1 new projectWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 4 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use deslop and ship.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SentrySkill

    deslop

    Strip AI-generated noise from the diff before pushing — extra comments a human wouldn't write, defensive try/catch in trusted code paths, casts to any, inline imports in Python, and other style inconsistencies with the surrounding file. Use this immediately before commit so the diff stays clean.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    ship

    Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Read the specified files (or prompt user for files/pattern)

    line 17
  2. Common:

    Check against all rules in the fetched guidelines

    line 18
  3. Common:

    Use WebFetch to retrieve the latest rules.

    line 29
  4. Common:

    When a user provides a file or pattern argument:

    line 33
  5. Common:

    Read the specified files

    line 35
  6. Common:

    If no files specified, ask the user which files to review.

    line 39

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Writing Guidelines

Review files for compliance with Writing Guidelines.

How It Works

  1. Fetch the latest guidelines from the source URL below
  2. Read the specified files (or prompt user for files/pattern)
  3. Check against all rules in the fetched guidelines
  4. Output findings in the terse file:line format

Guidelines Source

Fetch fresh guidelines before each review:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vercel-labs/writing-guidelines/main/command.md

Use WebFetch to retrieve the latest rules. The fetched content contains all the rules and output format instructions.

Usage

When a user provides a file or pattern argument:

  1. Fetch guidelines from the source URL above
  2. Read the specified files
  3. Apply all rules from the fetched guidelines
  4. Output findings using the format specified in the guidelines

If no files specified, ask the user which files to review.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free