proposal
Skill1 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Writes a short proposal or quote a small business can send: the problem in the buyer's words, what you will do, 2 to 3 price options with totals checked by a script, timeline, what is not included, and terms to check before signing. Reads pricing from founder/ (pricing.md, numbers.json, offer.md) and the call notes in sales/calls/. Use it when someone says "write a proposal", "send them a quote", "they asked for pricing", "put together three options", "price this job", "quote for 110 people", or "turn my call notes into a proposal". Works for app plans, services, catering, retainers and local jobs. Drafts only, and never invents prices: missing numbers become placeholders. Not a contract and not legal advice.
16 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- meslva/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ChuluuMGL/proposal-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- adeerkhan/vitruviustheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- zubair-trabzada/ai-proposal-claudetheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- chriswestt/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- youdcode/open-companytheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use audit.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 16
- ajsahni/agents-office★ 601same name
- AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects★ 390same name
- zubair-trabzada/ai-proposal-claude★ 39same name
- GTMify/aigtm★ 25same name
- alejopijuan/Claude-Code-Agency-Co-Founder★ 19same name
- adeerkhan/vitruvius★ 10same name
- ChuluuMGL/proposal-ppt-skill★ 3same name
- ChuluuMGL/proposal-skill★ 3same name
- kurenn/claude-skill-proposal★ 2same name
- youdcode/open-company★ 2same name
6 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- call-prepSkill
- follow-upSkill
- founder-contextSkill
- humanizeSkill
- lead-emailSkill
- lead-genSkill
- linkedin-dmSkill
- local-outreachSkill
- prospect-researchSkill
- reach-planSkill
- referral-asksSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 43
No invented prices: Use prices from founder/ files or the user.
- Very specific: line 48
Totals come from the script,: not mental math: python3 scripts/price_options.py sales/proposals/<slug>-prices.json --md …
- Very specific: line 55
No prices yet?: Do not stop and do not guess.
- Distinctive: line 81
If the buyer named a budget line ("anything over $200 a month needs more thought"), make sure one option sits under it if the business can …
- Very specific: line 84
Use a founding or early price only if founder-context or founder/offer.md offers one, with its exact terms (how many seats, how long, …
- Very specific: line 87
If founder/numbers.json gives unit costs, add cost_per_unit to the JSON and check the margin the script prints.
- Distinctive: line 133
Check every number against the script output or the founder/ file it came from.
- Distinctive: line 136
Run humanize on the proposal text (not the table).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
proposal
A proposal is the buyer's notes, written back to them, with a price. Keep it short enough to read on a phone: one to two pages. Long proposals do not win more; clear ones do.
What this skill reads and writes
Reads, using what exists:
- The call debrief or notes:
sales/calls/*<company-slug>*(from follow-up or call-prep). This is where the buyer's problem, words, decider, budget and dates come from. If there are no notes, ask for the basics in one message: what they need, quantity, start date, who signs. - Prices:
founder/pricing.md,founder/numbers.json(unit costs, price),founder/offer.md(bonuses, guarantee). Also the business context from founder-context. sales/leads.csvandsales/accounts/<slug>.mdfor the company's details.
Writes:
sales/proposals/<company-slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md: the proposal.sales/proposals/<company-slug>-prices.json: the price options, for the script.- Updates the lead:
python3 <skills>/lead-gen/scripts/leads.py set sales/leads.csv --company "<name>" --next-step "proposal sent <date>, decision by <date>"(status staysmeetinguntil they decide). If lead-gen is not installed, edit the row by hand.<skills>is the parent of this skill's folder; lead-gen is installed beside it. If lead-gen is missing, edit sales/leads.csv by hand and keep its 16 columns.
Next skill: follow-up to plan the nudges after it is sent; call-prep if a review call is set.
Rules
- No invented prices. Use prices from founder/ files or the user. If a price is missing,
write
{{price per seat}}and list it at the top as "fill before sending". Never pick a number because it sounds right. - No invented proof. Case studies, testimonials, customer counts and results only if founder-context or founder/ lists them as usable. Respect off-limits topics.
- Totals come from the script, not mental math:
python3 scripts/price_options.py sales/proposals/<slug>-prices.json --md sales/proposals/<slug>-table.mdPaste its table into the proposal. If prices are placeholders, skip the script and show the formula instead ("{{price}} x 6 seats x 12 months"). - Only promise what the notes support. Scope lists only what the notes or founder files say the user will do. Anything the buyer asked for that the user did not confirm (a trial account, a dietary option, rotating vendors) goes under "To confirm", not in scope.
- No prices yet? Do not stop and do not guess. Write the whole proposal with
{{price}}placeholders, and tell the user the fastest way to set prices: their own costs and competitors, or a pricing skill if they have one (for example founder-pricing from biz-ready). Keep scope to what founder-context says the product does. - Not legal advice. The "terms to check" list is a reminder of what to decide, not a contract. For a large deal, the user should have a lawyer or an advisor read the final terms.
- Drafts only. The user sends it and signs nothing through this skill.
How to build the options
Two or three options, never more. Each one solves the problem; they differ in scope (how many people, which days, how much service) as well as term, not just in contract length. If a launch or founding price exists, show the option it applies to at that price, with the normal price beside it.
A pattern that is easy to choose from:
- Start small: the smallest thing that solves the main problem. Lowest risk for them.
- Recommended: what the notes say they need. Mark it "Recommended" and say why in one line, tied to their words.
- Full: more scope, longer term or more service, often with a discount for the commitment if founder/ allows one.
Price what they asked for first. If they asked for "about 110 people", one option is exactly that at the standard price, so they can compare. Apply a founding or launch discount only to what the offer covers, and show it as its own line.
If the buyer named a budget line ("anything over $200 a month needs more thought"), make sure one option sits under it if the business can do that profitably, and say so.
Use a founding or early price only if founder-context or founder/offer.md offers one, with its exact terms (how many seats, how long, deadline).
If founder/numbers.json gives unit costs, add cost_per_unit to the JSON and check the
margin the script prints. Flag any option under the user's target margin before they send it.
Proposal format
# Proposal for <company>
Prepared for <name, role> by <sender, business>, <date>. Valid until <date>.
## What you told us
- <their problem, in their words from the notes>
- <what it costs them now, if they said>
- <what they want to be true>
## What we will do
- <scope, plain and specific>
## Options
<table from the script>
**Recommended: <option>.** <one line on why, tied to what they said>
## Timeline
- <start date>: ...
- <milestones, from the notes or as {{date}}>
## Not included
- <things outside scope, and options they asked about that are not confirmed>
## Terms to check before signing
- Payment: when and how (upfront, monthly, net 15)
- Term and cancel: how long, notice to cancel
- Changes: what happens if the quantity or scope changes
- <business-specific: delivery window, minimum order, data import, dietary labels...>
## Next step
<one action: "reply with the option you want and we start on <date>", or a review call>
(In your reply to the user, also name the next skill: follow-up, to plan the nudges.)
Questions: <sender name, email or phone from context>More terms by business type: references/terms-by-business.md.
Before showing it
- Check every number against the script output or the founder/ file it came from.
- List every
{{placeholder}}at the top under "Fill before sending". Search the file for{{and make sure each one is on the list. - Run humanize on the proposal text (not the table). If humanize is not installed, clean it by hand: no em dashes, no stock phrases, short sentences, and say so in the reply.
In the reply: the options in one line each, the recommended one, the placeholders to fill, and the next step.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

