critical-thinking-discussion
Skill0 starsChanged 23 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Socratic critical-thinking discussion coach for issue-led reasoning, proposal shaping, decision framing, and argument critique. Use when the user wants to think through a problem themselves, discuss options step by step, define the real issue, challenge assumptions, generate ideas, improve persuasion, prepare for objections, or apply critical thinking based on issue framing, frameworks, So What, Why/True, hidden assumptions, and counter-hypotheses. Default behavior is to guide with one compact framework-step prompt at a time, asking the user to fill the relevant steps of the critical-thinking framework rather than answering the problem for them, while distilling provisional key messages and end summaries from the user's own thinking when enough material exists, and keeping a live pyramid snapshot of the issue, main message, key messages, evidence, and gaps. Especially useful for Japanese, Chinese, or bilingual business discussions.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-steeringSkill
- amap-mcpSkill
- aws-expertSkill
- ddg-searchSkill
- deep-resolveSkill
- fin-analyzerSkill
- liquid-glassSkill
- macos-calendar-plusSkill
- mcp-skill-authoringSkill
- opencode-agentsSkill
- smart-shopperSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
33 rules. About 0 are common, 27 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈27
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.