quality-measures
Skill62 starsChanged 5 months agoMIT-0View on GitHub
Pipeline skill for computing HEDIS quality measures from claims and clinical data. Use when the user asks to calculate HEDIS measure rates, check continuous enrollment, build denominator/numerator logic, detect care gaps, compute utilization rates, identify high-cost claimants, or score risk stratification indices. Triggers include "calculate HEDIS", "measure rate", "continuous enrollment check", "care gap detection", "denominator query", "numerator logic", "utilization rate", "high-cost claimant", "Charlson score", "LACE score", "claims analysis", "quality measure SQL".
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- aws-genai-ml-architectSkill
- bioinformatics-on-healthomicsSkill
- biomarker-discoverySkill
- cdisc-complianceSkill
- cell-type-annotationSkill
- cheminformaticsSkill
- claims-analyticsSkill
- claims-billing-rulesSkill
- clinical-data-standardsSkill
- coordination-of-benefitsSkill
- dicom-processingSkill
- digital-pathologySkill
- drug-repurposingSkill
- edc-data-validationSkill
- ehr-data-parsingSkill
- genomic-variant-interpretationSkill
- hedis-measure-specificationSkill
- imaging-study-designSkill
- medical-device-software-complianceSkill
- ml-researcherSkill
- molecular-dockingSkill
- multi-omics-integrationSkill
- multi-omics-pipelineSkill
- ngs-quality-controlSkill
- pa-clinical-policySkill
- pa-decision-automationSkill
- pharmacoepidemiologySkill
- protein-structure-analysisSkill
- provider-denial-workupSkill
- quantitative-proteomicsSkill
- radiology-preprocessingSkill
- risk-adjustmentSkill
- risk-adjustment-strategySkill
- risk-stratification-indicesSkill
- rna-seq-analysisSkill
- rwd-cohort-analysisSkill
- scrna-seq-pipelineSkill
- structure-based-drug-designSkill
- trajectory-analysisSkill
- translational-researchSkill
- variant-callingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 37
Keep code comments minimal and functional (what, not why-it-exists)
- Distinctive: line 447
Right: Use admit date and discharge date for inpatient claims — service date is for professional/outpatient claims
- Distinctive: line 458
Wrong: Only looking at the measurement year for qualifying diagnoses
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Quality Measures Calculation Pipeline
Overview
Provide deterministic Python and SQL code snippets for calculating HEDIS quality measures, detecting care gaps, computing utilization rates, identifying high-cost claimants, and scoring risk stratification indices from claims and clinical data.
Usage
- Calculate HEDIS measure rates, check continuous enrollment, detect care gaps, and score risk indices
Core Concepts
Response Format
- Lead with the command or code the user needs — explain after
- Structure as: confirm inputs → working code → key parameters explained → gotchas
- One complete working example per task; do not show every alternative
- Keep code comments minimal and functional (what, not why-it-exists)
- Target: 50-100 lines of code with brief surrounding explanation
Approach Selection
| Scenario | Approach | Key consideration |
| Single measure, ad-hoc | Python calculate_measure() | Fast iteration, easy debugging |
| Enterprise batch (all measures) | SQL CTEs per measure | Scales to millions of members |
| Data source: claims only | Use procedure/revenue codes for numerator | No clinical data available |
| Data source: claims + EHR | Supplement with lab values, vitals | Higher capture rate |
| Enrollment check: single payer | max_gap_days=45 (HEDIS default) | One enrollment table |
| Enrollment check: multi-payer | Merge enrollment spans first, then check | Avoid double-counting gaps |
1. Continuous Enrollment Check
1.1 Python Implementation
"""Check continuous enrollment with allowable gap."""
import pandas as pd
def check_continuous_enrollment(
enrollment: pd.DataFrame, member_id: str,
start_date: str, end_date: str, max_gap_days: int = 45,
) -> dict:
"""Check if a member is continuously enrolled with allowable gap.
Args:
enrollment: DataFrame [member_id, enroll_start, enroll_end].
member_id: Member to check.
start_date: Measurement period start (e.g., '2025-01-01').
end_date: Measurement period end / anchor date (e.g., '2025-12-31').
max_gap_days: Maximum allowable gap in days (HEDIS default: 45).
Returns:
Dict with is_enrolled (bool), total_gap_days (int), gap_periods (list).
"""
start, end = pd.Timestamp(start_date), pd.Timestamp(end_date)
me = enrollment[enrollment["member_id"] == member_id].copy()
me["enroll_start"] = pd.to_datetime(me["enroll_start"]).clip(lower=start)
me["enroll_end"] = pd.to_datetime(me["enroll_end"]).clip(upper=end)
me = me[me["enroll_start"] <= me["enroll_end"]].sort_values("enroll_start").reset_index(drop=True)
if me.empty:
return {"is_enrolled": False, "total_gap_days": (end - start).days, "gap_periods": []}
if not (me["enroll_end"] >= end).any():
return {"is_enrolled": False, "total_gap_days": -1, "gap_periods": []}
gap_periods, total_gap = [], 0
if me.iloc[0]["enroll_start"] > start:
g = (me.iloc[0]["enroll_start"] - start).days
total_gap += g
gap_periods.append({"from": str(start.date()), "to": str(me.iloc[0]["enroll_start"].date()), "days": g})
for i in range(1, len(me)):
if me.iloc[i]["enroll_start"] > me.iloc[i-1]["enroll_end"] + pd.Timedelta(days=1):
g = (me.iloc[i]["enroll_start"] - me.iloc[i-1]["enroll_end"]).days - 1
total_gap += g
gap_periods.append({"from": str(me.iloc[i-1]["enroll_end"].date()), "to": str(me.iloc[i]["enroll_start"].date()), "days": g})
return {"is_enrolled": total_gap <= max_gap_days, "total_gap_days": total_gap, "gap_periods": gap_periods}1.2 SQL Implementation
-- Continuous enrollment check with allowable gap (≤45 days)
WITH enrollment_segments AS (
SELECT member_id, enroll_start, enroll_end,
LEAD(enroll_start) OVER (PARTITION BY member_id ORDER BY enroll_start) AS next_start
FROM enrollment
WHERE enroll_end >= '2025-01-01' AND enroll_start <= '2025-12-31'
),
gaps AS (
SELECT member_id,
DATEDIFF(day, enroll_end, next_start) - 1 AS gap_days
FROM enrollment_segments
WHERE next_start IS NOT NULL
AND DATEDIFF(day, enroll_end, next_start) > 1
),
total_gaps AS (
SELECT member_id, SUM(gap_days) AS total_gap_days
FROM gaps
GROUP BY member_id
),
anchor_check AS (
SELECT DISTINCT member_id
FROM enrollment
WHERE enroll_end >= '2025-12-31'
)
SELECT a.member_id,
COALESCE(g.total_gap_days, 0) AS total_gap_days,
CASE WHEN COALESCE(g.total_gap_days, 0) <= 45 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS is_continuously_enrolled
FROM anchor_check a
LEFT JOIN total_gaps g ON a.member_id = g.member_id;2. HEDIS Measure Calculation
2.1 Generic Measure Calculator (Python)
"""Generic HEDIS measure rate calculator."""
import pandas as pd
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass
class MeasureResult:
measure_id: str
denominator_count: int
exclusion_count: int
numerator_count: int
rate: float
gap_members: list[str]
def calculate_measure(
eligible: pd.DataFrame,
exclusions: pd.DataFrame,
numerator_events: pd.DataFrame,
measure_id: str,
) -> MeasureResult:
"""Calculate a HEDIS measure rate.
Args:
eligible: Denominator members. Columns: [member_id].
exclusions: Excluded members. Columns: [member_id, exclusion_reason].
numerator_events: Members meeting numerator. Columns: [member_id, event_date].
measure_id: Measure identifier (e.g., 'CDC-HbA1c-Testing').
Returns:
MeasureResult with rate and gap member list.
"""
denom_ids = set(eligible["member_id"])
excl_ids = set(exclusions["member_id"])
eligible_denom = denom_ids - excl_ids
numer_ids = set(numerator_events["member_id"]) & eligible_denom
gap_ids = eligible_denom - numer_ids
denom_count = len(eligible_denom)
rate = len(numer_ids) / denom_count if denom_count > 0 else 0.0
return MeasureResult(
measure_id=measure_id,
denominator_count=denom_count,
exclusion_count=len(excl_ids & denom_ids),
numerator_count=len(numer_ids),
rate=round(rate, 4),
gap_members=sorted(gap_ids),
)2.2 Full Measure Calculation (SQL — CDC HbA1c Testing Example)
-- CDC: Comprehensive Diabetes Care — HbA1c Testing
WITH denominator AS (
SELECT DISTINCT m.member_id
FROM members m
JOIN claims c ON m.member_id = c.member_id
JOIN continuously_enrolled ce ON m.member_id = ce.member_id
WHERE DATEDIFF(year, m.date_of_birth, '2025-12-31') BETWEEN 18 AND 75
AND c.diagnosis_code LIKE 'E11%'
AND c.service_date BETWEEN '2024-01-01' AND '2025-12-31'
AND ce.is_continuously_enrolled = 1
),
exclusions AS (
SELECT DISTINCT member_id FROM claims
WHERE diagnosis_code IN ('Z51.5', 'N18.6')
OR revenue_code IN ('0115','0125','0135','0145','0155','0235')
),
numerator AS (
SELECT DISTINCT member_id FROM claims
WHERE procedure_code IN ('83036','83037')
AND service_date BETWEEN '2025-01-01' AND '2025-12-31'
)
SELECT COUNT(*) AS denom,
SUM(CASE WHEN e.member_id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS excluded,
SUM(CASE WHEN e.member_id IS NULL AND n.member_id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS numer,
ROUND(SUM(CASE WHEN e.member_id IS NULL AND n.member_id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)*1.0
/ NULLIF(COUNT(*) - SUM(CASE WHEN e.member_id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END), 0), 4) AS rate
FROM denominator d
LEFT JOIN exclusions e ON d.member_id = e.member_id
LEFT JOIN numerator n ON d.member_id = n.member_id;3. Care Gap Detection
"""Detect and prioritize open care gaps across members."""
import pandas as pd
from datetime import date
def detect_care_gaps(
members: pd.DataFrame,
measures: list[dict],
claims: pd.DataFrame,
measurement_year: int = 2025,
) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Detect open care gaps for a population.
Args:
members: DataFrame [member_id, date_of_birth, gender, risk_score].
measures: List of dicts with keys: measure_id, age_min, age_max,
gender (str|None), diagnosis_codes (list), numerator_codes (list),
star_weight (1 or 3).
claims: DataFrame [member_id, service_date, diagnosis_code, procedure_code].
measurement_year: Calendar year for measurement.
Returns:
DataFrame: [member_id, measure_id, star_weight, risk_score, priority_score].
"""
anchor = date(measurement_year, 12, 31)
year_start = date(measurement_year, 1, 1)
gaps = []
for measure in measures:
eligible = members.copy()
eligible["age"] = eligible["date_of_birth"].apply(lambda d: (anchor - d).days // 365)
eligible = eligible[eligible["age"].between(measure["age_min"], measure["age_max"])]
if measure.get("gender"):
eligible = eligible[eligible["gender"] == measure["gender"]]
if measure.get("diagnosis_codes"):
dx_members = claims[
claims["diagnosis_code"].str.startswith(tuple(measure["diagnosis_codes"]))
]["member_id"].unique()
eligible = eligible[eligible["member_id"].isin(dx_members)]
year_claims = claims[claims["service_date"].between(str(year_start), str(anchor))]
closed = year_claims[
year_claims["procedure_code"].isin(measure["numerator_codes"])
]["member_id"].unique()
for _, row in eligible[~eligible["member_id"].isin(closed)].iterrows():
sw = measure.get("star_weight", 1)
gaps.append({
"member_id": row["member_id"], "measure_id": measure["measure_id"],
"star_weight": sw, "risk_score": row.get("risk_score", 0),
"priority_score": round(sw * 30 + min(row.get("risk_score", 0) * 25, 25) + 20, 1),
})
return pd.DataFrame(gaps).sort_values("priority_score", ascending=False).reset_index(drop=True)4. Utilization Rate Computation
-- Utilization rates per 1000 members: ED, inpatient, 30-day readmissions
WITH members AS (
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT member_id) AS member_count FROM continuously_enrolled WHERE is_continuously_enrolled = 1
),
ed AS (
SELECT COUNT(*) AS cnt FROM claims WHERE revenue_code IN ('0450','0451','0452','0456','0459') AND service_date BETWEEN '2025-01-01' AND '2025-12-31'
),
ip AS (
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT claim_id) AS cnt FROM claims WHERE claim_type = 'inpatient' AND admit_date BETWEEN '2025-01-01' AND '2025-12-31'
),
readmit AS (
SELECT COUNT(*) AS cnt FROM (
SELECT member_id, admit_date, LAG(discharge_date) OVER (PARTITION BY member_id ORDER BY admit_date) AS prev_dc
FROM claims WHERE claim_type = 'inpatient' AND admit_date BETWEEN '2025-01-01' AND '2025-12-31'
) s WHERE DATEDIFF(day, prev_dc, admit_date) <= 30 AND prev_dc IS NOT NULL
)
SELECT ROUND(ed.cnt*1000.0/m.member_count,1) AS ed_per_1000,
ROUND(ip.cnt*1000.0/m.member_count,1) AS ip_per_1000,
ROUND(readmit.cnt*1000.0/m.member_count,1) AS readmit_per_1000
FROM members m, ed, ip, readmit;5. High-Cost Claimant Identification
"""Identify high-cost claimants and analyze cost drivers."""
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def identify_high_cost_claimants(
claims: pd.DataFrame,
threshold_percentile: float = 95,
measurement_year: int = 2025,
) -> dict:
"""Identify high-cost claimants above a percentile threshold.
Args:
claims: DataFrame [member_id, service_date, paid_amount, claim_type, diagnosis_code].
threshold_percentile: Percentile cutoff (default 95th).
measurement_year: Calendar year to analyze.
Returns:
Dict with threshold, count, pct of total spend, and member DataFrame.
"""
year_claims = claims[
pd.to_datetime(claims["service_date"]).dt.year == measurement_year
]
member_costs = (
year_claims.groupby("member_id")
.agg(total_paid=("paid_amount", "sum"), claim_count=("paid_amount", "count"))
.reset_index()
)
threshold = np.percentile(member_costs["total_paid"], threshold_percentile)
high_cost = member_costs[member_costs["total_paid"] >= threshold].sort_values(
"total_paid", ascending=False
)
return {
"threshold_amount": round(threshold, 2),
"high_cost_count": len(high_cost),
"high_cost_pct_of_total": round(
high_cost["total_paid"].sum() / member_costs["total_paid"].sum() * 100, 1
),
"high_cost_members": high_cost,
}6. Risk Stratification Scoring
6.1 Charlson Comorbidity Index (Python)
"""Calculate Charlson Comorbidity Index from diagnosis codes."""
# ICD-10 prefix → (condition, weight). Subset of key mappings.
CHARLSON_MAP = {
"I21": ("mi", 1), "I22": ("mi", 1), "I50": ("chf", 1),
"I70": ("pvd", 1), "I71": ("pvd", 1), "I6": ("cvd", 1),
"F01": ("dementia", 1), "F03": ("dementia", 1), "G30": ("dementia", 1),
"J4": ("copd", 1), "M05": ("ctd", 1), "M06": ("ctd", 1),
"K25": ("pud", 1), "K26": ("pud", 1),
"K70": ("mild_liver", 1), "K73": ("mild_liver", 1), "K74": ("mild_liver", 1),
"E109": ("dm_uncomp", 1), "E119": ("dm_uncomp", 1),
"E102": ("dm_comp", 2), "E112": ("dm_comp", 2),
"G81": ("hemiplegia", 2), "N18": ("renal", 2),
"C": ("cancer", 2),
"C77": ("metastatic", 6), "C78": ("metastatic", 6), "C79": ("metastatic", 6),
"B20": ("hiv", 6),
}
def charlson_score(diagnosis_codes: list[str]) -> dict:
"""Calculate Charlson Comorbidity Index. Returns {score, conditions}."""
matched: dict[str, int] = {}
for code in [c.replace(".", "") for c in diagnosis_codes]:
for prefix, (cond, wt) in CHARLSON_MAP.items():
if code.startswith(prefix):
if cond == "cancer" and "metastatic" in matched:
continue
if cond == "metastatic":
matched.pop("cancer", None)
if cond == "dm_uncomp" and "dm_comp" in matched:
continue
if cond == "dm_comp":
matched.pop("dm_uncomp", None)
if cond not in matched or wt > matched[cond]:
matched[cond] = wt
break
return {"score": sum(matched.values()), "conditions": matched}6.2 LACE Readmission Risk Score
"""Calculate LACE readmission risk score."""
def lace_score(length_of_stay: int, acuity: str, charlson: int, ed_visits_6mo: int) -> dict:
"""Calculate LACE index for 30-day readmission risk.
Returns dict with total score, component scores, and risk tier.
"""
l = 7 if length_of_stay >= 14 else (5 if length_of_stay >= 7 else (4 if length_of_stay >= 4 else min(length_of_stay, 3)))
a = {"emergent": 3, "urgent": 2, "elective": 0}.get(acuity.lower(), 0)
c = 5 if charlson >= 4 else min(charlson, 3)
e = min(ed_visits_6mo, 4)
total = l + a + c + e
tier = "high" if total >= 10 else ("moderate" if total >= 5 else "low")
return {"total": total, "components": {"L": l, "A": a, "C": c, "E": e}, "risk_tier": tier}7. Measure Stratification by Plan/Provider
-- Measure rate stratified by health plan and provider
SELECT health_plan, assigned_pcp_npi,
COUNT(*) - SUM(CASE WHEN e.member_id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS eligible_denom,
SUM(CASE WHEN e.member_id IS NULL AND n.member_id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS numerator,
ROUND(SUM(CASE WHEN e.member_id IS NULL AND n.member_id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) * 100.0
/ NULLIF(COUNT(*) - SUM(CASE WHEN e.member_id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END), 0), 1) AS rate_pct
FROM denominator_members m
LEFT JOIN exclusion_members e ON m.member_id = e.member_id
LEFT JOIN numerator_members n ON m.member_id = n.member_id
GROUP BY health_plan, assigned_pcp_npi
ORDER BY rate_pct ASC;8. Parameter Reference
| Parameter | Default | Description |
measurement_year | Current calendar year | HEDIS reporting year |
max_gap_days | 45 | Maximum allowable enrollment gap |
anchor_date | Dec 31 of measurement year | Date member must be enrolled through |
dx_lookback_years | 2 | Years to look back for qualifying diagnoses |
threshold_percentile | 95 | Percentile cutoff for high-cost identification |
readmission_window | 30 | Days after discharge for readmission flag |
9. Common Mistakes
- Wrong: Including segment end dates when calculating enrollment gap days Right: Calculate gaps as the calendar days between segments (day after end of segment A to day before start of segment B) Why: Off-by-one errors in gap calculation incorrectly exclude continuously enrolled members or include ineligible ones
- Wrong: Using enrollment segments as-is without clipping to the measurement year boundaries Right: Clip all enrollment segments to the measurement year start and end dates before calculating gaps Why: Segments extending beyond the year inflate coverage calculations and produce incorrect enrollment determinations
- Wrong: Using service date for inpatient utilization metrics Right: Use admit date and discharge date for inpatient claims — service date is for professional/outpatient claims Why: Inpatient utilization (admissions, readmissions, length of stay) is defined by admission events, not individual service lines
- Wrong: Counting a member multiple times in the numerator when they have multiple qualifying events Right: Deduplicate numerator events by member ID — each member counts once regardless of how many tests or services they received Why: Multiple events for the same member inflate the numerator and produce artificially high measure rates
- Wrong: Calculating member age as of the run date or an arbitrary date Right: Calculate age as of the measure-specific anchor date (typically December 31 of the measurement year) Why: Using the wrong anchor date shifts age-based eligibility and includes or excludes members incorrectly
- Wrong: Only looking at the measurement year for qualifying diagnoses Right: Apply the measure-specified lookback period (typically 2 years) for identifying members with qualifying conditions Why: Many HEDIS measures require a diagnosis in the measurement year OR the year prior; using only one year misses eligible members
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

